Using indirect blockmodeling for monitoring students roles in collaborative learning networks

Collaborative learning activities have shown to be useful to address educational processes in several contexts. Monitoring these activities is mandatory to determine the quality of the collaboration and learning processes. Recent research works propose using Social Network Analysis techniques to understand students' collaboration learning process during these experiences. Aligned with that, this paper proposes the use of the indirect blockmodeling network analytic technique for monitoring the behaviour of different social roles played by students in collaborative learning scenarios. The usefulness of this technique was evaluated through a study that analysed the students' interaction network in a collaborative learning activity. Particularly, we tried to understand the structure of the interaction network during that process. Preliminary results suggest that indirect blockmodeling is highly useful for inferring and analysing the students' social roles, when the behaviour of roles are clearly different among them. This technique can be used as a monitoring service that can be embedded in collaborative learning applications.

[1]  Heinz Ulrich Hoppe,et al.  How Do Researchers on Collaboration Technology Collaborate with Each Other? A Social Network Analysis , 2013, CRIWG.

[2]  Thierry Chanier,et al.  How Social Network Analysis can help to Measure Cohesion in Collaborative Distance-Learning , 2003, CSCL.

[3]  Fionn Murtagh,et al.  Ward’s Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering Method: Which Algorithms Implement Ward’s Criterion? , 2011, Journal of Classification.

[4]  Alejandra Martínez-Monés,et al.  DESPRO: A method based on roles to provide collaboration analysis support adapted to the participants in CSCL situations , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Karina L. Cela,et al.  Social Network Analysis in E-Learning Environments: A Preliminary Systematic Review , 2014, Educational Psychology Review.

[6]  Tobias Hecking,et al.  Two Make a Network: Using Graphs to Assess the Quality of Collaboration of Dyads , 2014, CRIWG.

[7]  Cláudia Maria Lima Werner,et al.  Monitoring Collaboration in Software Processes Using Social Networks , 2014, CRIWG.

[8]  María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana,et al.  Monitoring-Aware Learning Design Process: Pilot Studies in Authentic CSCL Scenarios , 2015, Comput. Informatics.

[9]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[10]  Thomas U. Grund,et al.  Network structure and team performance: The case of English Premier League soccer teams , 2012, Soc. Networks.

[11]  Peter A. Gloor,et al.  Social capital increases efficiency of collaboration among Wikipedia editors , 2011, HT '11.

[12]  Ryan A. Rossi,et al.  Role Discovery in Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[13]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  “Brokering” Behavior in Collaborative Learning Systems☆ , 2013 .

[14]  Jörn Altmann,et al.  Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[15]  Allyson Hadwin,et al.  Measurement and assessment in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..