Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State

Most commentary on the Edward Snowden affair and other recent accounts of government spying leaked in the media has focused on individual privacy concerns, while overlooking how contemporary neoliberal modernity has created a social order in which new surveillance technologies grant the state a degree of power unthinkable to past generations – exceeding in reach and complexity even the totalitarian state imagined in Orwell's dystopian account, 1984. Any critical analysis of the modern surveillance state must move beyond documenting abuses of state power to address how government repression has been allowed to proceed unchecked, and even to flourish, through its support of an antidemocratic public pedagogy produced and circulated via a depoliticizing machinery of fear and consumption. In the USA, repression works through the homogenizing forces of the market as well as a corresponding loss of public memory and political identity to encourage the widespread embrace of an authoritarian surveillance culture. The state and corporate cultural apparatuses now collude to socialize everyone into a surveillance regime, even as personal information is willingly given over to social media and other corporate-based sites as people move across multiple screens and digital apparatuses. It is no longer possible to address the violations committed by the surveillance state without also analysing this broader regime of security and commodification. The authoritarian nature of the corporate–state surveillance apparatus in the USA can only be fully understood when its ubiquitous tentacles are connected to wider cultures of entertainment, commerce and punishment, and the increasing labelling of democratic dissent as an act of terrorism. If democracy is to have a future in America, then it is imperative to organize social movements capable of recovering public memory and reclaiming dissent as essential features of responsible citizenship.

[1]  Rebecca Pero,et al.  Liquid surveillance: A conversation , 2015, New Media Soc..

[2]  S. Aronowitz What Kind of Left Does America Need? , 2014 .

[3]  J. Gilbert What Kind of Thing is ‘Neoliberalism’? , 2013 .

[4]  Sarah Myers,et al.  Ronald J. Deibert, Black Code: Inside the Battle for Cyberspace , 2013 .

[5]  Jonathan Crary,et al.  24/7: Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep , 2013 .

[6]  D. Graeber Dead zones of the imagination , 2012, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory.

[7]  R.G.A. Kaulingfreks,et al.  Collateral Damage : social inequalities in a global age , 2012 .

[8]  Zygmunt Bauman,et al.  Collateral Damage: Social Inequalities in a Global Age , 2011 .

[9]  Henry A. Giroux Zombie Politics and Culture in the Age of Casino Capitalism , 2010 .

[10]  Aaron. Schuman Once upon a time in the West , 2010 .

[11]  Arie Blitz Where is the outrage? , 2010, The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ.

[12]  J. Pontious On politics. , 2006, The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association.

[13]  Simon Tormey,et al.  The Individualized Society , 2003 .

[14]  Robert S. Singh The Farrakhan Phenomenon: Race, Reaction, and the Paranoid Style in American Politics , 1997 .

[15]  M. Castells The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[16]  R. I. Simon,et al.  Forms of insurgency in the production of popular memories: The Columbus quincentenary and the pedagogy of counter-commemoration , 1993 .

[17]  W. Churchill,et al.  The COINTELPRO Papers: Documents from the FBI's Secret Wars Against Dissent in the United States , 1990 .

[18]  Hannah Arendt,et al.  Men in Dark Times , 1968 .

[19]  Valentine,et al.  The Age Of Conformity , 1954 .