Measuring housing preferences using virtual reality and Bayesian belief networks

• A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers.

[1]  M. A. Donggen Wang Conjoint approaches to developing activity-based models , 1998 .

[2]  H. Montgomery,et al.  Belief-value structures as determinants of consumer behaviour: A study of housing preferences and choices , 1989 .

[3]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Planning and Control , 1991 .

[4]  Donggen Wang,et al.  Handling Large Numbers of Attributes and/or Levels in Conjoint Experiments , 2002 .

[5]  Frans M. Dieleman,et al.  From renting to owning: Life course and housing market circumstances , 1994 .

[6]  Robert L. Knight,et al.  Conjoint Preference Estimation for Residential Land Use Policy Evaluation. , 1974 .

[7]  H. Loikkanen Housing demand and tenure choice: Evidence from Finland , 1992 .

[8]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  Decompositional Multiattribute Preference Models in Spatial Choice Analysis: A Review of Some Recent Developments , 1984 .

[9]  J. Henderson,et al.  Tenure Choice and the Demand for Housing , 1986 .

[10]  R. Kempen,et al.  Analysing housing preferences with decision plan nets , 1997 .

[11]  Richard E. Neapolitan,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in expert systems - theory and algorithms , 2012 .

[12]  Pradeep K. Korgaonkar,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of the Predictive Validity of Self-Explicated, Huber-Hybrid, Traditional Conjoint, and Hybrid Conjoint Models , 1983 .

[13]  H. Gill,et al.  Effects of income variability on the demand for owner-occupied housing , 1987 .

[14]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Modeling individual residential preferences: A totally disaggregate approach , 1979 .

[15]  N. Yip,et al.  The Preference for Owner-Occupation , 1993 .

[16]  Thomas P. Boehm,et al.  Tenure choice and expected mobility: A synthesis , 1981 .

[17]  Thomas P. Boehm,et al.  A Hierarchical Model of Housing Choice , 1982 .

[18]  Mark R. Mine,et al.  Working in a Virtual World: Interaction Techniques Used in the Chapel Hill Immersive Modeling Program , 1996 .

[20]  Tom Maver,et al.  Media in Mediation : Prospects for Computer Assisted Design Participation , 2001 .

[21]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  Moving objects in space: exploiting proprioception in virtual-environment interaction , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[22]  Hh Henri Achten,et al.  VR-DIS research programme: Design Systems Group , 2001 .

[23]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems , 1988 .

[24]  Clara H. Mulder,et al.  Housing choice: Assumptions and approaches , 1996 .

[25]  Alan G. Phipps,et al.  Redisential stress and consumption disequilibrium in the Saskatoon housing market , 1989 .

[26]  Philip Steadman,et al.  Architectural morphology : an introduction to the geometry of building plans , 1983 .

[27]  Yannis M. Ioannides,et al.  Dynamic aspects of consumer decisions in housing markets , 1989 .

[28]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Modelling the Choice of Residential Location , 1977 .

[29]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data , 1983 .

[30]  Yong Zhang,et al.  Uniform Design: Theory and Application , 2000, Technometrics.

[31]  Mark Mine,et al.  Moving Cows in Space: Exploiting Proprioception As A Framework For Virtual Envrionment Interaction , 1997 .

[32]  Ta Theo Arentze,et al.  Transport stated choice responses: effects of task complexity, presentation format and literacy , 2003 .

[33]  H. Timmermans,et al.  Context Dependencies in Housing Choice Behavior , 1995 .

[34]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  Measuring user satisfaction for design variations through virtual reality , 2000 .

[35]  D. Haurin Income variability, homeownership, and housing demand , 1991 .

[36]  Peter Haddawy,et al.  An Overview of Some Recent Developments in Bayesian Problem-Solving Techniques , 1999, AI Mag..

[37]  Eje Eric Molin Conjoint modeling approaches for residential group preferences , 1999 .

[38]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  Specification of Individual Residential Utility Functions: A Comparative Analysis of Three Measurement Procedures , 1984 .

[39]  D. Haurin,et al.  A structural model of the demand for owner-occupied housing , 1989 .

[40]  F. Dieleman Households and Housing: Choice and Outcomes in the Housing Market , 1996 .

[41]  Henri Achten,et al.  The Tangible Interface: Experiments as an Integral Part of a Research Strategy , 2003 .

[42]  C. Mulder,et al.  Moving Into Owner-Occupation: Compositional and contextual effects on the propensity to become a homeowner , 1995 .

[43]  de B Bauke Vries,et al.  Virtual Reality CAD system for non-designers : Investigation of user's preferences , 2003 .

[44]  Dennis K. J. Lin,et al.  Ch. 4. Uniform experimental designs and their applications in industry , 2003 .

[45]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Completely Unacceptable Levels in Conjoint Analysis: A Cautionary Note , 1988 .

[46]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  People's beliefs and values as determinants of housing preferences and simulated choices , 1988 .

[47]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  Evaluating Design Alternatives Using Conjoint Experiments in Virtual Reality , 2003 .

[48]  William A. V. Clark,et al.  An Empirical Test of a Joint Model of Residential Mobility and Housing Choice , 1985 .

[49]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[50]  Emma Bijlsma,et al.  Decision plan nets and expert system tools: A new combination for application-oriented modelling of choice behaviour , 1992 .

[51]  H. Timmermans,et al.  Stated preference and choice models applied to recreation research : a review , 1990 .

[52]  J. Louviere,et al.  The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models , 1993 .

[53]  Alun E. Joseph,et al.  Consumer Preferences for Rural Residences: A Conjoint Analysis in Ontario, Canada , 1989 .

[54]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  Housing choice processes: Stated versus revealed modelling approaches , 1994 .

[55]  R. Teas,et al.  A test of the convergent validity of self-explicated and decompositional conjoint measurement , 1992 .

[56]  M. Fischer,et al.  A DISAGGREGATED PROBABILISTIC APPROACH TO A REGULATED HOUSING MARKET WITH EMPHASIS ON THE DEMAND SIDE: THE VIENNA CASE , 2005 .

[57]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  The predictive ability of alternative decision rules in decompositional multiattribute preference models , 1984 .