Contributing to sustainability education of east asian university students through a field trip experience: A social-ecological perspective

This study reports the effects of a field trip environmental education program with a social-ecological perspective on the experience and learning of university students from China, Japan, South Korea and Vietnam. The students visited Jeju Island, the Saemangeum Sea Dike, the Demilitarized Zone and Seoul, South Korea. Their experiences and learning about social-ecological interactions were analyzed using the new environmental paradigm test, an evaluation questionnaire, group presentations and individual reports. Across demographic characteristics, the participants believed the program fairly presented the concept of social-ecological systems. Some developed new ideas of social-ecological systems through interpreting, transforming and contextualizing their field trip experience based on prior knowledge bases; others compared the sites to case studies. They preferred the sites where social-ecological issues were clearly presented by well-preserved landscapes, successful environmental management or environmental conflict. The results show the need for an advanced multi-dimensional methodology to evaluate students’ learning through constructive processes. The program design of this study from planning to field trip and evaluation, the field site design in which regional site resources were organized in a social-ecological context and the analysis of participants’ learning and experiences could contribute to attempts to couple the social-ecological perspective with the practice of sustainability and environmental education in field trip design.

[1]  M. Krasny,et al.  Introduction: Greening in the Red Zone , 2014 .

[2]  J. LaFountain Inc. , 2013, American Art.

[3]  K. Spellman Educating for resilience in the North: building a toolbox for teachers , 2015 .

[4]  M. Krasny,et al.  Toward an ecology of environmental education and learning , 2011 .

[5]  H. T. Tan,et al.  A Collaborative Problem-solving Process Through Environmental Field Studies , 2013 .

[6]  R. Dunlap The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: From Marginality to Worldwide Use , 2008 .

[7]  Robert B. Powell,et al.  Environmental education program evaluation in the new millennium: what do we measure and what have we learned? , 2014 .

[8]  Myung-Rae Cho,et al.  The politics of urban nature restoration: The case of Cheonggyecheon restoration in Seoul, Korea , 2010 .

[9]  W. Zipperer,et al.  Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas , 2001 .

[10]  Ryo Sakurai,et al.  Citizen science: a new approach to advance ecology, education, and conservation , 2015, Ecological Research.

[11]  L. Gunderson Ecological Resilience—In Theory and Application , 2000 .

[12]  Keith B. Lucas,et al.  Theoretical Perspectives on Learning in an Informal Setting , 2003 .

[13]  Dong-Gil Cho,et al.  Status and ecological resource value of the Republic of Korea’s De-militarized Zone , 2005, Landscape and Ecological Engineering.

[14]  Dennis A. Rondinelli,et al.  Environmental citizenship in multinational corporations: social responsibility and sustainable development , 2000 .

[15]  M. Brody Learning in nature , 2005 .

[16]  C. Blackmore What kinds of knowledge, knowing and learning are required for addressing resource dilemmas? A theoretical overview , 2007 .

[17]  C. Blackmore,et al.  Resilience in learning systems: case studies in university education , 2010 .

[18]  M. Monroe,et al.  A Framework for Environmental Education Strategies , 2008 .

[19]  William Scott,et al.  Researching education and the environment: retrospect and prospect , 2006 .

[20]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The “New Environmental Paradigm” , 1978 .

[21]  Ian Robottomt Constructivism in Environmental Education : Beyond Conceptual Change Theory , 2006 .

[22]  R. Plummer Social–ecological resilience and environmental education: synopsis, application, implications , 2010 .

[23]  F. J. Lozano,et al.  Advancing Higher Education for Sustainable Development: international insights and critical reflections , 2013 .

[24]  R. Bazillier,et al.  The Greenwashing Machine: is CSR more than Communication , 2009 .

[25]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Resilience and adaptive cycles , 2002 .

[26]  C. Peng,et al.  Land use change in Asia and the ecological consequences , 2006, Ecological Research.

[27]  B. Hofer,et al.  Dimensionality and Disciplinary Differences in Personal Epistemology. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[28]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment , 1994 .

[29]  I. Fazey Resilience and Higher Order Thinking , 2010 .

[30]  Lisa M. Brady Life in the DMZ: Turning a Diplomatic Failure into an Environmental Success , 2008 .

[31]  Doug Knapp,et al.  Content Evaluation of an Environmental Science Field Trip , 2001 .

[32]  Camelia Rosca,et al.  Using the Urban Environment to Engage Youths in Urban Ecology Field Studies , 2006 .

[33]  Edward B. Barbier,et al.  Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development , 1996 .

[34]  S. O'Brien Indications of environmental literacy: using a new survey instrument to measure awareness, knowledge, and attitudes of university-aged students , 2007 .

[35]  Graeme Auld,et al.  The New Corporate Social Responsibility , 2008 .

[36]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Environmental education for social–ecological system resilience: a perspective from activity theory , 2010 .

[37]  Lee Andresen,et al.  Field‐Based Education: Some Theoretical Considerations , 1988 .

[38]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy , 2009 .

[39]  Ju-Yeon Kim,et al.  Effects of forest therapy camp on quality of life and stress in postmenopausal women , 2016 .

[40]  J. DeWitt,et al.  A Short Review of School Field Trips: Key Findings from the Past and Implications for the Future , 2008 .

[41]  T. Elmqvist,et al.  Civic ecology practices : Participatory approaches to generating and measuring ecosystem services in cities , 2014 .

[42]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[43]  Kazuhiko Takeuchi,et al.  Rebuilding the relationship between people and nature: the Satoyama Initiative , 2010, Ecological Research.

[44]  G. Marten Human Ecology: Basic Concepts for Sustainable Development , 2001 .

[45]  Taciano L. Milfont,et al.  The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes , 2010 .

[46]  T. Milfont,et al.  The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis , 2010 .

[47]  Lisen Schultz,et al.  Learning for resilience? Exploring learning opportunities in biosphere reserves , 2010 .

[48]  C. Brannstrom,et al.  Study Abroad Field Trip Improves Test Performance through Engagement and New Social Networks , 2011 .

[49]  R. Dahl,et al.  Green Washing , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[50]  C. Folke RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES , 2006 .

[51]  Stephen Sterling,et al.  Learning for resilience, or the resilient learner? Towards a necessary reconciliation in a paradigm of sustainable education , 2010 .

[52]  L. DeChano A Multi-Country Examination of the Relationship Between Environmental Knowledge and Attitudes , 2006 .

[53]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide , 2009 .

[54]  Thomas A. Schwandt Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. , 1994 .