Major project team learning: examining building information modelling

The speed of technological advancement of software development drives the need for individual and team learning to exploit these developments for competitive advantage. Using a major long term redevelopment as a case study a review of learning processes and project team learning in the context of a voluntary approach to adopting of BIM prior to 2016 is examined. The speed of adoption of BIM across a large redevelopment project covering several years is variable and the differences of preparedness between team members from different organisations raises the question of how effective the project team can be in sharing learning and increasing the speed of adoption of BIM. The benefits of understanding the project environment as a formal learning context are recognised where teams are working in partnering arrangements but the focus is usually on post project review of what went wrong with little time to critically evaluate other variables. Knowledge Management has the potential to help understand and then facilitate greater participation amongst stakeholders in project team learning. The research team undertook decision mapping and knowledge elicitation techniques and applied these to the Dundee Waterfront to identify key factors relevant to successful project management, enabling the Waterfront Project Team to understand current practice. The effectiveness of project team learning in relation to BIM within this long-term major redevelopment is influenced by positive motivational drivers for individuals to learn how to use and apply BIM, the level of organisational support for learning and professional development and the project information and communication systems. In practice the current approach to sharing of knowledge within the project team indicates a fragmented approach in relation to the adoption and application of BIM to managing construction projects.

[1]  Bhargav Dave,et al.  Collaborative knowledge management—A construction case study , 2009 .

[2]  Eric Wargo,et al.  Psychological Science in the Public Interest , 2006 .

[3]  D. Kolb,et al.  Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education , 2005 .

[4]  David A. Kolb,et al.  Developing teams using the Kolb Team Learning Experience , 2005 .

[5]  Patricia M. Carrillo,et al.  Lessons learned practices in the engineering, procurement and construction sector , 2005 .

[6]  Zhulin Wang,et al.  Building information modeling-enhanced team-based learning in construction education , 2013, 2013 12th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET).

[7]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  STEPS: a knowledge management maturity roadmap for corporate sustainability , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[8]  Marjan Grootveld,et al.  A framework for evaluating knowledge-mapping tools , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[9]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Leadership capacity in teams , 2004 .

[10]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[11]  Christopher R. Madan,et al.  Toward a common theory for learning from reward, affect, and motivation: the SIMON framework , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[12]  Euiho Suh,et al.  Knowledge flow-based business process redesign: applying a knowledge map to redesign a business process , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[13]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[14]  R. Vince Behind and Beyond Kolb's Learning Cycle , 1998 .

[15]  Hervé Leblanc,et al.  PARADIGM INTERPLAY TO DEVELOP A SUSTAINABILITY RELATED KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY , 2012 .

[16]  Francisco Loforte Ribeiro,et al.  Enhancing knowledge management in construction firms , 2009 .

[17]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  The Study of Groups: Past, Present, and Future , 2000 .

[18]  Saumyendu Ghosh,et al.  Identifying areas of knowledge governance for successful projects , 2012 .

[19]  Richard Ennals,et al.  Knowledge management in construction companies in the UK , 2009, AI & SOCIETY.

[20]  C. Anumba,et al.  Integrated use of technologies and techniques for construction knowledge management , 2007 .

[21]  Yu-Cheng Lin,et al.  Developing project communities of practice-based knowledge management system in construction , 2012 .

[22]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Case study of knowledge management implementation in a medium-sized construction sector firm , 2012 .

[23]  K. Sutcliffe,et al.  Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  Charles Egbu,et al.  Knowledge mapping and knowledge communication in decision making and for providing effective solutions for a sustainable urban environment , 2006 .

[25]  Sepani Senaratne,et al.  Linking Individual, Team and Organizational Learning in Construction Project Team Settings , 2011 .

[26]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Knowledge management practices in large construction organisations , 2005 .

[27]  Gilbert Probst,et al.  Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail , 2008 .

[28]  Co Egbu,et al.  Exploitation of knowledge mapping benefits in the facilities performance evaluation process: A conceptual framework , 2010 .

[29]  Grant K. Kululanga Construction process improvement through cognitive power under team generative learning , 2009 .

[30]  Renate Fruchter,et al.  Methodology for usability evaluation of corporate memory design reuse systems , 2006 .

[31]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Learning Styles , 2008, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[32]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[33]  R. Falconer,et al.  A knowledge map of sustainability for urban redevelopment projects , 2014 .

[34]  J. P. Seward Introduction to a theory of motivation in learning. , 1952, Psychological review.