Dynamic behaviour of steel–concrete composite under-deck cable-stayed bridges under the action of moving loads

Abstract The dynamic response of under-deck cable-stayed bridges with steel–concrete composite decks under moving loads is presented, and different parameters are considered. The vibrational modes with a strong contribution in the response, the key parameters that control the modal frequencies, and those that reduce the maximum accelerations registered on the deck in a cost-effective manner, are identified. It is found that relatively high accelerations occur and that these can be increased by large load eccentricities. It is also found that maximum accelerations are conditioned by the amplification and cancellation speeds of the loads. Increasing the depth of the deck is determined to be the most effective way to reduce the maximum accelerations. Decks formed by I-beams seem to be quite appropriate from the perspective of dynamic behaviour, while box sections tend to increase the overall cost of the bridge. The findings provide effective strategies to define the most efficient configurations that satisfy the limit state of vibrations, which is critical for this type of bridge.

[1]  Jiri Strasky,et al.  Stress Ribbon and Cable-supported Pedestrian Bridges , 2005 .

[2]  C. R. Hendy,et al.  Designers' Guide to EN 1993-2 Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures, Part 2: Steel Bridges , 2007 .

[3]  M Schlaich Erection of Cable-Stayed Bridges Having Composite Decks with Precast Concrete Slabs , 2001 .

[4]  Domenico Bruno,et al.  Dynamic impact analysis of long span cable-stayed bridges under moving loads , 2008 .

[5]  Holger Svensson,et al.  Cable-Stayed Bridges: 40 Years of Experience Worldwide , 2012 .

[6]  M. Holicky,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1990 : Eurocode: Basis of Structural Design , 2002 .

[7]  Ana M. Ruiz-Teran,et al.  Serviceability limit state of vibrations in under-deck cable-stayed bridges accounting for vehicle-structure interaction , 2014 .

[8]  Ana M. Ruiz-Teran,et al.  Structural behaviour and design criteria of under-deck cable-stayed bridges and combined cable-stayed bridges. Part 2: Multispan bridges. , 2008 .

[9]  Yong Lu,et al.  Critical Speed and Resonance Criteria of Railway Bridge Response to Moving Trains , 2013 .

[10]  Eugene J. O'Brien,et al.  Traffic load modelling and factors influencing the accuracy of predicted extremes , 2005 .

[11]  Angel C. Aparicio,et al.  Response of under-deck cable-stayed bridges to the accidental breakage of stay cables , 2009 .

[12]  John F. Fleming,et al.  Dynamic behaviour of a cable‐stayed bridge , 1980 .

[13]  Ana M. Ruiz-Teran Unconventional cable-stayed bridges: structural behaviour and design criteria , 2010 .

[14]  L Frýba,et al.  A rough assessment of railway bridges for high speed trains , 2001 .

[15]  Angel C. Aparicio,et al.  Two new types of bridges: under-deck cable-stayed bridges and combined cable-stayed bridges — the state of the art , 2007 .

[16]  Christos T. Georgakis,et al.  Cable supported bridges concept and design , 2011 .

[17]  René Walther,et al.  Cable stayed bridges , 1988 .

[18]  Michel Virlogeux Recent evolution of cable-stayed bridges , 1999 .

[19]  K. F. Chung,et al.  Composite column design to Eurocode 4 : based on DD ENV 1994-1-1: 1994 Eurocode 4: design of composite steel and concrete structures: part 1.1: general rules and rules for buildings , 1994 .

[20]  Angel C. Aparicio,et al.  Parameters governing the response of under-deck cable-stayed bridges , 2007 .

[21]  Algirdas Juozapaitis,et al.  Unconventional Double-Level Structural System for Under-Deck Cable-Stayed Bridges , 2012 .

[22]  J. Santamarina,et al.  Discrete Signals and Inverse Problems: An Introduction for Engineers and Scientists , 2005 .

[23]  José J. Oliveira Pedro,et al.  Nonlinear analysis of composite steel–concrete cable-stayed bridges , 2010 .

[24]  Ana M. Ruiz-Teran,et al.  Structural behaviour and design criteria of under-deck cable-stayed bridges subjected to seismic action , 2013 .