Head-up displays assist helicopter pilots landing in degraded visual environments

ABSTRACT Civilian rotary-wing aircraft pilots typically rely on visual information from the external environment to guide flight, but are increasingly required to operate in degraded visual environments. The current study evaluated the impact of a head-up display (HUD) upon pilot performance, perceived situation awareness and workload. A 2 × 2 repeated measures design required qualified rotary-wing pilots (N = 6) to fly in clear and degraded visual conditions both with and without the HUD. In degraded visual conditions, the HUD significantly improved pilot perceived situation awareness whilst simultaneously reducing workload. Objective flight technical performance data offered preliminary support for a positive change in pilot behaviour when using the HUD in degraded visual conditions.

[1]  Frank Thomas,et al.  Medical helicopters in wilderness search and rescue operations. , 2006, Air medical journal.

[2]  Michael P. Snow,et al.  EFFECT OF PATHWAY-IN-THE-SKY AND SYNTHETIC TERRAIN IMAGERY ON SITUATION AWARENESS IN A SIMULATED LOW-LEVEL INGRESS SCENARIO , 1999 .

[3]  Max Mulder,et al.  Predicting Pilot Task Demand Load During Final Approach , 2009 .

[4]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Extending helicopter operations to meet future integrated transportation needs. , 2016, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams , 2008 .

[6]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Situation awareness and safety: Contribution or confusion? Situation awareness and safety editorial , 2013 .

[7]  N. Stanton,et al.  Is situation awareness all in the mind? , 2010 .

[8]  Walter W. Johnson,et al.  Visual cues in low-level flight - Implications for pilotage, training, simulation, and enhanced/synthetic vision systems , 1992 .

[9]  H.-U. Doehler,et al.  ALLFlight: a full scale enhanced and synthetic vision sensor suite for helicopter applications , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[10]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Let the Reader Decide , 2015 .

[11]  N A Stanton,et al.  Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology , 2006, Ergonomics.

[12]  Michael P. Snow,et al.  Causes and Remedies of Controlled Flight into Terrain in Military and Civil Aviation , 1999 .

[13]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Stress, Fatigue, Situation Awareness and Safety in Offshore Drilling Crews , 2013 .

[14]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Nasa Synthetic Vision Ege Flight Test , 2002 .

[15]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Kip Smith,et al.  Situation Awareness Is Adaptive, Externally Directed Consciousness , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[17]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  HFACS Analysis of Military and Civilian Aviation Accidents: A North American Comparison , 2004 .

[18]  G. A. French,et al.  Effects of primary flight symbology on workload and situation awareness in a head-up synthetic vision display , 2002, Proceedings. The 21st Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[19]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design , 2012 .

[20]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Why Did the Pilots Shut Down the Wrong Engine? Explaining Errors in Context Using Schema Theory and the Perceptual Cycle Model , 2012 .

[21]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Measuring Situation Awareness in complex systems: Comparison of measures study , 2009 .

[22]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  The future flight deck: Modelling dual, single and distributed crewing options. , 2016, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Head Up versus Head Down: The Costs of Imprecision, Unreliability, and Visual Clutter on Cue Effectiveness for Display Signaling , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[24]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  The development of the Schema-Action-World (SAW) taxonomy for understanding decision making in aeronautical critical incidents , 2017 .

[25]  Amy L. Alexander,et al.  Attentional Tunneling and Task Management in Synthetic Vision Displays , 2009 .

[26]  Joseph C. Hickox,et al.  COMPARISON OF EXPERT AND NOVICE SCAN BEHAVIORS DURING VFR FLIGHT , 2001 .

[27]  James Algina,et al.  A Comparison of Data Analysis Strategies for Testing Omnibus Effects in Higher-Order Repeated Measures Designs , 2002, Multivariate behavioral research.

[28]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple resources and performance prediction , 2002 .

[29]  Michael J. Taber,et al.  Confidence in future helicopter underwater egress performance: An examination of training standards , 2013 .

[30]  Susan P Baker,et al.  Helicopter crashes related to oil and gas operations in the Gulf of Mexico. , 2011, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[31]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Eye-tracking and Individual Differences in off-Normal Event Detection when Flying with a Synthetic Vision System Display , 2004 .

[32]  A. H. Roscoe,et al.  A Subjective Rating Scale for Assessing Pilot Workload in Flight: A decade of Practical Use , 1990 .

[33]  C. Wickens,et al.  Visual scanning and pilot expertise: the role of attentional flexibility and mental model development. , 1997, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[34]  C D Wickens,et al.  Head-Up Displays: Effect of Clutter, Display Intensity, and Display Location on Pilot Performance , 1998 .

[35]  G.J.M. Koeners,et al.  Terrain following and terrain avoidance with synthetic vision , 2005, 24th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[36]  Jarvis J. Arthur,et al.  The Efficacy of Head-Down and Head-Up Synthetic Vision Display Concepts for Retro- and Forward-Fit of Commercial Aircraft , 2004 .

[37]  Ahmet Çakir.  Human performance on the flight deck , 2012, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[38]  James E. Melzer,et al.  HMDs as enablers of situation awareness: the OODA loop and sense-making , 2012, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[39]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Costs and Benefits of Head-Up Display Use: A Meta-Analytic Approach , 1998 .

[40]  M C Waller,et al.  CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL AND BUSINESS AIRCRAFT SYNTHETIC VISION SYSTEMS , 2001 .

[41]  Spencer W. Thomas,et al.  Human Factors Methods. , 1982 .

[42]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Representing distributed cognition in complex systems: how a submarine returns to periscope depth , 2014, Ergonomics.

[43]  Felipe A.C. Nascimento,et al.  Investigating the Truth of Heinrich's Pyramid in Offshore Helicopter Transportation , 2013 .