Numerical study of the effect of uneven proppant distribution between multiple fractures on shale gas well performance

Abstract Uniform proppant distribution in multiple perforation clusters after hydraulic fracturing plays an important role in the commercial production of shale gas. However, it is very challenging to achieve a uniform proppant distribution during operation. In some cases, proppant distribution is uneven in different clusters within the same hydraulic fracturing stage. The effect of the uneven proppant distribution on well performance is not well understood and has been largely neglected in most reservoir simulations. Hence, it is paramount to develop a reservoir simulation approach to properly examine the relationship between proppant distribution and well performance for shale gas reservoirs. In this paper, we use numerical reservoir simulation to model the proppant distribution. The reservoir model with multiple hydraulic fractures is validated by field production data from Marcellus shale. Effects of gas desorption and stress-dependent fracture conductivity are considered in the simulation model. We perform sensitivity studies to quantify the key parameters affecting the well performance between uniform and non-uniform proppant distribution. The six variables, which are cluster spacing, initial reservoir pressure, fracture conductivity, fracture half-length, fracture height, and matrix permeability, are investigated. The fracture conductivity ratio of 1:1.5:2.5:4 for four clusters in the same fracturing stage is investigated for the uneven proppant distribution scenario. This work provides insights into a better understanding of the effect of proppant distribution on well performance.

[1]  Michael J. Mayerhofer,et al.  Stimulating Unconventional Reservoirs: Maximizing Network Growth While Optimizing Fracture Conductivity , 2009 .

[2]  Michael J. Mayerhofer,et al.  The Relationship Between Fracture Complexity, Reservoir Properties, and Fracture-Treatment Design , 2010 .

[3]  C. Fredd,et al.  Experimental Study of Hydraulic Fracture Conductivity Demonstrates the Benefits of Using Proppants , 2000 .

[4]  Kishore K. Mohanty,et al.  Effect of foam quality on effectiveness of hydraulic fracturing in shales , 2014 .

[5]  J. L. Huitt,et al.  Effect of a Partial Monolayer of Propping Agent on Fracture Flow Capacity , 1960 .

[6]  P. Carman,et al.  Proppant Diagenesis: Results So Far , 2010 .

[7]  Faruk Civan,et al.  Characterization of non-Darcy multiphase flow in petroleum bearing formations , 1990 .

[8]  Ramkumar Jayakumar,et al.  Impact of Uncertainty in Estimation of Shale-Gas-Reservoir and Completion Properties on EUR Forecast and Optimal Development Planning: A Marcellus Case Study , 2014 .

[9]  John R. C. Robinson,et al.  Understanding Gas Production Mechanism and Effectiveness of Well Stimulation in the Haynesville Shale Through Reservoir Simulation , 2010 .

[10]  Kamy Sepehrnoori,et al.  Simulation of Proppant Distribution Effect on Well Performance in Shale Gas Reservoirs , 2013 .

[11]  N. Warpinski.  Stress Amplification and Arch Dimensions in Proppant Beds Deposited by Waterfracs , 2010 .

[12]  Donna Marcotte,et al.  Marcellus Shale Hydraulic Fracturing And Optimal Well Spacing To Maximize Recovery And Control Costs , 2011 .

[13]  Kamy Sepehrnoori,et al.  An Efficient Reservoir-Simulation Approach To Design and Optimize Unconventional Gas Production , 2014 .

[14]  Kamy Sepehrnoori,et al.  Optimization of Well Spacing for Bakken Tight Oil Reservoirs , 2014 .

[15]  Tyrel Roy Woodworth,et al.  Extrapolation of Laboratory Proppant Placement Behavior to the Field in Slickwater Fracturing Applications , 2007 .

[16]  C. Cipolla,et al.  Reservoir Modeling in Shale-Gas Reservoirs , 2010 .

[17]  C. Cipolla,et al.  Reducing Exploration and Appraisal Risk in Low-Permeability Reservoirs Using Microseismic Fracture Mapping , 2010 .

[18]  Kamy Sepehrnoori,et al.  Simulation of gas desorption and geomechanics effects for unconventional gas reservoirs , 2014 .

[19]  Michael J. Mayerhofer,et al.  The Effect of Proppant Distribution and Un-Propped Fracture Conductivity on Well Performance in Unconventional Gas Reservoirs , 2009 .

[20]  B. Rubin,et al.  Accurate Simulation of Non Darcy Flow in Stimulated Fractured Shale Reservoirs , 2010 .

[21]  M. C. Vincent,et al.  The Next Opportunity To Improve Hydraulic-Fracture Stimulation , 2012 .

[22]  B. Alramahi,et al.  Proppant Embedment And Conductivity of Hydraulic Fractures In Shales , 2012 .

[23]  George Waters,et al.  Evaluation of Production Log Data from Horizontal Wells Drilled in Organic Shales , 2011 .

[24]  I. Langmuir.  THE ADSORPTION OF GASES ON PLANE SURFACES OF GLASS, MICA AND PLATINUM. , 1918 .

[25]  Tim Benton,et al.  Haynesville Shale - One Operator's Approach to Well Completions in this Evolving Play , 2009 .

[26]  Jason Baihly,et al.  Integrating All Available Data To Improve Production in the Marcellus Shale , 2011 .

[27]  K. Sepehrnoori,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of hydraulic fracture geometry in shale gas reservoirs , 2014 .