Do competitively acquired funds induce universities to increase productivity

Abstract This paper analyzes the impact of private and public third-party funds on the productivity of Swiss university departments and public research institutions. Estimating a production function assuming that labor inputs produce master students and scientific publications reveals a positive effect of public third-party funding on productivity but not for private funds. However, once we include technology transfer as an additional output, the coefficient for public third-party funding turns insignificant while private funding becomes significant, indicating that the disciplining effect of public donors focuses on publications while private donors foster technology transfer. We employ three alternative approaches to tackle endogeneity and find qualitatively robust results.

[1]  Jenn-Shyong Kuo,et al.  The cost efficiency impact of the university operation fund on public universities in Taiwan , 2008 .

[2]  Yaw M. Mensah,et al.  Cost efficiency and financial flexibility in institutions of higher education , 2003 .

[3]  L. Butler,et al.  Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts , 2003 .

[4]  Jussi Kivistö The government‐higher education institution relationship: Theoretical considerations from the perspective of agency theory , 2005 .

[5]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Towards Evidence-based Reform of European Universities , 2008 .

[6]  Richard Florida,et al.  Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States , 1999 .

[7]  D. Jansen,et al.  New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations : Disciplinary Approaches, Interfaces and Integration , 2007 .

[8]  Tommaso Agasisti,et al.  Market forces and competition in university systems: theoretical reflections and empirical evidence from Italy , 2009 .

[9]  Torben Schubert,et al.  Empirical observations on New Public Management to increase efficiency in public research--Boon or bane? , 2009 .

[10]  Aldo Geuna,et al.  The Changing Rationale for European University Research Funding: Are There Negative Unintended Consequences? , 2001 .

[11]  W. Niskanen Bureaucrats and Politicians , 1975, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[12]  Sergio Perelman,et al.  Technical efficiency of European railways: a distance function approach , 2000 .

[13]  M. Woerter,et al.  University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: What university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises , 2008 .

[14]  Liudvika Leisytë,et al.  New Public Management in Lithuania's Higher Education , 2006 .

[15]  What Do Schools Produce? Implications of Multiple Outputs in Education , 2000 .

[16]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Advanced indicators of productivity of universitiesAn application of robust nonparametric methods to Italian data , 2006, Scientometrics.

[17]  M. Abbott,et al.  Competition and efficiency: overseas students and technical efficiency in Australian and New Zealand universities , 2009 .

[18]  Inés Macho-Stadler,et al.  Commercial Incentives in Academia , 2008 .

[19]  Spyros Arvanitis,et al.  The Impact of Spillovers and Knowledge Heterogeneity on Firm Performance: Evidence from Swiss Manufacturing , 2002 .

[20]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Academic Freedom, Private-Sector Focus, and the Process of Innovation , 2005 .

[21]  John Robst,et al.  Cost Efficiency in Public Higher Education Institutions , 2001 .

[22]  H. Boer,et al.  On the Way towards New Public Management? The Governance of University Systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany , 2007 .

[23]  Nian Cai Liu,et al.  The Academic Ranking of World Universities. , 2005 .

[24]  G. Kempkes,et al.  The efficiency of German universities–some evidence from nonparametric and parametric methods , 2010 .

[25]  Richard Florida,et al.  Engine or Infrastructure? The University Role in Economic Development , 1999 .

[26]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  The Governance and Performance of Research Universities: Evidence from Europe and the U.S , 2009 .

[27]  Benedetto Lepori,et al.  Cost Structure, Economies of Capacity Utilization and Scope in Swiss Higher Education Institutions , 2007 .

[28]  Dorothea Jansen,et al.  Drittmittel als Performanzindikator der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung , 2007 .

[29]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  Sustainability of incentives for excellent research — The German case , 2009, Scientometrics.

[30]  Cinzia Daraio,et al.  Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation , 2007 .

[31]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Higher Aspirations: An Agenda for Reforming European Universities. Bruegel Blueprint Series, Volume 5, July 2008 , 2008 .

[32]  J. Angrist,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 15, Number 4—Fall 2001—Pages 69–85 Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments , 2022 .

[33]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  On the econometric estimation of the distance function representation of a production technology , 2000 .

[34]  M. Woerter,et al.  Knowledge and Technology Transfer (Ktt) Activities between Universities and Firms in Switzerland: The Main Facts - an Empirical Analysis Based on Firm-Level Data , 2005 .

[35]  Alfred Kleinknecht,et al.  Innovation and Firm Performance. Econometric Explorations of Survey Data , 2002 .

[36]  Ingo Liefner,et al.  Higher education funding reform and university–industry links in developing countries: The case of Thailand , 2007 .

[37]  P. Vanden Abeele,et al.  On research efficiency: A micro-analysis of Dutch university research in Economics and Business Management , 2005 .

[38]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  Individual and collective determinants of academic scientists' productivity , 2006, Inf. Econ. Policy.