Accuracy of visual tree defoliation assessment: a case study in Finland

Defoliation (crown thinning) is widely used as a rapid method of tree condition assessment. As a method that is based on subjective visual observation it might be influenced by statistically significant observer bias. Significant observer bias has been discovere in some countries. We analyzed the significance of observer bias occurring in the Finland's forest condition monitoring system. We analysed the data of three training courses held to the field personnel (2006, 2007, 2008). Our results indicate that some inconsistencies occur between observers, but these are still not systematic in nature. In conclusion, the detected observer biases are independent incidents, caused mainly by the observer perception during the single events. Therefore there is no need to make any systematic corrections for Finnish national visual tree defoliation assessments. We suggest that the best way to improve field assessments is the proper education and guidance of field personnel.

[1]  G. Gertner,et al.  Correlated observer errors and their effects on survey estimates of needle-leaf loss , 1995 .

[2]  M. Dobbertin,et al.  Operator errors in tree crown transparency estimates using the image analysis system CROCO , 2004 .

[3]  Christine Stone,et al.  Assessment of crown condition in eucalypt vegetation by remotely sensed optical indices. , 2004, Journal of environmental quality.

[4]  John L. Innes,et al.  Forest health surveys: problems in assessing observer objectivity , 1988 .

[5]  Nobuya Mizoue,et al.  Within country accuracy of tree crown transparency estimates using the image analysis system CROCO: a case study from Switzerland , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  William A. Bechtold,et al.  Using crown condition variables as indicators of forest health , 2004 .

[7]  Nobuya Mizoue,et al.  Using slides to test for changes in crown defoliation assessment methods part II: Application of the image analysis system CROCO , 2005, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[8]  P. Muukkonen.  Needle biomass turnover rates of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) derived from the needle-shed dynamics , 2005, Trees.

[9]  Sören Wulff.  The Accuracy of Forest Damage Assessments – Experiences from Sweden , 2002, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[10]  Martti Lindgren,et al.  Forest condition in Finland, 1986-1990. , 1991 .

[11]  M. Sheldon,et al.  The use and interpretation of the Friedman test in the analysis of ordinal-scale data in repeated measures designs. , 1996, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[12]  A. J. Moffat,et al.  Reporting the results of forest monitoring—an evaluation of the European forest monitoring programme , 2008 .

[13]  Milton Friedman,et al.  A Correction: The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance , 1939 .

[14]  K. Rehfuess,et al.  Acidic deposition — Extent and impact on forest soils, nutrition, growth and disease phenomena in Central Europe: A review , 1989 .

[15]  Helena M. Henttonen,et al.  Valtakunnan metsien 8. inventoinnin menetelmä ja tulokset metsäkeskuksittain Pohjois-Suomessa 1992–94 sekä tulokset Etelä-Suomessa 1986–92 ja koko maassa 1986–94 , 1970 .

[16]  J. Innes.  Forest decline , 1992 .

[17]  Geir-Harald Strand,et al.  Detection of observer bias in ongoing forest health monitoring programmes , 1996 .

[18]  John L. Innes,et al.  Observer variation as a source of error in assessments of crown condition through time , 1995 .

[19]  R. Boswell,et al.  Assessment of crown condition in forest trees: comparison of methods, sources of variation and observer bias , 2003 .

[20]  Nobuya Mizoue,et al.  Using Slides to Test for Changes in Crown Defoliation Assessment Methods. Part I: Visual Assessment of Slides , 2004, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[21]  C. Stone,et al.  Harmonisation of methods for the assessment and reporting of forest health in Australia — a starting point , 2003 .

[22]  Nobuya Mizoue,et al.  Detecting Differences in Crown Transparency Assessments Between Countries using the Image Analysis System Croco , 2003, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[23]  R. Oren,et al.  THE EFFECT OF CROWN DIMENSIONS ON TRANSPARENCY AND THE ASSESSMENT OF TREE HEALTH , 2001 .

[24]  J. Innes,et al.  Combining field and control team assessments to obtain error estimates for surveys of crown condition , 1995 .

[25]  M. Salemaa,et al.  The Vitality of Conifers in Finland, 1986–88 , 1990 .

[26]  Svein Solberg,et al.  Crown density assessments, control surveys and reproducibility , 1999 .

[27]  L. Ukonmaanaho,et al.  Forest condition monitoring in Finland, National Report 2001. , 2002 .

[28]  P. Nöjd,et al.  Forest condition monitoring under the UN/ECE and EC programmes in Finland. , 2000 .

[29]  M. Friedman.  The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance , 1937 .

[30]  M. Friedman.  A Comparison of Alternative Tests of Significance for the Problem of $m$ Rankings , 1940 .

[31]  J. Innes.  Forest Health: Its Assessment and Status , 1993 .

[32]  J L Innes.  Forest health surveys--a critique. , 1988, Environmental pollution.

[33]  J. L. Innes,et al.  Consistency of observations of forest tree defoliation in three European countries , 1993, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[34]  Bernhard Hanisch,et al.  Waldschäden erkennen : Fichte und Kiefer = Monitoring of forest damage : spruce and pine = Reconnaître les dommages forestiers : epicéa et pin , 1990 .