Adventures of Categories: Modelling the Evolution of Categories During Scientific Investigation

Categories are the fundamental components of scientific knowledge and are used in every phase of the scientific process. However, they are often in a state of flux, with new observations, discoveries and changes in our conceptual understanding leading to the birth and death of categories, drift in their identities, as well as merging or splitting. Contemporary research tools rarely support such changes in operationalized categories, neglecting the problem of capturing and utilizing the knowledge lurking behind the process of change. This paper presents a tool -- AdvoCate1 -- that represents the dynamic nature of categories. It allows category evolution to be modelled, while maintaining a category versioning system that captures all the different versions of a category, along with the process of its exploration and evolution through use. This helps us to better understand and communicate different versions of categories and the reasons and decisions behind any changes they undergo. We demonstrate the usefulness of AdvoCate using examples of category evolution from a land cover mapping exercise.

[1]  Mark Gahegan,et al.  A semantic web map mediation service: interactive redesign and sharing of map legends , 2011, SSO '11.

[2]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[3]  Ljiljana Stojanovic,et al.  Methods and tools for ontology evolution , 2004 .

[4]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis , 1986 .

[5]  Harith Alani,et al.  Winnowing Ontologies Based on Application Use , 2006, ESWC.

[6]  Fouad Zablith,et al.  Evolva: A Comprehensive Approach to Ontology Evolution , 2009, ESWC.

[7]  Claus Pahl,et al.  Graph-based discovery of ontology change patterns , 2011 .

[8]  John F. Sowa,et al.  A Dynamic Theory of Ontology , 2006, FOIS.

[9]  Martin Herold,et al.  A joint initiative for harmonization and validation of land cover datasets , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Stefano Spaccapietra,et al.  Conceptual modeling for traditional and spatio-temporal applications - the MADS approach , 2006 .

[11]  Fábio Porto,et al.  Υ-DB: Managing scientific hypotheses as uncertain data , 2014, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[12]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Using Ontological Contexts to Assess the Relevance of Statements in Ontology Evolution , 2010, EKAW.

[13]  Mark Gahegan,et al.  Beyond Tools: Visual Support for the Entire Process of GIScience , 2005 .

[14]  Wamberto Weber Vasconcelos,et al.  ReTAX+: A Cooperative Taxonomy Revision Tool , 2004, SGAI Conf..

[15]  M. Gahegan EXAMINING UNCERTAINTY IN THE DEFINITION AND MEANING OF GEOGRAPHICAL CATEGORIES , 2002 .

[16]  Michel C. A. Klein,et al.  Concept drift and how to identify it , 2011, J. Web Semant..

[17]  Nicola Fanizzi,et al.  Conceptual Clustering and Its Application to Concept Drift and Novelty Detection , 2008, ESWC.

[18]  Tomasz Miksa,et al.  Ontologies for Describing the Context of Scientific Experiment Processes , 2014, 2014 IEEE 10th International Conference on e-Science.

[19]  Natalya F. Noy,et al.  A Component-Based Framework For Ontology Evolution , 2003 .

[20]  P. Langley,et al.  Computational Models of Scientific Discovery and Theory Formation , 1990 .

[21]  Krishna G. Kulkarni,et al.  Temporal features in SQL:2011 , 2012, SGMD.

[22]  F. S. Marvin Process and Reality: an Essay in Cosmology , 1930, Nature.

[23]  Johanna Völker,et al.  A Framework for Ontology Learning and Data-driven Change Discovery , 2005 .

[24]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[25]  A. Whitehead Adventures of ideas , 1933 .

[26]  Alexey Tsymbal,et al.  The problem of concept drift: definitions and related work , 2004 .

[27]  Carlo Curino,et al.  Automating the database schema evolution process , 2012, The VLDB Journal.

[28]  James F. Allen Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals , 1983, CACM.

[29]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Ontology evolution: a process-centric survey , 2013, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[30]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  Recent Advances in Schema and Ontology Evolution , 2011, Schema Matching and Mapping.

[31]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  A Framework for Ontology Evolution in Collaborative Environments , 2006, SEMWEB.

[32]  Mark Gahegan,et al.  Connecting and Synchronizing Scientific Artifacts through the Process of Conceptual Change , 2014, 2014 IEEE 10th International Conference on e-Science.

[33]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .