Biomass production potential from Populus short rotation systems in Romania

The aim of this study was to assess the potential of biomass production by short rotation poplar in Romania without constraining agricultural food production. Located in the eastern part of Europe, Romania provides substantial land resources suitable for bioenergy production. The process‐oriented biogeochemical model Landscape DNDC was used in conjunction with the forest‐growth model PSIM to simulate the yield of poplar grown in short‐rotation coppice at different sites in Romania. The model was validated on five sites with different climatic conditions in Central Europe. Using regional site conditions, with climatic parameters and organic carbon content in soil being the most important, the biomass production potential of poplar plantations was simulated for agricultural areas across Romania.

[1]  D. Walker,et al.  Biofuels, facts, fantasy, and feasibility , 2009, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[2]  Peter Stoll,et al.  Effects of abandonment of subalpine hay meadows on plant and invertebrate diversity in Transylvania, Romania , 2006 .

[3]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  Modelling of Photosynthetic Response to Environmental Conditions , 1982 .

[4]  Xin Li,et al.  Parameterization of a coupled CO 2 and H 2 O gas exchange model at the leaf scale of Populus euphratica , 2009 .

[5]  R. Colombo,et al.  Seasonal and interannual patterns of carbon and water fluxes of a poplar plantation under peculiar eco-climatic conditions , 2009 .

[6]  R. Grote.  Integrating dynamic morphological properties into forest growth modelling II Allocation and mortality , 1998 .

[7]  M. Lerdau,et al.  Response of isoprene emission and carbon metabolism to drought in white poplar (Populus alba) saplings. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[8]  C. Gasol,et al.  Water and energy consumption of Populus spp. bioenergy systems: A case study in Southern Europe , 2011 .

[9]  T. Kuemmerle,et al.  Lost in transition: determinants of post-socialist cropland abandonment in Romania , 2009 .

[10]  Bio-Energy Retains Its Mitigation Potential Under Elevated CO2 , 2010, PloS one.

[11]  D. S. Kubien,et al.  Temperature responses of photosynthesis and respiration in Populusbalsamifera L.: acclimation versus adaptation , 2010, Photosynthesis Research.

[12]  Sarah Baum,et al.  The impact of Short Rotation Coppice plantations on phytodiversity , 2009 .

[13]  Carlo Calfapietra,et al.  Canopy profiles of photosynthetic parameters under elevated CO2 and N fertilization in a poplar plantation. , 2005, Environmental pollution.

[14]  Bart Muys,et al.  Poplar growth and yield in short rotation coppice: model simulations using the process model SECRETS , 2004 .

[15]  M. Weih,et al.  Short-rotation forestry with hybrid aspen (Populus tremula L.×P. tremuloides Michx.) in Northern Europe , 2012 .

[16]  Nigel J. Livingston,et al.  On the need to incorporate sensitivity to CO2 transfer conductance into the Farquhar–von Caemmerer–Berry leaf photosynthesis model , 2004 .

[17]  Harald Kunstmann,et al.  Modelling and observation of biosphere–atmosphere interactions in natural savannah in Burkina Faso, West Africa , 2009 .

[18]  W. Post,et al.  Simulated biomass and soil carbon of loblolly pine and cottonwood plantations across a thermal gradient in southeastern United States , 2008 .

[19]  Ben Bond-Lamberty,et al.  Effects of stand age and tree species on canopy transpiration and average stomatal conductance of boreal forests , 2005 .

[20]  Klaus Butterbach-Bahl,et al.  A global inventory of N2O emissions from tropical rainforest soils using a detailed biogeochemical model , 2007 .

[21]  C. Messier,et al.  Negative or positive effects of plantation and intensive forestry on biodiversity: A matter of scale and perspective , 2010 .

[22]  A. Baral,et al.  Trees for carbon sequestration or fossil fuel substitution: the issue of cost vs. carbon benefit , 2004 .

[23]  E. Bonari,et al.  Biomass production and energy balance of a 12‐year‐old short‐rotation coppice poplar stand under different cutting cycles , 2010 .

[24]  A. Gavaland,et al.  Growth and Yield of Mixed Polyclonal Stands of Populus in Short-Rotation Coppice , 2000 .

[25]  T. B. Wigley,et al.  A meta‐analysis of bird and mammal response to short‐rotation woody crops , 2011 .

[26]  Gail Taylor,et al.  Estimating the supply of biomass from short-rotation coppice in England, given social, economic and environmental constraints to land availability , 2010 .

[27]  D. Tenenbaum,et al.  Food vs. Fuel: Diversion of Crops Could Cause More Hunger , 2008, Environmental health perspectives.

[28]  Klaus Butterbach-Bahl,et al.  Regional application of PnET‐N‐DNDC for estimating the N2O source strength of tropical rainforests in the Wet Tropics of Australia , 2005 .

[29]  J. Swinnen,et al.  Property Rights Imperfections, Asset Allocation, and Welfare: Co-Ownership in Bulgaria , 2007 .

[30]  M. Trnka,et al.  Biomass production and survival rates of selected poplar clones grown under a short-rotation system on arable land , 2008 .

[31]  L. Christersson.  Wood production potential in poplar plantations in Sweden , 2010 .

[32]  John O'Loughlin,et al.  Satellite Data Methods and Application in the Evaluation of War Outcomes: Abandoned Agricultural Land in Bosnia-Herzegovina After the 1992–1995 Conflict , 2009 .

[33]  Patrick Lamers,et al.  International bioenergy trade—A review of past developments in the liquid biofuel market , 2011 .

[34]  N. Brüggemann,et al.  Isoprene emission-free poplars--a chance to reduce the impact from poplar plantations on the atmosphere. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[35]  Oliver Brauner,et al.  Animal diversity on short-rotation coppices - a review. , 2009 .

[36]  R. Hüttl,et al.  Growth dynamics and biomass accumulation of 8-year-old hybrid poplar clones in a short-rotation plantation on a clayey-sandy mining substrate with respect to plant nutrition and water budget , 2004, European Journal of Forest Research.

[37]  S. Zhang,et al.  Genotypic variation in wood density and growth traits of poplar hybrids at four clonal trials , 2007 .

[38]  C. Field,et al.  Biomass energy: the scale of the potential resource. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[39]  C. Peng,et al.  Simulating age-related changes in carbon storage and allocation in a Chinese fir plantation growing in southern China using the 3-PG model , 2009 .

[40]  Simone Graeff-Hönninger,et al.  The impact of a growing bioethanol industry on food production in Brazil , 2011 .

[41]  L. Bremer,et al.  Does plantation forestry restore biodiversity or create green deserts? A synthesis of the effects of land-use transitions on plant species richness , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[42]  Volkhard Scholz,et al.  Assessment of nitrogen fertilization for the CO2 balance during the production of poplar and rye , 2010 .

[43]  Michael Battaglia,et al.  Evaluation of a process-based ecosystem model for long-term biomass and stand development of Eucalyptus globulus plantations , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[44]  Reinhart Ceulemans,et al.  Energy and greenhouse gas balance of bioenergy production from poplar and willow: a review , 2011 .

[45]  Pete Smith,et al.  The potential distribution of bioenergy crops in the UK under present and future climate , 2006 .

[46]  Joe Landsberg,et al.  Modelling forest ecosystems: state of the art, challenges, and future directions , 2003 .

[47]  Lutz Breuer,et al.  LandscapeDNDC: a process model for simulation of biosphere–atmosphere–hydrosphere exchange processes at site and regional scale , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[48]  J. Swinnen,et al.  Property rights imperfections and asset allocation: Co-ownership in Bulgaria , 2011 .

