Linear Buckling Analysis and Comparative Study of Un-stiffened and Stiffened Composite Plate

Abstract In engineering application, the use of stiffened plates made of composite structures have increased over the last few decades due to its high efficiency in terms of high stiffness to low weight and high strength. Generally physical structure of stiffened plates are subjected to compressive in-plane loading and a continuous increase of these load results in buckling which in terms causes structural failure. The present research was done a finite element analysis of stiffened and un-stiffened plates with three different types of composite materials have been carried out with a view to predicting the buckling load by software ANSYS 14.0 APDL. Analyses have been performed to investigate the effect of fibre orientation, length to thickness ratio with same layup, aspect ratio with different layup configuration and different cut-outs shape for un-stiffened plate and the effect of height, position, number of stiffener, different types of stiffener and transverse stiffener for stiffened plate on buckling load. It is concluded from the result that [0/90/45/-45] fibre configuration yields the highest load, as the length to thickness ratio increases the load decreases, as the aspect ratio increases the critical load increases and critical load decreases in presence of cut-outs. It has also been observed that by increasing the number of stiffener on the stiffened plate, buckling load goes on increasing, T shape stiffened plate sustain maximum buckling load and with single stiffener at the centre of plate by varying an height of stiffener after a certain value, it gives constant buckling load for all material.

[1]  S. Sankar,et al.  A computer program for automatic generation of stiffness and mass matrices in finite-element analysis , 1980 .

[2]  C. Guedes Soares,et al.  Compressive strength of rectangular plates under biaxial load and lateral pressure , 1996 .

[3]  M. Abdalla,et al.  Buckling Analysis of Grid-Stiffened Composite Shells , 2016 .

[4]  Alan Needleman,et al.  Buckling of eccentrically stiffened elastic-plastic panels on two simple supports or multiply supported , 1975 .

[5]  D. A. Danielson,et al.  Buckling of stiffened plates under axial compression and lateral pressure , 1993 .

[6]  K. D. Kim,et al.  Buckling behaviour of composite panels using the finite element method , 1996 .

[7]  O. F. Hughes,et al.  Improved prediction of simultaneous local and overall buckling of stiffened panels , 2004 .

[8]  Rami Haj-Ali,et al.  Effect of material nonlinearity on buckling and postbuckling of fiber composite laminated plates and cylindrical shells , 1995 .

[10]  Qingkui Wang,et al.  Computational study of strengthening effects of stiffeners on regular and arbitrarily stiffened plates , 2012 .

[11]  Yan-Lin Guo,et al.  Analysis of elastic-plastic interaction buckling of stiffened panels by spline finite strip method , 1993 .

[12]  Aly S. Nazmy,et al.  Effect of aspect ratio on the elastic buckling of uniaxially loaded plates with eccentric holes , 2001 .

[13]  B. Gangadhara Prusty,et al.  Experimental and theoretical investigations on stiffened and unstiffened composite panels under uniform transverse loading , 2004 .

[14]  J. C. Robert,et al.  Finite element modeling of stiffened and unstiffened orthotropic plates , 1997 .

[15]  Ulrike Kuhlmann,et al.  Shear resistance of longitudinally stiffened panels—Part 1: Tests and numerical analysis of imperfections , 2007 .