Force transformation in spider strain sensors: white light interferometry

Scanning white light interferometry and micro-force measurements were applied to analyse stimulus transformation in strain sensors in the spider exoskeleton. Two compound or ‘lyriform’ organs consisting of arrays of closely neighbouring, roughly parallel sensory slits of different lengths were examined. Forces applied to the exoskeleton entail strains in the cuticle, which compress and thereby stimulate the individual slits of the lyriform organs. (i) For the proprioreceptive lyriform organ HS-8 close to the distal joint of the tibia, the compression of the slits at the sensory threshold was as small as 1.4 nm and hardly more than 30 nm, depending on the slit in the array. The corresponding stimulus forces were as small as 0.01 mN. The linearity of the loading curve seems reasonable considering the sensor's relatively narrow biological intensity range of operation. The slits' mechanical sensitivity (slit compression/force) ranged from 106 down to 13 nm mN−1, and gradually decreased with decreasing slit length. (ii) Remarkably, in the vibration-sensitive lyriform organ HS-10 on the metatarsus, the loading curve was exponential. The organ is thus adapted to the detection of a wide range of vibration amplitudes, as they are found under natural conditions. The mechanical sensitivities of the two slits examined in this organ in detail differed roughly threefold (522 and 195 nm mN−1) in the biologically most relevant range, again reflecting stimulus range fractionation among the slits composing the array.

[1]  H. Pflüger,et al.  Proprioceptor distribution and control of a muscle reflex in the tibia of spider legs. , 1984, Journal of neurobiology.

[2]  Friedrich G Barth,et al.  Intracellular recording from a spider vibration receptor , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[3]  Friedrich G. Barth,et al.  Compound slit sense organs on the spider leg: Mechanoreceptors involved in kinesthetic orientation , 1972, Journal of comparative physiology.

[4]  F. Barth,et al.  Lyriform slit sense organ: Thresholds and stimulus amplitude ranges in a multi-unit mechanoreceptor , 1978, Journal of comparative physiology.

[5]  F. Barth,et al.  A Spider’s World: Senses and Behavior , 2001 .

[6]  F. Barth,et al.  In search of differences between the two types of sensory cells innervating spider slit sensilla (Cupiennius salei Keys.) , 2009, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  R. Blickhan,et al.  Strains in the exoskeleton of spiders , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[8]  F. Barth,et al.  Model studies on the mechanical significance of grouping in compound spider slit sensilla (Chelicerata, Araneida) , 1984, Zoomorphology.

[9]  E. Seyfarth,et al.  Structural correlates of mechanosensory transduction and adaptation in identified neurons of spider slit sensilla , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  Professor Dr. Friedrich G. Barth A Spider’s World , 2002, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[11]  Vladimir V Tsukruk,et al.  Viscoelastic nanoscale properties of cuticle contribute to the high-pass properties of spider vibration receptor (Cupiennius salei Keys) , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[12]  F. Barth Der sensorische Apparat der Spaltsinnesorgane (Cupiennius salei Keys., Araneae) , 1971, Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie.

[13]  E. Seyfarth Lyriform slit sense organs and muscle reflexes in the spider leg , 1978, Journal of comparative physiology.

[14]  F. Barth,et al.  Biomaterial systems for mechanosensing and actuation , 2009, Nature.

[15]  Johannes Bohnenberger Matched transfer characteristics of single units in a compound slit sense organ , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[16]  F. Barth,et al.  Finite element modeling of arachnid slit sensilla: II. Actual lyriform organs and the face deformations of the individual slits , 2009, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[17]  F. G. Barth,et al.  Vibratory communication in spiders: Adaptation and compromise at many levels , 1997 .

[18]  F. Barth,et al.  Ein atlas der spaltsinnesorgane von Cupiennius salei keys. Chelicerata (Araneae) , 1970, Zeitschrift für Morphologie der Tiere.

[19]  F. Barth,et al.  Spider vibration receptors: Threshold curves of individual slits in the metatarsal lyriform organ , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[20]  F. Barth,et al.  Finite element modeling of arachnid slit sensilla—I. The mechanical significance of different slit arrays , 2007, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[21]  Friedrich G. Barth,et al.  Slit sense organs and kinesthetic orientation , 1971, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[22]  F. Barth Die Physiologie der Spaltsinnesorgane , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[23]  F. Barth,et al.  The release of attack and escape behavior by vibratory stimuli in a wandering spider (Cupiennim salei keys.) , 1983, Journal of comparative physiology.

[24]  A. S. French,et al.  Intracellular characterization of identified sensory cells in a new spider mechanoreceptor preparation. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  R. Blickhan Stiffness of an arthropod leg joint. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  F. Barth Die Physiologie der Spaltsinnesorgane , 1972, Journal of comparative physiology.

[27]  F. Barth,et al.  Lyriform slit sense organs , 1975, Journal of comparative physiology.