Predicting Molecular Interactions in Structural Proteomics

Introduction As the number of files in the Protein Data Bank exceeded fifty thousand (representing around ten thousand different protein domains at 95% level of sequence identity), it is becoming increasingly important to start developing the understanding of the protein function and the next level of subcellular structural organization . This, among other aspects, requires understanding of what other biological molecules or cellular structures interact with each domain, which residues are involved in this interaction (e.g. ), and what conformational changes accompany the binging. Structure-based computational approaches to these questions invariably face the issue of protein flexibility, which is further complicated by the existence of unstructured, partially structured, or conditionally structured interfaces . While the dream of predictive milli-second-scale molecular dynamics serving as a “computational microscope” persists (K.Schulten, award lecture at the ISQBP meeting in Ascona, 2008, also ) and may even be getting more tangible as the computers become faster, the ability to make reliable predictions on the basis of such trajectory is still lacking.

[1]  J. Janin,et al.  A dissection of specific and non-specific protein-protein interfaces. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  Barry Honig,et al.  On the role of electrostatic interactions in the design of protein-protein interfaces. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Four-dimensional docking: a fast and accurate account of discrete receptor flexibility in ligand docking. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  Alasdair T. R. Laurie,et al.  Methods for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites for structure-based drug design and virtual ligand screening. , 2006, Current protein & peptide science.

[5]  J. Thornton,et al.  Diversity of protein–protein interactions , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[6]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions , 2002, Proteins.

[7]  M. Sternberg,et al.  The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  Z. Weng,et al.  Protein–protein docking benchmark version 3.0 , 2008, Proteins.

[9]  Krzysztof Fidelis,et al.  Progress from CASP6 to CASP7 , 2007, Proteins.

[10]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[11]  E. Chien,et al.  Structure of a c-Kit Product Complex Reveals the Basis for Kinase Transactivation* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  REVCOM: a robust Bayesian method for evolutionary rate estimation , 2005, Bioinform..

[13]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Computational identification of novel peripheral protein-membrane interactions , 2008 .

[14]  R. Fåhraeus,et al.  In silico-in vitro screening of protein-protein interactions: towards the next generation of therapeutics. , 2008, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[15]  Shoshana J Wodak,et al.  Prediction of protein-protein interactions: the CAPRI experiment, its evaluation and implications. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[16]  S. Jones,et al.  Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  P Argos,et al.  Hydrophobic patches on protein subunit interfaces: Characteristics and prediction , 1997, Proteins.

[18]  M. Lemmon,et al.  Pleckstrin homology (PH) domains and phosphoinositides. , 2007, Biochemical Society symposium.

[19]  David W. Ritchie,et al.  Accelerating and focusing protein-protein docking correlations using multi-dimensional rotational FFT generating functions , 2008, Bioinform..

[20]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  A new method for ligand docking to flexible receptors by dual alanine scanning and refinement (SCARE) , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[21]  Joël Janin Structural genomics: winning the second half of the game. , 2007, Structure.

[22]  Ilya A Vakser PSI has to live and become PCI: Protein Complex Initiative. , 2008, Structure.

[23]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Pocketome via Comprehensive Identification and Classification of Ligand Binding Envelopes* , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[24]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Trp/Met/Phe hot spots in protein-protein interactions: potential targets in drug design. , 2007, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[25]  Tal Pupko,et al.  Structural Genomics , 2005 .

[26]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  Protein-protein association kinetics and protein docking. , 2002, Current Opinion in Structural Biology.

[27]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Detailed ab initio prediction of lysozyme–antibody complex with 1.6 Å accuracy , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.

[28]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Type-II kinase inhibitor docking, screening, and profiling using modified structures of active kinase states. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[30]  Rebecca C Wade,et al.  Biomolecular diffusional association. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[31]  M. Lemmon,et al.  Membrane recognition by phospholipid-binding domains , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[32]  F. Cohen,et al.  An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  M F Lensink,et al.  Recognition-induced conformational changes in protein-protein docking. , 2008, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[34]  A J Olson,et al.  Morphology of protein-protein interfaces. , 1998, Structure.

[35]  B. Kowalski,et al.  Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial , 1986 .

[36]  Daniel R. Caffrey,et al.  Are protein–protein interfaces more conserved in sequence than the rest of the protein surface? , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[37]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Optimal docking area: A new method for predicting protein–protein interaction sites , 2004, Proteins.

[38]  David R Westhead,et al.  Asymmetric mutation rates at enzyme–inhibitor interfaces: Implications for the protein–protein docking problem , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[39]  A. Bogan,et al.  Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Studies of protein‐protein interfaces: A statistical analysis of the hydrophobic effect , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[41]  S. Vajda,et al.  Anchor residues in protein-protein interactions. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  S. Wodak,et al.  Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3–5 shows progress in docking procedures , 2005, Proteins.

