Computational Study of the CC3 Impeller and Vaneless Diffuser Experiment

Abstract Centrifugal compressors are compatible with the low exit corrected flows found in the high pressure compressor of turboshaft engines and may play an increasing role in turbofan engines as engine overall pressure ratios increase. Centrifugal compressor stages are difficult to model accurately with RANS CFD solvers. A computational study of the CC3 centrifugal impeller in its vaneless diffuser configuration was undertaken as part of an effort to understand potential causes of RANS CFD mis-prediction in these types of geometries. Three steady, periodic cases of the impeller and diffuser were modeled using the TURBO Parallel Version 4 code: (1) a k-e turbulence model computation on a 6.8 million point grid using wall functions, (2) a k-e turbulence model computation on a 14 million point grid integrating to the wall, and (3) a k-ω turbulence model computation on the 14 million point grid integrating to the wall. It was found that all three cases compared favorably to data from inlet to impeller trailing edge, but the k-e and k-ω computations had disparate results beyond the trailing edge and into the vaneless diffuser. A large region of reversed flow was observed in the k-e computations which extended from 70 to 100 percent span at the exit rating plane, whereas the k-ω computation had reversed flow from 95 to 100 percent span. Compared to experimental data at near-peak-efficiency, the reversed flow region in the k-e case resulted in an under-prediction in adiabatic efficiency of 8.3 points, whereas the k-ω case was 1.2 points lower in efficiency.

[1]  Mark G. Turner.  Multistage Turbine Simulations With Vortex–Blade Interaction , 1996 .

[2]  David L. Whitfield,et al.  Navier-Stokes calculations for the unsteady flowfield of turbomachinery , 1993 .

[3]  Dale E. Van Zante,et al.  Blade Row Interaction Effects on the Performance of a Moderately Loaded NASA Transonic Compressor Stage , 2002 .

[4]  J. P. Chen,et al.  A Parallel Flow Solver for Unsteady Multiple Blade Row Turbomachinery Simulations , 2001 .

[5]  David Landon Tarr.  Scaling of impeller response to impeller-diffuser interactions in centrifugal compressors , 2008 .

[6]  Caitlin J. Smythe.  Forced response predictions in modern centrifugal compressor design , 2005 .

[7]  Gary J. Skoch,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Stall and Stall Control in Axial and Radial Compressors , 2006 .

[8]  Elizabeth Lurie,et al.  Design of a High Efficiency Compact Centrifugal Compressor for Rotorcraft Applications , 2011 .

[9]  J. Zhu,et al.  CMOTT Turbulence Module for NPARC , 1997 .

[10]  Gary J. Skoch,et al.  Laser Anemometer Measurements of the Flow Field in a 4:1 Pressure Ratio Centrifugal Impeller , 1997 .

[11]  Gerard E. Welch,et al.  Rotary-Wing Relevant Compressor Aero Research and Technology Development Activities at Glenn Research Center , 2009 .

[12]  P. S. Prahst,et al.  Aerodynamic Synthesis of a Centrifugal Impeller Using CFD and Measurements , 1997 .

[13]  Gary J. Skoch,et al.  An Investigation of Surge in a High-Speed Centrifugal Compressor Using Digital PIV , 2001 .

[14]  Andreas Lehwald,et al.  Fluid dynamics and mixing behavior of a static mixer using simultaneously Particle Image Velocimetry and Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence measurements , 2008 .

[15]  Jen‐Ping Chen,et al.  Comparison of time-accurate calculations for the unsteady interaction in turbomachinery stage , 1998 .

[16]  P. S. Prahst,et al.  Aerodynamic Synthesis of a Centrifugal Impeller Using Computational Fluid Dynamics and Measurements , 1999 .

[17]  Ted F. McKain,et al.  Coordinates for a High Performance 4:1 Pressure Ratio Centrifugal Compressor , 1997 .

[18]  Jen-Ping Chen,et al.  Validation of Heat Transfer and Film Cooling Capabilities of the 3-D RANS Code TURBO , 2010 .