Leadership and managing conflict in meetings

There is extensive literature describing the characteristics of a good leader in the area of organisational communication and business management. However, the research tends to be based on secondary, survey or reported data, typically interviews and questionnaires. Moreover, the predominant image of a “good” leader tends to be a charismatic, inspirational, decisive, authoritative, ‘hero’. The Language in the Workplace database provides a large corpus of authentic spoken interaction which allows examination of how effective leaders behave in a wide range of face-to-face interactions at work, and identifies a diverse range of leadership styles. The analysis reveals that effective leaders select from a range of strategies available to challenge, contest or disagree with others, paying careful attention to complex contextual factors, including the type of interaction, the kind of community of practice or workplace culture in which they are operating, and the relative seriousness of the issue involved. The analysis identifies four distinct strategies which leaders use to deal with potential conflict. These strategies lie along a continuum from least to most confrontational: Conflict avoidance; diversion; resolution through negotiation; and resolution by authority. The findings suggest that good leaders “manage” conflict: i.e. they choose strategies which address both their transactional and relational goals in order to achieve a desirable outcome.

[1]  C. Kakavá Opposition in Modern Greek discourse: cultural and contextual constraints , 2002 .

[2]  Brad Jackson,et al.  The Hero Manager: Learning from New Zealand's Top Chief Executives , 2001 .

[3]  J. Holmes,et al.  The Community of Practice: Theories and methodologies in language and gender research , 1999, Language in Society.

[4]  John Yen,et al.  Introduction , 2004, CACM.

[5]  K. Parry What the best leaders look like. , 2001 .

[6]  Scott Jacobs,et al.  Maintaining neutrality in dispute mediation: managing disagreement while managing not to disagree , 2002 .

[7]  Sally Helgesen,et al.  The Female Advantage , 1990 .

[8]  Helena Kangasharju Alignment in disagreement: forming oppositional alliances in committee meetings , 2002 .

[9]  Judith Dwyer,et al.  The Business Communication Handbook , 1997 .

[10]  Anna Duszak,et al.  Us and others : social identities across languages, discourses and cultures , 2002 .

[11]  A. Kaufmann Negation and prosody in British English: a study based on the London–Lund Corpus , 2002 .

[12]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[13]  Janet Holmes,et al.  Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work , 2003 .

[14]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[15]  J Brewis,et al.  Understanding gender and organizations , 1998 .

[16]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  Conflict Management Style: Accounting for Cross-National Differences , 1998 .

[17]  T. Bonoma,et al.  Managing Organizational Conflict: A Model for Diagnosis and Intervention , 1979 .

[18]  Penelope Eckert,et al.  New generalizations and explanations in language and gender research , 1999, Language in Society.

[19]  J. Holmes,et al.  Humour as a discursive boundary marker in social interaction , 2002 .

[20]  J. Holmes,et al.  Relational practice in the workplace: Women's talk or gendered discourse? , 2004, Language in Society.

[21]  Jim Murphy Managing Conflict at Work , 1993 .

[22]  Sally Helgesen The female advantage : women's ways of leadership , 1990 .

[23]  Laura K. Guerrero,et al.  MANAGING CONFLICT APPROPRIATELY AND EFFECTIVELY: AN APPLICATION OF THE COMPETENCE MODEL TO RAHIM'S ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT STYLES , 2000 .

[24]  P. Brown,et al.  Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena , 1978 .

[25]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[26]  N. Brewer,et al.  GENDER ROLE, ORGANIZATIONAL STATUS, AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STYLES , 2002 .

[27]  Joyce K. Fletcher,et al.  Disappearing Acts: Gender, Power, and Relational Practice at Work , 2001 .

[28]  Steven E. Clayman Disagreements and third parties: dilemmas of neutralism in panel news interviews , 2002 .

[29]  Janet Holmes,et al.  Having a laugh at work: how humour contributes to workplace culture , 2002 .

[30]  Շուշանիկ Պարոնյան,et al.  Questions and politeness , 2001 .

[31]  Janet Holmes,et al.  Handling Small Talk at Work: Challenges for workers with intellectual disabilities , 2000 .

[32]  Amanda Sinclair,et al.  Doing Leadership Differently: Gender, Power, and Sexuality in a Changing Business Culture , 1998 .

[33]  J. Holmes Women at work: Analysing women’a talk in New Zealand workplaces , 1999 .

[34]  J. Holmes,et al.  The handbook of language and gender , 2003 .