A Bayesian approach to selecting hyperelastic constitutive models of soft tissue

Abstract Hyperelastic constitutive models of soft tissue mechanical behavior are extensively used in applications like computer-aided surgery, injury modeling, etc. While numerous constitutive models have been proposed in the literature, an objective method is needed to select a parsimonious model that represents the experimental data well and has good predictive capability. This is an important problem given the large variability in the data inherent to soft tissue mechanical testing. In this work, we discuss a Bayesian approach to this problem based on Bayes factors. We propose a holistic framework for model selection, wherein we consider four different factors to reliably choose a parsimonious model from the candidate set of models. These are the qualitative fit of the model to the experimental data, evidence values, maximum likelihood values, and the landscape of the likelihood function. We consider three hyperelastic constitutive models that are widely used in soft tissue mechanics: Mooney–Rivlin, Ogden and exponential. Three sets of mechanical testing data from the literature for agarose hydrogel, bovine liver tissue, porcine brain tissue are used to calculate the model selection statistics. A nested sampling approach is used to evaluate the evidence integrals. In our results, we highlight the robustness of the proposed Bayesian approach to model selection compared to the likelihood ratio, and discuss the use of the four factors to draw a complete picture of the model selection problem.

[1]  William Gropp,et al.  Skjellum using mpi: portable parallel programming with the message-passing interface , 1994 .

[2]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[3]  Richard J. Morris,et al.  Bayesian Model Comparison and Parameter Inference in Systems Biology Using Nested Sampling , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  Sai Hung Cheung,et al.  PARALLEL ADAPTIVE MULTILEVEL SAMPLING ALGORITHMS FOR THE BAYESIAN ANALYSIS OF MATHEMATICAL MODELS , 2012 .

[5]  J. Tinsley Oden,et al.  SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODELS OF TUMOR GROWTH , 2013 .

[6]  S. Chib,et al.  Marginal Likelihood From the Metropolis–Hastings Output , 2001 .

[7]  Tibi Beda,et al.  Modeling hyperelastic behavior of rubber: A novel invariant-based and a review of constitutive models , 2007 .

[8]  Wasserman,et al.  Bayesian Model Selection and Model Averaging. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[9]  R. Willinger,et al.  Shear Properties of Brain Tissue over a Frequency Range Relevant for Automotive Impact Situations: New Experimental Results. , 2004, Stapp car crash journal.

[10]  L. Goddard Information Theory , 1962, Nature.

[11]  J. Berger,et al.  The Intrinsic Bayes Factor for Model Selection and Prediction , 1996 .

[12]  D. Higdon,et al.  Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation by Differential Evolution with Self-Adaptive Randomized Subspace Sampling , 2009 .

[13]  Anthony Skjellum,et al.  Using MPI - portable parallel programming with the message-parsing interface , 1994 .

[14]  J. Beck,et al.  Model Selection using Response Measurements: Bayesian Probabilistic Approach , 2004 .

[15]  F. Feroz,et al.  MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics , 2008, 0809.3437.

[16]  M. Tribus,et al.  Probability theory: the logic of science , 2003 .

[17]  Lambert Speelman,et al.  Local axial compressive mechanical properties of human carotid atherosclerotic plaques-characterisation by indentation test and inverse finite element analysis. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Esra Roan,et al.  Strain rate-dependent viscohyperelastic constitutive modeling of bovine liver tissue , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[19]  A. Gelfand,et al.  Bayesian Model Choice: Asymptotics and Exact Calculations , 1994 .

[20]  M. Coret,et al.  Mechanical characterization of liver capsule through uniaxial quasi-static tensile tests until failure. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  J. Skilling Nested sampling for general Bayesian computation , 2006 .

[22]  R. Trotta,et al.  Hunting Down the Best Model of Inflation with Bayesian Evidence , 2010, 1009.4157.

[23]  Paul T. Bauman,et al.  A computational framework for dynamic data‐driven material damage control, based on Bayesian inference and model selection , 2015 .

[24]  R. Berk,et al.  Limiting Behavior of Posterior Distributions when the Model is Incorrect , 1966 .

[25]  Esra Roan,et al.  Cohesive zone modeling of mode I tearing in thin soft materials. , 2013, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[26]  G. Holzapfel SECTION 10.11 – Biomechanics of Soft Tissue , 2001 .

[27]  Esra Roan,et al.  The nonlinear material properties of liver tissue determined from no-slip uniaxial compression experiments. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[28]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  The Bayesian choice : from decision-theoretic foundations to computational implementation , 2007 .

[29]  Alessandro Nava,et al.  In vivo mechanical characterization of human liver , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[30]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[31]  R. Haut Biomechanics of Soft Tissue , 2002 .

[32]  F. Feroz,et al.  Bayesian selection of sign μ within mSUGRA in global fits including WMAP5 results , 2008, 0807.4512.

[33]  Ming Shen,et al.  A comprehensive experimental study on material properties of human brain tissue. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  J. P. Paul,et al.  Biomechanics , 1966 .

[35]  Nilesh Billade Mechanical characterization, computational modeling and biological considerations for carbon nanomaterial-agarose composites for tissue engineering applications , 2009 .

[36]  Cagatay Basdogan,et al.  A robotic indenter for minimally invasive measurement and characterization of soft tissue response , 2007, Medical Image Anal..

[37]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Fractional Bayes factors for model comparison , 1995 .

[38]  Dominique Poirel,et al.  Bayesian model selection for nonlinear aeroelastic systems using wind-tunnel data , 2014 .

[39]  R. A. Westmann,et al.  MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF , 1970 .

[40]  Heikki Haario,et al.  DRAM: Efficient adaptive MCMC , 2006, Stat. Comput..

[41]  Ichiro Sakuma,et al.  Transversely isotropic properties of porcine liver tissue: experiments and constitutive modelling , 2006, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[42]  Gábor Székely,et al.  Inverse Finite Element Characterization of Soft Tissues , 2001, MICCAI.

[43]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Bayesian uncertainty quantification and propagation for discrete element simulations of granular materials , 2014 .

[44]  S. Geisser,et al.  A Predictive Approach to Model Selection , 1979 .

[45]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  Bayesian computational methods , 2010, 1002.2702.

[46]  Kumar Vemaganti,et al.  Bayesian calibration of hyperelastic constitutive models of soft tissue. , 2016, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[47]  M. Aitkin Posterior Bayes Factors , 1991 .

[48]  R. Trotta Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology , 2008, 0803.4089.

[49]  Doreen Eichel,et al.  Data Analysis A Bayesian Tutorial , 2016 .

[50]  I. Sakuma,et al.  Combined compression and elongation experiments and non-linear modelling of liver tissue for surgical simulation , 2004, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[51]  Ka-Veng Yuen,et al.  Recent developments of Bayesian model class selection and applications in civil engineering , 2010 .

[52]  James O. Berger,et al.  Objective Bayesian Methods for Model Selection: Introduction and Comparison , 2001 .

[53]  J. Beck Bayesian system identification based on probability logic , 2010 .

[54]  M. Gilchrist,et al.  Experimental Characterisation of Neural Tissue at Collision Speeds , 2012 .

[55]  Mary F. Wheeler,et al.  Efficient Bayesian inference of subsurface flow models using nested sampling and sparse polynomial chaos surrogates , 2014 .

[56]  Rogério José Marczak,et al.  A New Constitutive Model for Rubber-Like Materials , 2010 .