Regeneration of segmental diaphyseal defects in sheep tibiae using resorbable polymeric membranes: a preliminary study.

OBJECTIVE To investigate whether a long bone cortex of well-defined thickness can be regenerated by using an anatomically designed membranous resorbable "tube-in-tube" implant and to establish the functions of membranes in the healing of segmental diaphyseal bone defects larger than the "critical size." DESIGN Bone healing in segmental diaphyseal defects larger than the critical size in the sheep tibiae covered with a single porous tubular membrane or implanted with anatomically shaped porous double tube-in-tube membranes was evaluated. Membranes with different pore structures were applied alone and/or in combination with autogenous bone graft. BACKGROUND Healing of segmental diaphyseal bone defects in animals can be enhanced by covering the defects with resorbable polylactide membranes. Based on the results of bone healing in defects ten millimeters long in the rabbit radii, it was suggested that the membrane prevents muscle and soft tissue from invading the defect and maintains osteogenic cells and osteogenic substances within the space covered with membrane, thus promoting new bone formation. The functions of membranes may differ, however, depending on the size and the location of the defect and on the experimental species used. Bone defects larger than the critical size may not heal at all, even if membranes are used. The critical-size defect is defined as the smallest bone defect that does not heal spontaneously when covered with polymeric membranes. To heal such defects, it is mandatory that membranes are used in combination with autogenic bone graft and/or a suitable bone substitute. If bone graft is used to fill the defect, the structure and geometry of the covering membrane will determine whether the graft will be vascularized and/or nourished from the surrounding soft tissue and, in consequence, survive. It can be appreciated that bone healing in areas of good vascularity should be more efficient than bone healing in poorly vascularized areas. The influence of all these factors on healing of bone in segmental diaphyseal defects covered with membranes is not known. METHODS Four-centimeter-long diaphyseal segmental defects in the tibiae of six- to seven-year-old Swiss mountain sheep were covered with resorbable membranes from poly(LDL-lactide). In Group 1, a single microporous external membrane was used. In Group 2, one microporous membrane was inserted into the medullary cavity at the cut ends of the tibiae (internal membrane), and the other microporous membrane was placed on the outer surface of the cortex (external membrane). In Group 3, a single microporous external membrane was also laser-perforated to produce openings with a diameter in the range of 800 to 900 micrometers. In Group 4, the defect was filled with autogenous cancellous bone graft and covered with a single perforated membrane. In Group 5, one perforated internal membrane was inserted into the medullary cavity at the cut ends of the tibiae, and the other perforated membrane was placed on the outer surface of the cortex. Group 6 was identical to Group 5, except that cancellous bone graft was placed in the space between these two membranes. RESULTS There was no bone healing in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 5. Only in Groups 4 and 6 did the defects heal. In Group 4, new bone was dispersed across the "medullary canal" formed by the membrane. In Group 6, the new bone had grown into the space between the outer and inner membranes, forming the "neocortex." CONCLUSIONS The resorbable polymeric implant consisting of two concentric perforated membranes (the tube-in-tube implant) used in combination with cancellous bone graft to treat segmental diaphyseal defects in sheep tibiae allows for the reconstitution of the "neocortex" with well-defined thickness. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

[1]  S. Gogolewski,et al.  Regeneration of diaphyseal bone defects using resorbable poly(L/DL-lactide) and poly(D-lactide) membranes in the Yucatan pig model. , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[2]  S. Gogolewski,et al.  Long-term in vivo degradation and bone reaction to various polylactides. 1. One-year results. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[3]  S. Gogolewski,et al.  Long-term soft tissue reaction to various polylactides and their in vivo degradation , 1996 .

[4]  S. Gogolewski,et al.  Bone regeneration with resorbable polymeric membranes. III. Effect of poly(L-lactide) membrane pore size on the bone healing process in large defects. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[5]  E. Solheim,et al.  Guided tissue regeneration using degradable and nondegradable membranes in rabbit tibia , 1993 .

[6]  S. Perren,et al.  Tissue response and in vivo degradation of selected polyhydroxyacids: polylactides (PLA), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHB/VA). , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[7]  S. Gogolewski,et al.  Guided tissue regeneration using biodegradable membranes of polylactic acid or polyurethane. , 1992, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[8]  S. Gogolewski,et al.  Biodegradable guide for bone regeneration. Polyurethane membranes tested in rabbit radius defects. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[9]  E. Sudmann,et al.  Bone induction by composite of bioerodible polyorthoester and demineralized bone matrix in rats. , 1991, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[10]  H. Ohgushi,et al.  Bonding osteogenesis in coralline hydroxyapatite combined with bone marrow cells. , 1991, Biomaterials.

[11]  S. Nyman,et al.  Healing of Bone Defects by Guided Tissue Regeneration , 1988, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  J O Hollinger,et al.  Biodegradable bone repair materials. Synthetic polymers and ceramics. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  J O Hollinger,et al.  The critical size defect as an experimental model for craniomandibulofacial nonunions. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  D. S. Metsger,et al.  Tricalcium phosphate ceramic--a resorbable bone implant: review and current status. , 1982, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[15]  C. Bassett,et al.  Activation of the resting periosteum. , 1977, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  C. Bassett,et al.  Repair and remodeling in Millipore-isolated defects in cortical bone. , 1967, Acta anatomica.

[17]  K. Heiple,et al.  A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE HEALING PROCESS FOLLOWING DIFFERENT TYPES OF BONE TRANSPLANTATION. , 1963, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  W. J. Linghorne THE SEQUENCE OF EVENTS IN OSTEOGENESIS AS STUDIED IN POLYETHYLENE TUBES , 1960, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  S M Perren,et al.  Bone regeneration with resorbable polymeric membranes: treatment of diaphyseal bone defects in the rabbit radius with poly(L-lactide) membrane. A pilot study. , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[20]  J. Wyatt,et al.  The management of penile zip entrapment in children. , 1994, Injury.

[21]  A. Froimson,et al.  Autogenous bone marrow and allograft replacement of bone defects in the hand and upper extremities. , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[22]  J O Hollinger,et al.  The critical size defect as an experimental model to test bone repair materials. , 1990, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[23]  G A Ilizarov,et al.  The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  V. Ritsilä,et al.  Behaviour of cancellous bone graft with and without periosteal isolation in striated muscle. An experimental study. , 1988, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[25]  A. Weiland Current concepts review: vascularized free bone transplants. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  R. Browne,et al.  Hydroxyapatite as a bone substitute in the jaws. , 1981, Biomaterials.