Testing the metabolic theory of ecology.

The metabolic theory of ecology (MTE) predicts the effects of body size and temperature on metabolism through considerations of vascular distribution networks and biochemical kinetics. MTE has also been extended to characterise processes from cellular to global levels. MTE has generated both enthusiasm and controversy across a broad range of research areas. However, most efforts that claim to validate or invalidate MTE have focused on testing predictions. We argue that critical evaluation of MTE also requires strong tests of both its theoretical foundations and simplifying assumptions. To this end, we synthesise available information and find that MTE's original derivations require additional assumptions to obtain the full scope of attendant predictions. Moreover, although some of MTE's simplifying assumptions are well supported by data, others are inconsistent with empirical tests and even more remain untested. Further, although many predictions are empirically supported on average, work remains to explain the often large variability in data. We suggest that greater effort be focused on evaluating MTE's underlying theory and simplifying assumptions to help delineate the scope of MTE, generate new theory and shed light on fundamental aspects of biological form and function.

[1]  Haruhiko Itagaki,et al.  Ontogenetic Scaling of Metabolism, Growth, and Assimilation: Testing Metabolic Scaling Theory with Manduca sexta Larvae , 2012, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[2]  Joshua S Weitz,et al.  Allometric covariation: a hallmark behavior of plants and leaves. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[3]  Sean T. Hammond,et al.  Computer simulations support a core prediction of a contentious plant model. , 2012, American journal of botany.

[4]  J. Weitz,et al.  Scaling and structure of dicotyledonous leaf venation networks. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[5]  Yunlong Huo,et al.  Intraspecific scaling laws of vascular trees , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[6]  V. Savage,et al.  Systematic variation in the temperature dependence of physiological and ecological traits , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  D D Smith,et al.  Hydraulic trade-offs and space filling enable better predictions of vascular structure and function in plants , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  J. Weitz,et al.  The metabolic theory of ecology: prospects and challenges for plant biology. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[9]  N. Isaac,et al.  Scaling of basal metabolic rate with body mass and temperature in mammals. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[10]  A. Kerkhoff,et al.  Biological stoichiometry of plant production: metabolism, scaling and ecological response to global change. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[11]  Eric J. Deeds,et al.  Curvature in metabolic scaling , 2010, Nature.

[12]  D. S. Glazier.  A unifying explanation for diverse metabolic scaling in animals and plants , 2010, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[13]  A. P. Abaimov,et al.  Mixed-power scaling of whole-plant respiration from seedlings to giant trees , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  B. Enquist,et al.  Advancing the metabolic theory of biodiversity. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[15]  Joshua S Weitz,et al.  Evaluating scaling models in biology using hierarchical Bayesian approaches , 2009, Ecology letters.

[16]  A. P. Allen,et al.  Towards an integration of ecological stoichiometry and the metabolic theory of ecology to better understand nutrient cycling. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[17]  Geoffrey B. West,et al.  A general quantitative theory of forest structure and dynamics , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  James H Brown,et al.  Extensions and evaluations of a general quantitative theory of forest structure and dynamics , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  V. Savage,et al.  An integrative framework for stochastic, size-structured community assembly , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Han Olff,et al.  Revisiting the evolutionary origin of allometric metabolic scaling in biology , 2008 .

[21]  J. Harte,et al.  Maximum entropy and the state-variable approach to macroecology. , 2008, Ecology.

[22]  Eric J. Deeds,et al.  Sizing Up Allometric Scaling Theory , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  Lawren Sack,et al.  Scaling of xylem vessels and veins within the leaves of oak species , 2008, Biology Letters.

[24]  B. Enquist,et al.  The relationship between stem and branch wood specific gravity and the ability of each measure to predict leaf area. , 2008, American journal of botany.

