Mixed versus Pure Display Format in Integration and Nonintegration Visual Display Monitoring Tasks
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C D Wickens,et al. Task-hemispheric integrity in dual task performance. , 1982, Acta psychologica.
[2] C. Wickens,et al. Display Formatting in Information Integration and Nonintegration Tasks , 1987 .
[3] A Pollatsek,et al. Covert Attention and Eye Movements during Reading , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[4] Thomas S. Tullis. Human Performance Evaluation of Graphic and Textual CRT Displays of Diagnostic Data , 1980 .
[5] Paul A Kolers,et al. Specificity of operations in sentence recognition , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.
[6] Paul A. Kolers,et al. Memorial Consequences of Automatized Encoding. , 1975 .
[7] A. Friedman,et al. Hemispheres as independent resource systems: limited-capacity processing and cerebral specialization. , 1981 .
[8] M C Polson,et al. Hemispheres as independent resource systems: limited-capacity processing and cerebral specialization. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[9] Dennis F. Fisher,et al. Reading geometrically transformed text: A developmental approach , 1978 .
[10] C D Wickens,et al. Resources, Confusions, and Compatibility in Dual Axis Tracking: Displays, Controls, and Dynamics , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[11] Robert G Pachella,et al. The Interpretation of Reaction Time in Information-Processing Research 1 , 1973, Human Information Processing.
[12] Christopher D. Wickens,et al. Proximity Compatibility and Information Display: Effects of Color, Space, and Objectness on Information Integration , 1990 .
[13] Christopher D. Wickens,et al. The Structure of Attentional Resources , 1980 .
[14] D. G. Payne,et al. Effects of Speech Intelligibility Level on Concurrent Visual Task Performance , 1994, Human factors.
[15] David G. Payne,et al. Processing deficits in monitoring analog and digital displays: Implications for attentional theory and mental-state estimation research , 1988 .
[16] Christopher D. Wickens,et al. Display Proximity in Multicue Information Integration: The Benefits of Boxes , 1988 .
[17] Robert G. Kinkade,et al. Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design (Revised Edition) , 1972 .
[18] Christopher D. Wickens,et al. Information integration and the object display An interaction of task demands and display superiority , 1987 .
[19] Barry H. Kantowitz,et al. Process Control Simulation Research in Monitoring Analog and Digital Displays , 1981 .
[20] A. Friedman,et al. Dividing attention within and between hemispheres: testing a multiple resources approach to limited-capacity information processing. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[21] D. Allport,et al. On the Division of Attention: A Disproof of the Single Channel Hypothesis , 1972, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[22] D Gopher,et al. Different difficulty manipulations interact differently with task emphasis: evidence for multiple resources. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[23] J M Koonce,et al. Comparison of novice and experienced pilots using analog and digital flight displays. , 1986, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.
[24] Eileen Kowler,et al. Reading twisted text: Implications for the role of saccades , 1987, Vision Research.