The effects of incomplete breath‐holding on 3D MR Image Quality

The purpose of this study was to investigate how fast three‐dimensional (3D) MR image quality is affected by breath‐holding and to develop an optimal breath‐holding strategy that minimizes artifact in the event of an incomplete breath‐hold. A computer model was developed to study variable‐duration breath‐holds during fast 3D imaging. Modeling was validated by 3D gradient‐echo imaging performed on 10 volunteers. Signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and image blur were measured for both simulated and clinical images. Insights gained were applied to clinical 3D gadolinium‐enhanced MR angiography. Breath‐holding significantly improved abdominal 3D MR image quality. Most of this benefit could be achieved with a breath‐hold fraction of 50% if it occurred during acquisition of central k space. Breath‐holding during peripheral k‐space acquisition, however, had no significant benefit. Respiratory motion artifact on fast 3D MRI occurring when a patient fails to suspend respiration for the entire scan duration can be minimized by collecting central k space first (centric acquisition) so that premature breathing affects only the acquisition of peripheral k space.

[1]  L. Axel,et al.  Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and the renal and other visceral abdominal arteries. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  T L Chenevert,et al.  The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k‐space acquisition order on three‐dimensional MR angiography image quality , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  E. Haacke,et al.  Pseudo‐gating: Elimination of periodic motion artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging without gating , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  S J Riederer,et al.  The importance of phase‐encoding order in ultra‐short TR snapshot MR imaging , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Kim Butts,et al.  The Effect of Respiration on the Contrast and Sharpness of Liver Lesions in MRI , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  S J Riederer,et al.  Centric phase‐encoding order in three‐dimensional MP‐RAGE sequences: Application to abdominal imaging , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  J Listerud,et al.  Multi‐Slice, Breathhold Imaging of the Lung with Submillisecond Echo Times , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  E M Haacke,et al.  Reducing motion artifacts in two-dimensional Fourier transform imaging. , 1986, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9]  J N Lee,et al.  MR fluoroscopy: Technical feasibility , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  G C McKinnon,et al.  Breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography. , 1996, Radiology.

[11]  T. Chenevert,et al.  Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. , 1995, Radiology.

[12]  R L Ehman,et al.  Altered phase‐encoding order for reduced sensitivity to motion in three‐dimensional MR imaging , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Suppression of respiratory motion artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. , 1986, Medical physics.

[14]  R. Jones,et al.  Approach to equilibrium in snapshot imaging. , 1990, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  D. Hough,et al.  Comparison of breath-hold fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo pulse sequences for T2-weighted MR imaging of liver lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[16]  V M Runge,et al.  Fast imaging and other motion artifact reduction schemes: a pictorial overview. , 1988, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[17]  R. Henkelman Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. , 1985, Medical physics.

[18]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Overcoming motion in abdominal MR imaging. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  J. Felmlee,et al.  Adaptive technique for high-definition MR imaging of moving structures. , 1989, Radiology.

[20]  A. Shetty,et al.  Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography in a single breath-hold: a novel technique. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  W. J. Matchett,et al.  Azotemia: gadopentetate dimeglumine as contrast agent at digital subtraction angiography. , 1996, Radiology.