Pilot Study for Investigating the Cyclic Behavior of Slit Damper Systems with Recentering Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) Bending Bars Used for Seismic Restrainers

Although the steel slit dampers commonly utilized for aseismic design approach can dissipate considerable energy created by the yielding of base materials, large residual deformation may happen in the entire frame structure. After strong external excitation, repair costs will be incurred in restoring a structure to its original condition and to replace broken components. For this reason, alternative recentering devices characterized by smart structures, which mitigate the damage for such steel energy dissipation slit dampers, are developed in this study. These devices, feasibly functioning as seismic restrainers, can be improved by implementing superelastic shape memory alloy (SMA) bending bars in a parallel motion with the steel energy-dissipating damper. The bending bars fabricated with superelastic SMAs provide self-centering forces upon unloading, and accordingly contribute to reducing permanent deformation in the integrated slit damper system. The steel slit dampers combined with the superelastic SMA bending bars are evaluated with respect to inelastic behavior as simulated by refined finite element (FE) analyses. The FE slit damper models subjected to cyclic loads are calibrated to existing test results in an effort to predict behavior accurately. The responses of the proposed slit damper systems are compared to those of the conventionally used slit damper systems. From the analysis results, it is concluded that innovative steel slit dampers combined with superelastic SMA bending bars generate remarkable performance improvements in terms of post-yield strength, energy dissipation, and recentering capability.

[1]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Shape optimization of metallic yielding devices for passive mitigation of seismic energy , 2010 .

[2]  E. Sacco,et al.  A one-dimensional model for superelastic shape-memory alloys with different elastic properties between austenite and martensite , 1997 .

[3]  J. McCormick,et al.  PERMISSIBLE RESIDUAL DEFORMATION LEVELS FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES CONSIDERING BOTH SAFETY AND HUMAN ELEMENTS , 2008 .

[4]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Design, analysis and application of innovative composite PR connections between steel beams and CFT columns , 2011 .

[5]  M. Alam,et al.  Feasibility study of utilizing superelastic shape memory alloy plates in steel beam–column connections for improved seismic performance , 2015 .

[6]  Donatello Cardone,et al.  Implementation and testing of passive control devices based on shape memory alloys , 2000 .

[7]  Jong Wan Hu Numerical simulation for the behavior of superelastic shape memory alloys , 2013 .

[8]  Eunsoo Choi,et al.  A new concept of isolation bearings for highway steel bridges using shape memory alloys , 2005 .

[9]  Jong Wan Hu,et al.  Seismic design, nonlinear analysis, and performance evaluation of recentering buckling-restrained braced frames (BRBFs) , 2014 .

[10]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Steel Beam-Column Connections using Shape Memory Alloys , 2004 .

[11]  Theodore L. Karavasilis,et al.  Hysteretic model for steel energy dissipation devices and evaluation of a minimal-damage seismic design approach for steel buildings , 2012 .

[12]  T. W. Duerig,et al.  Engineering Aspects of Shape Memory Alloys , 1990 .

[13]  Junwon Seo,et al.  Performance-based optimal design of self-centering friction damping brace systems between recentering capability and energy dissipation , 2014 .

[14]  Jong Wan Hu,et al.  Response of Seismically Isolated Steel Frame Buildings with Sustainable Lead-Rubber Bearing (LRB) Isolator Devices Subjected to Near-Fault (NF) Ground Motions , 2014 .

[15]  Songye Zhu,et al.  Seismic Analysis of Concentrically Braced Frame Systems with Self-Centering Friction Damping Braces , 2008 .

[16]  Jong Wan Hu Seismic analysis and evaluation of several recentering braced frame structures , 2014 .

[17]  Sandeep Kumar,et al.  Appl. Sci , 2013 .

[18]  M. Dolce,et al.  Mechanical behaviour of shape memory alloys for seismic applications 2. Austenite NiTi wires subjected to tension , 2001 .

[19]  Gangbing Song,et al.  Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures , 2006 .

[20]  M. Shahria Alam,et al.  Seismic performance assessment of highway bridges equipped with superelastic shape memory alloy-based laminated rubber isolation bearing , 2013 .

[21]  Liu Jian,et al.  Applications of shape memory alloys , 2001 .

[22]  Faris Albermani,et al.  Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation , 2008 .

[23]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces , 2003 .

[24]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic Assessment of Concentrically Braced Steel Frames with Shape Memory Alloy Braces , 2007 .

[25]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  CYCLIC PROPERTIES OF SUPERELASTIC SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY WIRES AND BARS , 2004 .

[26]  M. Shahria Alam,et al.  Performance-based assessment and design of FRP-based high damping rubber bearing incorporated with shape memory alloy wires , 2014 .

[27]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Analyses and evaluations for composite-moment frames with SMA PR-CFT connections , 2011 .

[28]  M. Shahria Alam,et al.  Shape memory alloy wire-based smart natural rubber bearing , 2013 .

[29]  Jong Wan Hu Seismic performance evaluations and analyses for composite moment frames with smart SMA PR-CFT connections , 2008 .

[30]  Gregory L. Fenves,et al.  Feasibility Assessment of an Innovative Isolation Bearing System with Shape Memory Alloys , 2009 .