Assessment of learning, for learning, and as learning: New Zealand case studies

Research about the benefits of formative assessment as a means of improving student learning has encouraged policy‐makers and teachers in countries like the UK, Australia and New Zealand to promote and use classroom‐based assessment for learning in the qualifications arena. However, recent research suggests teachers are implementing a narrow interpretation of formative assessment in classrooms using techniques that focus on assessment procedures and practices to assure students comply with criteria and achieve awards for external qualifications. This variation on ‘teaching to the test’ has led to the coining of the phrase ‘assessment as learning’ to indicate the instrumentalism that results from such restricted practice. This paper reports on findings from case studies of two schools in New Zealand where secondary school students are learning how to perform science investigations under direction, for a curriculum standard that is a component of a national standards‐based qualification. The findings reveal that students’ assessment and learning experiences reflect the emerging international trend of ‘assessment as learning’, but strategies for redressing some of the undesirable aspects of this limiting form of formative assessment in this New Zealand context are identified.

[1]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[2]  Susan M. Brookhart,et al.  Successful Students' Formative and Summative Uses of Assessment Information , 2001 .

[3]  J. Pryor,et al.  Developing Formative Assessment in the Classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory , 2001 .

[4]  D. Lange Tomorrow's schools : the reform of education administration in New Zealand , 1988 .

[5]  Paul Black,et al.  Dreams, Strategies and Systems: Portraits of assessment past, present and future , 2001 .

[6]  E. Hargreaves Assessment for learning? Thinking outside the (black) box , 2005 .

[7]  Challenging the myths. , 2006, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[8]  Anne Goldsworthy,et al.  What Is Not Fair with Investigations , 1999 .

[9]  Jere Brophy,et al.  Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation in education: Developing appreciation for.. , 1999 .

[10]  W. Harlen,et al.  Testing and Motivation for Learning , 2003 .

[11]  Shirley Clarke Unlocking formative assessment : practical strategies for enhancing pupils' learning in the primary classroom , 2001 .

[12]  Bethan Marshall,et al.  How teachers engage with Assessment for Learning: lessons from the classroom , 2006 .

[13]  Geoff Hayward,et al.  Modular mayhem? A case study of the development of the A‐level science curriculum in England , 2007 .

[14]  Brian E. Woolnough,et al.  Practical Work in School Science: The Dominance of Assessment. , 2002 .

[15]  Kathryn Ecclestone,et al.  Commitment, compliance and comfort zones: the effects of formative assessment on vocational education students’ learning careers , 2007 .

[16]  C. Palau,et al.  ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION , 2015 .

[17]  Tom Carney Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1991 .

[18]  Norman Reid,et al.  Open-ended problem solving in school chemistry: A preliminary investigation , 2002 .

[19]  Judith Bell,et al.  教育与社科研究入门指南(第三版) = Doing Your Research Project , 1999 .

[20]  Paul Black,et al.  Inside Science Education Reform: A History of Curricular and Policy Change , 2003 .

[21]  G. Nuthall,et al.  Understanding Student Thinking and Learning in the Classroom , 1997 .

[22]  Paul Black,et al.  Learning How to Learn and Assessment for Learning: a theoretical inquiry , 2006 .

[23]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[24]  Assessment in post‐secondary education and training: editorial introduction , 2007 .

[25]  Ros Roberts Using different types of practical within a problem-solving model of science , 2004 .

[26]  J. Stanley,et al.  Book Review: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1957 .

[27]  David Boud,et al.  The Impact of Self-assessment on Achievement: The effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations , 2003 .

[28]  H. Barr,et al.  The effects of curricula and assessment on pedagogical approaches and on educational outcomes , 2005 .

[29]  P. Scott,et al.  Individual and Sociocultural Views of Learning in Science Education , 2003 .

[30]  Karen Vaughan,et al.  Learning Curves: Meeting student learning needs in an evolving qualifications regime Shared pathways and multiple tracks: A second report , 2004 .

[31]  D. Hodson Laboratory work as scientific method: three decades of confusion and distortion , 1996 .

[32]  Mike Watts,et al.  Science in the national curriculum , 1991 .

[33]  Derek Hodson,et al.  Assessment of practical work , 1992 .

[34]  D. Sadler Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems , 1989 .

[35]  T. Crooks Educational Assessment in New Zealand Schools , 2002 .

[36]  Richard Gott,et al.  The place of investigations in practical work in the UK National Curriculum for Science , 1995 .

[37]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[38]  Harry Torrance Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post‐secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. 1 , 2007 .

[39]  S. Brookhart,et al.  'I Don't Like Writing. It Makes My Fingers Hurt': Students talk about their classroom assessments , 2003 .

[40]  D. Royce Sadler,et al.  Perils in the meticulous specification of goals and assessment criteria , 2007 .

[41]  S. Kemmis,et al.  Re‐thinking case study: notes from the second Cambridge Conference , 1976 .