[49]  Changsheng Li,et al.  Assessing productivity and carbon sequestration capacity of Eucalyptus globulus plantations using the process model Forest-DNDC: Calibration and validation , 2006 .

[50]  Ian Shield,et al.  Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[51]  R. Rytter.  The potential of willow and poplar plantations as carbon sinks in Sweden , 2012 .

[52]  Matthew J. Aylott,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from four bioenergy crops in England and Wales: Integrating spatial estimates of yield and soil carbon balance in life cycle analyses , 2009 .

[53]  E. Bonari,et al.  Impact on soil quality of a 10-year-old short-rotation coppice poplar stand compared with intensive agricultural and uncultivated systems in a Mediterranean area , 2011 .

[54]  Patrick Hostert,et al.  Patterns and drivers of post-socialist farmland abandonment in Western Ukraine , 2011 .

[55]  M. Johnston,et al.  Hybrid poplar growth in bioenergy production systems: Biomass prediction with a simple process-based model (3PG) , 2010 .

[56]  P. Kahle,et al.  Vertical distribution of soil properties under short-rotation forestry in Northern Germany , 2010 .

[57]  Miguel Espinosa,et al.  A process-based model to evaluate site quality for Eucalyptus nitens in the Bio-Bio Region of Chile , 2009 .

[58]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Post-Soviet farmland abandonment, forest recovery, and carbon sequestration in western Ukraine , 2011 .

[59]  Alan R. Ek,et al.  Process-based models for forest ecosystem management: current state of the art and challenges for practical implementation. , 2000, Tree physiology.

[60]  C. Kollas,et al.  Bioenergy potential in Germany - assessing spatial patterns of biomass production with aspen short-rotation coppice , 2009 .

[61]  J. Kern,et al.  Soil carbon, soil nitrate, and soil emissions of nitrous oxide during cultivation of energy crops , 2010, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[62]  Martin P. Girardin,et al.  Response of tree growth to a changing climate in boreal central Canada: A comparison of empirical, process-based, and hybrid modelling approaches , 2008 .

[63]  Klaus Butterbach-Bahl,et al.  A European-wide inventory of soil NO emissions using the biogeochemical models DNDC/Forest-DNDC , 2009 .

[64]  I. E. Woodrow,et al.  A Model Predicting Stomatal Conductance and its Contribution to the Control of Photosynthesis under Different Environmental Conditions , 1987 .

[65]  Kurt H. Johnsen,et al.  Process Models as Tools in Forestry Research and Management , 2001, Forest Science.

[66]  Rüdiger Grote,et al.  Sensitivity of volatile monoterpene emission to changes in canopy structure: a model-based exercise with a process-based emission model. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[67]  Ralf Kiese,et al.  Modelling forest carbon balances considering tree mortality and removal , 2011 .

[68]  CHANG SHENG,et al.  Regional application of PnET-N-DNDC for estimating the N 2 O source strength of tropical rainforests in the Wet Tropics of Australia , 2004 .

[69]  Michael Battaglia,et al.  Process-based forest productivity models and their application in forest management , 1998 .

[70]  G. Taylor,et al.  Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK , 2009 .

[71]  Per Ambus,et al.  Inventories of N2O and NO Emissions from European Forest Soils , 2005 .

[72]  Tadeusz W Patzek,et al.  Thermodynamics of Energy Production from Biomass , 2005 .

[73]  C. Kollas,et al.  Potentials and impacts of short-rotation coppice plantation with aspen in Eastern Germany under conditions of climate change , 2010 .

[74]  G. Heath,et al.  Environmental and sustainability factors associated with next-generation biofuels in the U.S.: what do we really know? , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[75]  A. Vetter,et al.  15 Jahre Energieholzversuche in Thüringen , 2009 .

[76]  Dieter Gerten,et al.  The economic potential of bioenergy for climate change mitigation with special attention given to implications for the land system , 2011 .

[77]  Keith A. Smith,et al.  N 2 O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels , 2007 .