Robust Autopilot for a Quasi-Linear Parameter-Varying Missile Model

A sideslip velocity autopilot is designed for a model of a tactical missile, and robust stability of the closed-loop system is investigated. The tail-controlled missile in the cruciform e n cone guration is modeled as a second-order quasi-linear parameter-varying system. This nonlinear model is obtained from the Taylor linearized model of the horizontal motion by including explicit dependence of the aerodynamic derivatives on a state (sideslip velocity ) and external parameters (longitudinal velocity and roll angle ). The autopilot design is based on input ‐output pseudolinearization, which is the restriction of input ‐output feedback linearization to the set of equilibria of the nonlinear model. The design makes Taylor linearization of the closed-loop system independent of the choice of equilibria. Thus, iftheoperating points are in thevicinity of the equilibria, then only onelinear model will describe closed-loop dynamics, regardless of the rate of change of the operating points. Simulations for constant lateral acceleration demands show good tracking with fast response time. Parametric and H1 stability margins for uncertainty in the controller parameters and aerodynamic derivatives are analysed using Kharitonov’ s approach. The analysis shows that the design is fairly robust with respect to both kinds of uncertainty.

[1]  Douglas A. Lawrence A general approach to input-output pseudolinearization for nonlinear systems , 1998, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[2]  W. Rugh,et al.  Input-output pseudolinearization for nonlinear systems , 1994, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[3]  S. Behtash,et al.  Design of controllers for linear parameter-varying systems by the gain scheduling technique , 1992 .

[4]  Alberto Isidori,et al.  Nonlinear control systems: an introduction (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[5]  Jianliang Wang,et al.  Parameterized linear systems and linearization families for nonlinear systems , 1987 .

[6]  C. Reboulet,et al.  A new method for linearizing non-linear systems : the pseudolinearization† , 1984 .

[7]  A. Isidori Nonlinear Control Systems , 1985 .

[8]  Kevin A. Wise,et al.  A Comparison of Six Robustness Tests Evaluating Missile Autopilot Robustness to Uncertain Aerodynamics , 1992, 1990 American Control Conference.

[9]  J. Ackermann,et al.  Robust control , 2002 .

[10]  M P Horton Autopilots for Tactical Missiles: An Overview , 1995 .

[11]  Theodore E. Djaferis Robust Control Design: A Polynomial Approach , 1995 .

[12]  Jeff S. Shamma,et al.  Gain-Scheduled Missile Autopilot Design Using Linear Parameter Varying Transformations , 1993 .

[13]  Michael Athans,et al.  Analysis of gain scheduled control for nonlinear plants , 1990 .

[14]  Pramod P. Khargonekar,et al.  On the control of linear systems whose coefficients are functions of parameters , 1984 .

[15]  W. Baumann,et al.  Feedback control of nonlinear systems by extended linearization , 1986 .

[16]  Michael Athans,et al.  Guaranteed properties of gain scheduled control for linear parameter-varying plants , 1991, Autom..

[17]  Munther A. Dahleh,et al.  An overview of extremal properties for robust control of interval plants , 1993, Autom..

[18]  Wilson J. Rugh,et al.  Analytical Framework for Gain Scheduling , 1990, 1990 American Control Conference.

[19]  Theodore E. Djaferis Some Robust Stability Tests , 1995 .