Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Roadside Culvert Treatments

Roadside cross-drainage culverts have been found to affect vehicle accident injury levels. As a result, highway designers have commonly used three safety treatments to protect errant motorists from striking culvert openings. These safety treatments have included: culvert extension, guardrail installation, and the application of safety grating. However, the identification of the most appropriate safety treatment for roadside culverts may be challenging; accident costs may dramatically change under different road and traffic characteristics. The purpose of this study was to estimate accident costs for a wide range of road and traffic scenarios and then define the safest treatment (i.e., treatment with lowest accident cost) for a variety of traffic, roadway, and roadside characteristics. Over 3,000 highway scenarios were modeled using the Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP). This study showed that the selection of culvert safety treatments should be flexible when considering different road and traffic characteristics. The findings demonstrated that culvert extension and grating were found to produce the lowest accident costs for all highway scenarios that were modeled, and guardrail protection was not recommended for any of the scenarios. Therefore, it is believed that the expanded adoption of culvert extension and culvert grates can improve overall highway safety.

[1]  B Campbell,et al.  METHODS OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS FOR HIGHWAY PROJECTS , 1988 .

[2]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  Guardrail Run-Out Length Design Procedures Revisited , 2006 .

[3]  C Zegeer,et al.  Cost effectiveness of countermeasures for utility pole accidents; volume 2, final report , 1983 .

[4]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  Evaluation of Safety Treatments for Roadside Culverts , 2009 .

[5]  J C Glennon ROADSIDE SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS ON FREEWAYS - A COST-EFFECTIVE PRIORITY APPROACH , 1974 .

[6]  F. Cheung National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) notes. An analysis of alcohol-related motor vehicle fatalities by ethnicity. , 1999, Annals of emergency medicine.

[7]  E R Post,et al.  COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF ROADSIDE SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS , 1975 .

[8]  T L Kohutek,et al.  SAFETY TREATMENT OF ROADSIDE CULVERTS ON LOW VOLUME ROADS , 1978 .

[9]  Angeli A. Sebastian,et al.  FATAL ACCIDENT REPORTING SYSTEM , 1981 .

[10]  C Zegeer,et al.  COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF COUNTERMEASURES FOR UTILITY POLE ACCIDENTS. APPENDIXES A-N. FINAL REPORT , 1983 .

[11]  T R Miller,et al.  The costs of highway crashes , 1991 .

[12]  William W. Hunter,et al.  ACCIDENT EFFECTS OF SIDESLOPE AND OTHER ROADSIDE FEATURES ON TWO-LANE ROADS , 1988 .

[13]  D L Sicking,et al.  ROADSIDE SAFETY ANALYSIS PROGRAM (RSAP)--ENGINEER'S MANUAL , 2003 .

[14]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Safety Grates For Cross-Drainage Culverts , 2008 .

[15]  Hayes E Ross,et al.  SAFETY TREATMENT OF ROADSIDE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES , 1982 .

[16]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  Roadside Safety Analysis Program: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Procedure , 1998 .

[17]  Thomas W Kennedy,et al.  MEDIANS OF DIVIDED HIGHWAYS--FREQUENCY AND NATURE OF VEHICLE ENCROACHMENTS , 1966 .

[18]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  Guardrail Runout Lengths Revisited , 1996 .

[19]  W F McFarland,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN CRITERIA FOR SAFER LUMINAIRE SUPPORTS , 1969 .