[25]  Federico Magnani,et al.  Sanio's laws revisited. Size-dependent changes in the xylem architecture of trees. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[26]  B. Enquist,et al.  Comment on `A critical understanding of the fractal model of metabolic scaling' , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[27]  J. Dushoff,et al.  Intraspecific Variation and Species Coexistence , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[28]  Charles A Price,et al.  A general model for allometric covariation in botanical form and function , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  J. Lighton,et al.  Scaling of insect metabolic rate is inconsistent with the nutrient supply network model , 2007 .

[30]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Allometric scaling enhances stability in complex food webs. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[31]  James H. Brown,et al.  Life-history evolution under a production constraint , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  J. Chaui-Berlinck.  A critical understanding of the fractal model of metabolic scaling , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[33]  James H. Brown,et al.  Kinetic effects of temperature on rates of genetic divergence and speciation. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  S. Levin,et al.  Size and scaling of predator-prey dynamics. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[35]  Han Olff,et al.  Demystifying the West, Brown & Enquist model of the allometry of metabolism , 2006 .

[36]  Joshua S. Weitz,et al.  Ontogenetically stable hydraulic design in woody plants , 2006 .

[37]  Scaling of mass and morphology in plants with minimal branching: an extension of the WBE model , 2006 .

[38]  Mark G. Tjoelker,et al.  Universal scaling of respiratory metabolism, size and nitrogen in plants , 2006, Nature.

[39]  James H. Brown,et al.  Food-web structure and dynamics: reconciling alternative ecological currencies , 2006 .

[40]  V. Savage,et al.  Biological Scaling and Physiological Time: Biomedical Applications , 2006 .

[41]  D. S. Glazier,et al.  Beyond the ‘3/4‐power law’: variation in the intra‐and interspecific scaling of metabolic rate in animals , 2005, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[42]  J. Kozłowski,et al.  West, Brown and Enquist's model of allometric scaling again: the same questions remain , 2005 .

[43]  Geoffrey B. West,et al.  Yes, West, Brown and Enquist"s model of allometric scaling is both mathematically correct and biologically relevant , 2005 .

[44]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Nitrogen/phosphorus leaf stoichiometry and the scaling of plant growth , 2005 .

[45]  K. McCann,et al.  A Mechanistic Approach for Modeling Temperature‐Dependent Consumer‐Resource Dynamics , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[46]  Tom Ross,et al.  Unifying temperature effects on the growth rate of bacteria and the stability of globular proteins. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[47]  J. Whitfield.  Ecology's Big, Hot Idea , 2004, PLoS biology.

[48]  Frederick R. Adler,et al.  Murray's law and the hydraulic vs mechanical functioning of wood , 2004 .

[49]  James H. Brown,et al.  Toward a metabolic theory of ecology , 2004 .

[50]  A. Clarke.  Is there a Universal Temperature Dependence of metabolism , 2004 .

[51]  A. Clarke,et al.  Why does metabolism scale with temperature , 2004 .

[52]  Jan Kozłowski,et al.  Is West, Brown and Enquist's model of allometric scaling mathematically correct and biologically relevant? , 2004 .

[53]  Geoffrey B. West,et al.  The predominance of quarter-power scaling in biology , 2004 .

[54]  J. Berry,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species , 1980, Planta.

[55]  Thomas H Dawson,et al.  Scaling laws for capillary vessels of mammals at rest and in exercise , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  C. R. White,et al.  Mammalian basal metabolic rate is proportional to body mass2/3 , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  J. Sperry,et al.  Water transport in plants obeys Murray's law , 2003, Nature.

[58]  James H. Brown,et al.  Effects of Size and Temperature on Metabolic Rate , 2001, Science.

[59]  Olaf Ellers,et al.  Scaling in biology , 2001, Complex..

[60]  T. Dawson.  Similitude in the cardiovascular system of mammals. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[61]  J. Weitz,et al.  Re-examination of the "3/4-law" of metabolism. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[62]  James H. Brown,et al.  Quarter-power allometric scaling in vascular plants: functional basis and ecological consequences , 2000 .