[43]  O. Lichtarge,et al.  Evolutionary predictions of binding surfaces and interactions. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[44]  T. Clackson,et al.  A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface , 1995, Science.

[45]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  Intrinsic disorder and functional proteomics. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[46]  N. Gray,et al.  Rational design of inhibitors that bind to inactive kinase conformations , 2006, Nature chemical biology.

[47]  John Moult,et al.  Comparative modeling in structural genomics. , 2008, Structure.

[48]  R. Friesner,et al.  Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[49]  N. Ben-Tal,et al.  ConSurf: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of phylogenetic information. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Prediction of the binding energy for small molecules, peptides and proteins , 1999, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[51]  G. Klebe,et al.  Identification and mapping of small-molecule binding sites in proteins: computational tools for structure-based drug design. , 2002, Farmaco.

[52]  Gideon Schreiber,et al.  Similar chemistry, but different bond preferences in inter versus intra‐protein interactions , 2008, Proteins.

[53]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[54]  Maxim Totrov,et al.  Improving CAPRI predictions: Optimized desolvation for rigid‐body docking , 2005, Proteins.

[55]  J. Thornton,et al.  Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[56]  P. Seeburg,et al.  Structural mechanism for STI-571 inhibition of abelson tyrosine kinase. , 2000, Science.

[57]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Soft protein–protein docking in internal coordinates , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[58]  R Abagyan,et al.  Flexible protein–ligand docking by global energy optimization in internal coordinates , 1997, Proteins.

[59]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[60]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Antibody-antigen interactions: contact analysis and binding site topography. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[61]  Dominique Douguet,et al.  DOCKGROUND system of databases for protein recognition studies: Unbound structures for docking , 2007, Proteins.

[62]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Protein–protein interactions: Structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  Itay Mayrose,et al.  Rate4Site: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of evolutionary determinants within their homologues , 2002, ISMB.

[64]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  PIER: Protein interface recognition for structural proteomics , 2007, Proteins.

[65]  Olivier Sperandio,et al.  Free resources to assist structure-based virtual ligand screening experiments. , 2007, Current protein & peptide science.

[66]  S. Wodak,et al.  Assessment of blind predictions of protein–protein interactions: Current status of docking methods , 2003, Proteins.

[67]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Identification of protein-protein interaction sites from docking energy landscapes. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[68]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  New Method for the Assessment of All Drug-Like Pockets Across a Structural Genome , 2008, J. Comput. Biol..

[69]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Predicting 3D structures of protein-protein complexes. , 2008, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[70]  P Argos,et al.  A method to configure protein side-chains from the main-chain trace in homology modelling. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[71]  R Nussinov,et al.  A proposed structural model for amyloid fibril elongation: domain swapping forms an interdigitating beta-structure polymer. , 2001, Protein engineering.

[72]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[73]  Ting Wang,et al.  Protein–protein docking by simulating the process of association subject to biochemical constraints , 2008, Proteins.

[74]  S. Jones,et al.  Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[75]  D. Covell,et al.  A role for surface hydrophobicity in protein‐protein recognition , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[76]  Barry Honig,et al.  Sequence and structural determinants of strand swapping in cadherin domains: do all cadherins bind through the same adhesive interface? , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[77]  Alfonso Valencia,et al.  Prediction of protein-protein interactions from evolutionary information. , 2003, Methods of biochemical analysis.

[78]  David W Ritchie,et al.  Recent progress and future directions in protein-protein docking. , 2008, Current protein & peptide science.

[79]  Alexander Heifetz,et al.  Protein–protein docking: Progress in CAPRI rounds 6–12 using a combination of methods: The introduction of steered solvated molecular dynamics , 2007, Proteins.

[80]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  Characterization of protein-ligand interaction sites using experimental and computational methods. , 2006, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[81]  Gerhard Klebe,et al.  Identification and Mapping of Small-Molecule Binding Sites in Proteins: Computational Tools for Structure-Based Drug Design. , 2002 .

[82]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Protein-Protein Interactions: Coupling of Structurally Conserved Residues and of Hot Spots across Interfaces. Implications for Docking , 2004 .

[83]  Z. Weng,et al.  Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[84]  S. Jones,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[85]  Huan-Xiang Zhou,et al.  A holistic approach to protein docking , 2007, Proteins.

[86]  Patrick Aloy,et al.  Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[87]  B. Rost,et al.  Analysing six types of protein-protein interfaces. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[88]  C. Chothia,et al.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[89]  Pinak Chakrabarti,et al.  Hydration of protein–protein interfaces , 2005, Proteins.

[90]  K. Schulten,et al.  Single-Molecule Experiments in Vitro and in Silico , 2007, Science.