Toward implementing a fully automated truck guidance system at a seaport: identifying the roles, costs and benefits of logistics stakeholders

The seaport-hinterland access infrastructures become more saturated leading to extra unpredictable costs for logistics operators. To keep their services competitive, infrastructure managers (such as port authorities) seek new approaches in managing and delivering information to their users. Starting from existing technological advancements and exploring the declared opportunities enabled by (near) future ones, a range of solutions (e.g. real-time information platforms, dynamic information boards or digital on-request notification solutions) can be pursued. This research investigates how an advanced truck guidance system (TGS) leverages on technology and leads to more efficient resource (infrastructure, equipment and labour) usage. The current paper merges two perspectives. The first conducts interviews with representatives of different logistics stakeholders to highlight their data needs. The second perspective is given by a review of information communication technology (ICT) innovative trends. These two perspectives provide an up-to-date overview of both needs (demand) and opportunities (supply) that challenge logistics stakeholders. This study proposes a TGS architecture that merges the two perspectives and identifies a stepwise approach to implement it. Therefore, the roles, costs and benefits brought to the logistics stakeholders are highlighted for each step. The key findings of this study show that road transport operators would benefit from operational savings and increased performance, while the other supply chain stakeholders can benefit from setting up a more reliable planning, better managing their infrastructure and developing added-value services for clients. To enable these benefits, the port administration could take the facilitator role and cover the TGS’s development costs.

[1]  Fred P. Brooks,et al.  The Mythical Man-Month , 1975, Reliable Software.

[2]  Andrew S. Tanenbaum,et al.  Distributed systems: Principles and Paradigms , 2001 .

[3]  D. Lambert,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2003 .

[4]  H. Meersman,et al.  Economic Impact of Port Activity: A Disaggregate Analysis - The Case of Antwerp , 2007 .

[5]  P. Panayides,et al.  Global supply chain and port/terminal: integration and competitiveness , 2008 .

[6]  Anne Goodchild,et al.  The impact of truck arrival information on container terminal rehandling , 2010 .

[7]  H. Meersman,et al.  Port competition revisited , 2010 .

[8]  Qingyu Zhang,et al.  Supply chain collaboration: conceptualisation and instrument development , 2010 .

[9]  Jrgen W. Bse Handbook of Terminal Planning , 2011 .

[10]  M. Savona,et al.  What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers , 2012 .

[11]  Shi Xiao-fa,et al.  Research on Freight Truck Operation Characteristics Based on GPS Data , 2013 .

[12]  P. Panayides,et al.  Maritime logistics as an emerging discipline , 2013 .

[13]  S. Pettit,et al.  An assessment of the integration of seaports into supply chains using a structural equation model , 2013 .

[14]  Qingcheng Zeng,et al.  Optimization Model for Truck Appointment in Container Terminals , 2013 .

[15]  Dominique Feillet,et al.  Benefits of a truck appointment system on the service quality of inland transport modes at a multimodal container terminal , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Daniel Delling,et al.  Customizable Point-of-Interest Queries in Road Networks , 2015, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[17]  Yingli Wang,et al.  ICT in multimodal transport and technological trends: unleashing potential for the future , 2015 .

[18]  Andrew V. Goldberg,et al.  Route Planning in Transportation Networks , 2015, Algorithm Engineering.

[19]  Kap Hwan Kim,et al.  Collaborative truck scheduling and appointments for trucking companies and container terminals , 2016 .

[20]  Thierry Vanelslander,et al.  How port community systems can contribute to port competitiveness: Developing a cost–benefit framework , 2016 .

[21]  H. Haralambides Globalization, public sector reform, and the role of ports in international supply chains , 2017 .

[22]  S. Seuring,et al.  Challenges and opportunities of digital information at the intersection of Big Data Analytics and supply chain management , 2017 .

[23]  Stefan Voß,et al.  Reducing port-related empty truck emissions : A mathematical approach for truck appointments with collaboration , 2017 .

[24]  Jürgen W. Böse,et al.  A decision support system for improved resource planning and truck routing at logistic nodes , 2017, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[25]  P. Baker,et al.  The Handbook of Logistics and Distribution Management : Understanding the Supply Chain Ed. 6 , 2017 .

[26]  B. Arem,et al.  Correction to: Communication between deep sea container terminals and hinterland stakeholders: information needs and the relevance of information exchange , 2017 .

[27]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Disruption management for truck appointment system at a container terminal: A green initiative , 2016, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[28]  B. Arem,et al.  Communication between deep sea container terminals and hinterland stakeholders: information needs and the relevance of information exchange , 2018 .

[29]  J.H.R. van Duin,et al.  Divergent effects of container port choice incentives on users' behavior , 2019 .