Perspective directions of state regulation of competition between human and artificial intellectual capital in Industry 4.0

The purpose of the research is to determine the perspective directions of state regulation of competition between human and artificial intellectual capital in Industry 4.0 and to develop scientific and methodological recommendations for their implementation. For this, the directions of state regulation of competition between human and artificial intellectual capital are described, monitoring of competition between human and artificial intellectual capital by the example of modern Russia (2019) is performed and scientific and practical recommendations for state regulation of competition between human and artificial intellectual capital are developed, with their approbation by the example of modern Russia (2019).,A method of expert evaluation is used for collection of the information and empirical data. The method of comparative analysis is used for comparing the successfulness of implementing the distinguished directions of state regulation of competition between human and artificial intellectual capital (4.1) according to the official statistics to their current evaluation according to the interested parties. Also, future evaluation (forecasts) according to the interested parties (until 2045) is determined.,It is substantiated that during evaluation of state regulation of competition between human and artificial intellectual capital in Industry 4.0, one cannot use only the official statistics, as these data are fragmentary and indirect. Fuller and more precise data are provided by assessment according to the interested parties. They allow determining the current and the future state of affairs and, based on it, compiling a forecast and developing a long-term strategy of state regulation of competition between human and artificial intellectual capital in Industry 4.0.,The perspective directions of state regulation of competition between human and artificial intellectual capital in Industry 4.0 are as follows: stimulation of competition in the market of intellectual capital, social risk management of the market of intellectual capital, managing international competition in the market of intellectual capital and ecological risk management of the intellectual capital market. As the experience of modern Russia shows, even at the initial stage of transition to Industry 4.0, the measures of state regulation of competition between human and artificial intellectual capital are not enough, but their deficit is moderate. In the course of development of Industry 4.0, the necessity for the measures of regulation will grow, and their deficit will increase. That's why there's a need for strategic approach to their implementation, which envisages their systemic reconsideration and supplementing. An author's algorithm is offered for this.

[1]  Lisa Jeffrey,et al.  More human than human? Artificial intelligence in the archive , 2018, Archives and Manuscripts.

[2]  Antonio Hidalgo Nuchera,et al.  Dynamics of service innovation management and co-creation in firms in the digital economy sector , 2019 .

[3]  Elena G. Popkova,et al.  The Model of State Management of Economy on the Basis of the Internet of Things , 2019, Ubiquitous Computing and the Internet of Things: Prerequisites for the Development of ICT.

[4]  Michèle Finck.  Digital Co-Regulation: Designing a Supranational Legal Framework for the Platform Economy , 2017 .

[5]  Louis B. Rosenberg,et al.  Keeping Humans in the Loop: Pooling Knowledge through Artificial Swarm Intelligence to Improve Business Decision Making , 2019, California Management Review.

[6]  Sai S. Nudurupati,et al.  Contemporary performance measurement and management (PMM) in digital economies , 2016 .

[7]  Louis Rosenberg,et al.  Keeping Humans in the Loop: Pooling Knowledge through Artificial Swarm Intelligence to Improve Business Decision Making: , 2019 .

[8]  S. Rowlinson,et al.  Intellectual capital for exploratory and exploitative innovation , 2019, Journal of Intellectual Capital.

[9]  M. Metzger,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights , 2019, Journal of Democracy.

[10]  Bruno S. Sergi,et al.  Will Industry 4.0 and Other Innovations Impact Russia’s Development? , 2018, Exploring the Future of Russia’s Economy and Markets.

[11]  Susanne Durst,et al.  Increasing smart city competitiveness and sustainability through managing structural capital , 2017 .

[12]  Gunjan Chhabra,et al.  Future Trends of Artificial Intelligence in Human Biofield , 2019, VOLUME-8 ISSUE-10, AUGUST 2019, REGULAR ISSUE.

[13]  Elissa Farrow.  To augment human capacity—Artificial intelligence evolution through causal layered analysis , 2019, Futures.

[14]  Anthony Miller,et al.  The intrinsically linked future for human and Artificial Intelligence interaction , 2019, Journal of Big Data.

