Pressure drop mapping using 4D flow MRI in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease: A novel marker of valvular obstruction.

BACKGROUND The influence of complex bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) flow patterns on net intraluminal aortic pressure, both among patients with and without significant aortic stenosis, is unknown. Pressure drop (PD), as estimated by 4D Flow MRI, can quantify pre- vs post-valvular pressure at multiple levels simultaneously. METHODS In this prospective clinical study, 32 patients with BAV with varying degrees of aortic stenosis and regurgitation and 11 healthy subjects were enrolled. 4D flow MRI was processed and analyzed at 9 pre-defined thoracic aortic levels. PD was calculated at each plane relative to a reference located within the left ventricular outflow tract. Conventional 2D phase-contrast imaging was used as reference of hemodynamic obstruction. PD was compared between healthy subjects versus BAV patients using Kruskal-Wallis H test and Mann-Whitney U. Correlation studies were conducted using Spearman's rank-order correlation. RESULTS Both BAV patients and healthy subjects showed progressive elevation in PD from the aortic root to the distal descending thoracic aorta. However, BAV patients showed higher PD than healthy subjects (p ≤ 0.01) at all analysis planes. Patients with moderate-severe aortic stenosis (n = 5) by 2D phase-contrast (peak PG > 40 mm Hg) showed higher PD than those without in the descending aortic segments (p ≤ 0.005). A correlation (r = 0.88, p < 0.05) was observed between PD at the distal descending thoracic aorta and peak trans-valvular velocity measured by 2D phase-contrast MRI. CONCLUSION We demonstrated that PD with 4D flow MRI is clinically feasible in BAV patients and provides an additional physiologic description of valve-related hemodynamic obstruction.

[1]  M. Markl,et al.  Efficient method for volumetric assessment of peak blood flow velocity using 4D flow MRI , 2016, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  Pablo Lamata,et al.  Aortic Relative Pressure Components Derived from Four-Dimensional Flow Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Michael Markl,et al.  Viscous energy loss in the presence of abnormal aortic flow , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  S. Verma,et al.  Clinical and Pathophysiological Implications of a Bicuspid Aortic Valve , 2002, Circulation.

[5]  Tino Ebbers,et al.  Improving computation of cardiovascular relative pressure fields from velocity MRI , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  David M. Williams,et al.  2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Ame , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Assessment of aortic stenosis severity: when the gradient does not fit with the valve area , 2010, Heart.

[8]  Michael Markl,et al.  In vivo noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping in the human aorta: Phantom comparison and application in healthy volunteers and patients , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  T Ebbers,et al.  Estimation of relative cardiovascular pressures using time‐resolved three‐dimensional phase contrast MRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  A. Braverman,et al.  Surgical threshold for bicuspid aortic valve aneurysm: a case for individual decision-making , 2015, Heart.

[11]  Amir A Amini,et al.  Factors affecting the accuracy of pressure measurements in vascular stenoses from phase‐contrast MRI , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Scott D Flamm,et al.  Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[13]  T. Ebbers,et al.  4D Flow MRI quantification of blood flow patterns, turbulence and pressure drop in normal and stenotic prosthetic heart valves. , 2019, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  S. Verma,et al.  Aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  J. Hennig,et al.  Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: Optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  M. Markl,et al.  The Role of Imaging of Flow Patterns by 4D Flow MRI in Aortic Stenosis. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[17]  K. Murase,et al.  Development of a noninvasive method to measure intravascular and intracardiac pressure differences using magnetic resonance imaging. , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[18]  M. Markl,et al.  4D flow MRI and T1‐Mapping: Assessment of altered cardiac hemodynamics and extracellular volume fraction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy , 2016, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

[19]  S. Siu,et al.  Bicuspid aortic valve disease. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  F. Neumann,et al.  Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis. , 2008, European heart journal.

[21]  Anja Hennemuth,et al.  Pressure fields by flow-sensitive, 4D, velocity-encoded CMR in patients with aortic coarctation. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[22]  B. Carabello,et al.  Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment , 2009, European heart journal.

[23]  S. Caruthers,et al.  Practical Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Quantification of Aortic Valve Stenosis: Comparison With Echocardiography , 2003, Circulation.

[24]  Philippe Pibarot,et al.  Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Despite Preserved Ejection Fraction Is Associated With Higher Afterload and Reduced Survival , 2007 .

[25]  L. Fleisher,et al.  2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  D. Richardt,et al.  Toward individualized management of the ascending aorta in bicuspid aortic valve surgery: the role of valve phenotype in 1362 patients. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[27]  J. Hennig,et al.  Time‐resolved 3D MR velocity mapping at 3T: Improved navigator‐gated assessment of vascular anatomy and blood flow , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  Damien Garcia,et al.  What do you mean by aortic valve area: geometric orifice area, effective orifice area, or gorlin area? , 2006, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[29]  D. Milewicz,et al.  Bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy in adults: Incidence, etiology, and clinical significance. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[30]  P. Turski,et al.  Pressure Mapping and Hemodynamic Assessment of Intracranial Dural Sinuses and Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas with 4D Flow MRI , 2017, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[31]  Michael Markl,et al.  Bicuspid Aortic Valve Is Associated With Altered Wall Shear Stress in the Ascending Aorta , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[32]  K. Eagle,et al.  Surgical treatment of bicuspid aortic valve disease: knowledge gaps and research perspectives. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[33]  J. Eng,et al.  Sample Size Estimation : How Many Individuals Should Be Studied ? , 2022 .

[34]  D. Laidlaw,et al.  Three‐dimensional, time‐resolved (4D) relative pressure mapping using magnetic resonance imaging , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[35]  Rolf Fimmers,et al.  Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study , 2003, The Lancet.