Instrumenting complex exoskeletons for improved human-robot interaction

Gone is the era where robots were strictly used for industrial automation, working in a single, isolated welding cell from an assembly line, away from their human overlords and relegated to repetitive brainless preprogrammed tasks. Modern robotics in contrast, is rapidly evolving in a more inclusive way for the robots, bringing them closer to us humans, and opening in the process a huge and diverse spectrum of applications. We have developed a generic, low level control (LLC) real-time system for the sensor data acquisition and control of complex robots together with the development of versatile electronic hardware modules. In this article, we explain existing exoskeletons, propose generic solutions to challenges considered for safe physical human-robot interaction, and describe the instrumentation and integration of our real-time system and electronic hardware modules that we developed and successfully deployed in three exoskeleton systems.

[1]  Yves G. Losier,et al.  A Bus-Based Smart Myoelectric Electrode/Amplifier—System Requirements , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[2]  R. Riener,et al.  Towards more effective robotic gait training for stroke rehabilitation: a review , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[3]  Cihan Öztürk,et al.  A Modular Real-Time Fieldbus Architecture for Mobile Robotic Platforms , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[4]  B. Hall,et al.  FlexRay in aerospace and safety-sensitive systems , 2008, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[5]  Kazuo Kiguchi,et al.  Mechanical designs of active upper-limb exoskeleton robots: State-of-the-art and design difficulties , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[6]  F. Leens,et al.  An introduction to I2C and SPI protocols , 2009, IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine.

[7]  Hugh Herr,et al.  Exoskeletons and orthoses: classification, design challenges and future directions , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[8]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Requirements for Safe Robots: Measurements, Analysis and New Insights , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[9]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  MACCEPA, the mechanically adjustable compliance and controllable equilibrium position actuator: Design and implementation in a biped robot , 2007, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[10]  Yeqiong Song,et al.  Trends in Automotive Communication Systems , 2005, Proc. IEEE.

[11]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Variable impedance actuators: A review , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..