Rational Design of End-Points to Evaluate Performance of the C-MAC D-Blade Videolaryngoscope During Routine and Difficult Intubation Response
暂无分享,去创建一个
Erol Cavus | Volker Dörges | Klaus J. Wagner | Goetz Serocki | E. Cavus | V. Dörges | K. Wagner | Goetz Serocki
[1] B. Bein,et al. First Clinical Evaluation of the C-MAC D-Blade Videolaryngoscope During Routine and Difficult Intubation , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.
[2] N. Flynn,et al. Comparison of the C‐MAC® videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope®, and Airtraq® laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins , 2010, Anaesthesia.
[3] F. Montecchia,et al. Tracheal intubation using a Macintosh laryngoscope or a GlideScope in 15 patients with cervical spine immobilization. , 2003, British journal of anaesthesia.
[4] F. Xue,et al. Rational design of end-points to evaluate performance of the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope during routine and difficult intubation. , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.
[5] Ruben A. Lee,et al. A Comparison of Three Videolaryngoscopes: The Macintosh Laryngoscope Blade Reduces, but Does Not Replace, Routine Stylet Use for Intubation in Morbidly Obese Patients , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.
[6] V. Dörges,et al. Videolaryngoskopie in der präklinischen Notfallmedizin , 2011, Notfall + Rettungsmedizin.
[7] W. Murray,et al. Review of video laryngoscopy and rigid fiberoptic laryngoscopy , 2008, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.
[8] Y. Okuda,et al. Pentax-AWS, a new videolaryngoscope, is more effective than the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with restricted neck movements: a randomized comparative study. , 2008, British journal of anaesthesia.