The effect of leg impedance on stability and efficiency in quadrupedal trotting

Numerous legged robots have demonstrated the effectiveness of tuned leg impedance to achieve dynamically stable running and hopping. However, selecting appropriate impedance values for new machines remains challenging. This paper investigates the effect of joint impedance selection on locomotion stability and efficiency by analyzing a simulation model of the MIT Cheetah quadruped robot performing a trot gait. An exhaustive search of impedance parameters of the knee and hip shows that locomotion stability is highly sensitive to knee impedance and insensitive to hip impedance. Inspection of simulations operating during a ground-height disturbance reveals why: During a disturbance response most of the variation in work performed in the legs occurs in the knee joints. Mechanical work data from the MIT Cheetah exhibits close experimental agreement with the simulation predictions. The exhaustive search also reveals that, within the range of impedance parameters that can achieve stable locomotion, joint impedance values do not have a significant effect on the mechanical cost of transport. These results indicate that the dynamic response of the leg-extension degree of freedom is of primary importance to achieving dynamically stable running, and that robust stability may be achieved with minimal compromise of locomotion efficiency.

[1]  Neville Hogan,et al.  An analysis of contact instability in terms of passive physical equivalents , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  A. Biewener,et al.  Running over rough terrain: guinea fowl maintain dynamic stability despite a large unexpected change in substrate height , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[3]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Modeling posture-dependent leg actuation in sagittal plane locomotion , 2009, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[4]  Albert Wang,et al.  Actuator design for high force proprioceptive control in fast legged locomotion , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[5]  Jonathan E. Clark,et al.  iSprawl: Design and Tuning for High-speed Autonomous Open-loop Running , 2006, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[6]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[7]  H. Benjamin Brown,et al.  c ○ 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. RHex: A Biologically Inspired Hexapod Runner ∗ , 2022 .

[8]  Jonathan E. Clark,et al.  Dynamic stability of variable stiffness running , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  M Mert Ankarali,et al.  Stride-to-stride energy regulation for robust self-stability of a torque-actuated dissipative spring-mass hopper. , 2010, Chaos.

[10]  Hartmut Geyer,et al.  Swing-leg retraction: a simple control model for stable running , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[11]  R J Full,et al.  Templates and anchors: neuromechanical hypotheses of legged locomotion on land. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  N. Hogan,et al.  A Simple State-Determined Model Reproduces Entrainment and Phase-Locking of Human Walking , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  Dong Jin Hyun,et al.  High speed trot-running: Implementation of a hierarchical controller using proprioceptive impedance control on the MIT Cheetah , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[14]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  Dynamic Stability of Open-Loop Hopping , 2007 .

[15]  Jonathan E. Clark,et al.  Stride Period Adaptation for a Biomimetic Running Hexapod , 2001, ISRR.

[16]  Martin Buehler,et al.  Modeling and Experiments of Untethered Quadrupedal Running with a Bounding Gait: The Scout II Robot , 2005, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[17]  C. T. Farley,et al.  Running springs: speed and animal size. , 1993, The Journal of experimental biology.

[18]  Marc H. Raibert,et al.  Legged Robots That Balance , 1986, IEEE Expert.