[63]  Henry S. Horn.  Twigs, trees, and the dynamics of carbon in the landscape , 2000 .

[64]  A. Clarke,et al.  Scaling of metabolic rate with body mass and temperature in teleost fish , 1999 .

[65]  James H. Brown,et al.  A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems , 1999, Nature.

[66]  Lonnie W. Aarssen,et al.  The interpretation of stem diameter–height allometry in trees: biomechanical constraints, neighbour effects, or biased regressions? , 1999 .

[67]  D. Turcotte,et al.  Networks with side branching in biology. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[68]  D L T,et al.  Networks with Side Branching in Biology , 1998 .

[69]  James H. Brown,et al.  A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology , 1997, Science.

[70]  P. Klinkhamer.  Plant allometry: The scaling of form and process , 1995 .

[71]  K. Niklas.  Size-dependent Allometry of Tree Height, Diameter and Trunk-taper , 1995 .

[72]  Thomas G. Hallam,et al.  Dynamic Energy Budgets in Biological Systems , 1995 .

[73]  G S Kassab,et al.  Morphometry of pig coronary venous system. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[74]  K. Niklas.  Size‐dependent variations in plant growth rates and the “¾‐power rule” , 1994 .

[75]  G S Kassab,et al.  Diameter-defined Strahler system and connectivity matrix of the pulmonary arterial tree. , 1994, Journal of applied physiology.

[76]  G S Kassab,et al.  Morphometry of pig coronary arterial trees. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[77]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Plant Biomechanics: An Engineering Approach to Plant Form and Function , 1993 .

[78]  W. Calder.  Size, Function, and Life History , 1988 .

[79]  K. Schmidt-Nielsen,et al.  Scaling, why is animal size so important? , 1984 .

[80]  R. Peters.  The Ecological Implications of Body Size , 1983 .

[81]  R. Peters,et al.  The effects of body size and temperature on metabolic rate of organisms , 1983 .

[82]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[83]  T. McMahon,et al.  Tree structures: deducing the principle of mechanical design. , 1976, Journal of theoretical biology.

[84]  T. McMahon,et al.  Size and Shape in Biology , 1973, Science.

[85]  M. Rosenzweig.  Net Primary Productivity of Terrestrial Communities: Prediction from Climatological Data , 1968, The American Naturalist.

[86]  T. Kira,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLANT FORM-THE PIPE MODEL THEORY : II. FURTHER EVIDENCE OF THE THEORY AND ITS APPLICATION IN FOREST ECOLOGY , 1964 .

[87]  T. Kira,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLANT FORM-THE PIPE MODEL THEORY : I.BASIC ANALYSES , 1964 .

[88]  A. N. Strahler.  Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology , 1957 .

[89]  M. Friedman,et al.  Essays in Positive Economics , 1954 .

[90]  A. Hemmingsen.  The relation of standard (basal) energy metabolism to total fresh weight of living organisms. , 1950 .

[91]  F. Johnson,et al.  The growth rate of E. coli in relation to temperature, quinine and coenzyme. , 1946, Journal of cellular and comparative physiology.

[92]  R. Horton.  EROSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF STREAMS AND THEIR DRAINAGE BASINS; HYDROPHYSICAL APPROACH TO QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY , 1945 .

[93]  M. Kleiber.  Body size and metabolism , 1932 .

[94]  C. D. Murray.  THE PHYSIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE OF MINIMUM WORK , 1931, The Journal of general physiology.

[95]  C D Murray,et al.  The Physiological Principle of Minimum Work: I. The Vascular System and the Cost of Blood Volume. , 1926, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[96]  D'arcy W. Thompson,et al.  On Growth and Form , 1917, Nature.

[97]  I. Bailey,et al.  Sanio's Laws for the Variation in Size of Coniferous Tracheids , 1915, Botanical Gazette.

[98]  M. Rubner,et al.  Ueber den Einfluss der Körpergrösse auf Stoff- und Kraftwechsel , 1883 .