[15]  E. Popkova,et al.  Managing the Global Financial System on the Basis of Artificial Intelligence: Possibilities and Limitations , 2018, The Future of the Global Financial System: Downfall or Harmony.

[16]  Jian Wang,et al.  Optimization of a three-echelon cold chain considering freshness-keeping efforts under cap-and-trade regulation in Industry 4.0 , 2020 .

[17]  Olga C. Santos,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Psychomotor Learning: Modeling Human Motion from Inertial Sensor Data , 2019, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[18]  Omar Boufous,et al.  Artificial intelligence, ethics and human values: the cases of military drones and companion robots , 2018, Artificial Life and Robotics.

[19]  Joo-Wha Hong,et al.  Artificial Intelligence, Artists, and Art , 2019, ACM Trans. Multim. Comput. Commun. Appl..

[20]  Peter Cappelli,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Human Resources Management: Challenges and a Path Forward , 2019, California Management Review.

[21]  Tathagata Chatterji.  Digital urbanism in a transitional economy – a review of India’s municipal e-governance policy , 2018 .

[22]  E. Elahi,et al.  Agricultural intensification and damages to human health in relation to agrochemicals: Application of artificial intelligence , 2019, Land Use Policy.

[23]  Lakshmi,et al.  Artificial Intelligence based Human Facial Action Recognition by Deep Learning Neural Network , 2019, VOLUME-8 ISSUE-10, AUGUST 2019, REGULAR ISSUE.

[24]  I. Ipcioglu.  A Comparative Analysis of Knowledge Management Practices in Times of Crisis in the Digital Age: Evidence from an Emerging Economy , 2015 .

[25]  Sean Kanuck.  Humor, Ethics, and Dignity: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence , 2019, Ethics & International Affairs.

[26]  Peter Dell,et al.  Two economic perspectives on the IPv6 transition , 2010 .

[27]  O. Kovács.  The dark corners of industry 4.0 – Grounding economic governance 2.0 , 2018, Technology in Society.

[28]  Artificial Intelligence in Human Resources Management: Challenges and a Path Forward , 2019, California Management Review.

[29]  E. Popkova,et al.  The role of social marketing and PR in the context of globalization and integration of modern entrepreneurship , 2017 .

[30]  Tooran Alizadeh,et al.  Urban governance and big corporations in the digital economy: An investigation of socio-spatial implications of Google Fiber in Kansas City , 2017, Telematics and informatics.

[31]  E. Popkova.  Preconditions of Formation and Development of Industry 4.0 in the Conditions of Knowledge Economy , 2018, Industry 4.0: Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century.

[32]  A. E. Bayraktaroglu,et al.  Intellectual capital and firm performance: an extended VAIC model , 2019, Journal of Intellectual Capital.

[33]  Sarishma Sharma,et al.  Intellectual capital disclosures in an emerging economy: status and trends , 2017 .

[34]  Jiahong Chen,et al.  The boundaries of legal personhood: how spontaneous intelligence can problematise differences between humans, artificial intelligence, companies and animals , 2018, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[35]  E. Vagnoni,et al.  Intellectual capital in support of farm businesses’ strategic management: a case study , 2018, Journal of Intellectual Capital.

[36]  S. Burdon,et al.  Leading digital economies: a best practice approach to converged regulation , 2010 .

[37]  Verena Bader,et al.  Algorithmic decision-making? The user interface and its role for human involvement in decisions supported by artificial intelligence , 2019, Organization.

[38]  Digital Economy: Complexity and Variety vs. Rationality , 2020, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems.

[39]  T. Lanshina,et al.  Global Governance and the Role of the G20 in the Emerging Digital Economy , 2017 .

[40]  Feng Li,et al.  How smart cities transform operations models: a new research agenda for operations management in the digital economy , 2016 .

[41]  K. Frimpong,et al.  Review of Climate Change Adaptation and Social Protection Policies of Ghana: The Extent of Reducing Impacts of Climate Change and Heat Stress Vulnerability of Smallholder Farmers , 2015 .

[42]  Daniel B. Shank,et al.  When are artificial intelligence versus human agents faulted for wrongdoing? Moral attributions after individual and joint decisions , 2019, Information, Communication & Society.