Studying crash avoidance maneuvers prior to an impact considering different types of driver’s distractions

Abstract Performing maneuvers such as braking and lane changing can hinder the occurrence of a crash. The driver tends to escape from the crash occurrence or reduce its severity by doing the maneuver, so finding the factors affecting this type of maneuver can help the driver to react better. This work aims to discover the effect of distraction-related factors on the performance of a crash avoidance maneuver. In order to pave the way for a more thorough comprehension of this matter, variables related to the characteristics of the driver, road, crash, vehicle, and environmental properties are also considered in the analysis. The used data is based on General Estimate System 2010 dataset, a dataset related to crashes which have occurred in the USA in 2010, to develop a Mixed Logit Model for crashes. Also, performing a maneuver is modeled by using a binary dependent variable. Then, the significant variables are found, and factors affecting driver reaction are analyzed. Afterwards, the pseudo-elasticity is measured, which demonstrates the effect of each variable in performing the maneuver. The results show the effect of each category (characteristics of driver, vehicle, crash, road, and the environmental properties) on performing a maneuver. For instance, when there is more than one car engaged in a crash, the probability of performing a maneuver reduces. Also, it is more probable that younger drivers perform a maneuver before the impact; however, older drivers do not usually conduct any maneuver. Additionally, using older vehicles, driving during weekends and on the road with curvature, on two-way paths, and on multi-lane paths can increase the probability of performing a maneuver. Among distraction-related factors, the result shows that cognitive distraction, in-vehicle activities, outside events, and using cellphone have significant negative effects on performing a maneuver. The results of pseudo-analysis show that using cellphones diminish the probability of conducting a maneuver by 66.4 %. Also, lack of consciousness and fatigue have the most negative impact on conducting a maneuver.

[1]  Marco Dozza,et al.  How does glance behavior influence crash and injury risk? A ‘what-if’ counterfactual simulation using crashes and near-crashes from SHRP2 , 2015 .

[2]  Mohammad Kermanshah,et al.  A Nested Logit analysis of the influence of distraction on types of vehicle crashes , 2018 .

[3]  Linjun Lu,et al.  Correlation between crash avoidance maneuvers and injury severity sustained by motorcyclists in single-vehicle crashes , 2016, Traffic injury prevention.

[4]  Rajesh Paleti,et al.  MODELING MULTIPLE VEHICLE OCCUPANT INJURY SEVERITY: A COPULA-BASED MULTIVARIATE APPROACH , 2009 .

[5]  Carlo Giacomo Prato,et al.  Observed and unobserved correlation between crash avoidance manoeuvers and crash severity , 2016, International journal of injury control and safety promotion.

[6]  Amir Sobhani,et al.  A binary logistic regression model of the driver avoidance manoeuvers in two passenger vehicle crashes , 2016 .

[7]  Faming Liang,et al.  Crash Injury Severity Analysis Using a Bayesian Ordered Probit Model , 2007 .

[8]  Xuedong Yan,et al.  Exploring precrash maneuvers using classification trees and random forests. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. , 2003 .

[10]  R. Brant Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. , 1990, Biometrics.

[11]  Hesamoddin Razi-Ardakani,et al.  Study on mobile phone use while driving in a sample of Iranian drivers , 2017, International journal of injury control and safety promotion.

[12]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  The effect of distractions on the crash types of teenage drivers. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Xuedong Yan,et al.  Analyses of Factors of Crash Avoidance Maneuvers Using the General Estimates System , 2008, Traffic injury prevention.

[14]  Naveen Eluru,et al.  A joint econometric analysis of seat belt use and crash-related injury severity. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Carlo Giacomo Prato,et al.  Associating Crash Avoidance Maneuvers With Driver Attributes and Accident Characteristics: A Mixed Logit Model Approach , 2012, Traffic injury prevention.

[16]  Marco Dozza,et al.  What factors influence drivers' response time for evasive maneuvers in real traffic? , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.