The limitations of dispositional resistance in relation to organizational change

Purpose – The purpose of this research is to test the moderating role of dispositional resistance in achieving sustainable organisational change.Design/methodology/approach – Four studies were conducted in the period 2005‐2007. Each study included the participation of individuals experiencing ongoing organisational changes at the time, and was repeated with an independent sample in order to strengthen the meaning of the findings.Findings – The studies confirmed the assumed positive relationship between benefit of change and commitment to change. Furthermore, two studies confirmed the assumed negative relationship between extent of change and commitment to change, while the other two studies, in contrast to the hypothesis presented, found a positive relationship. Despite the assumptions, with the exception of one study it was not possible to show moderating effects of resistance to change.Research limitations/implications – The study casts doubt about resistance to change defined as a disposition and its s...

[1]  Wendy E. A. Ruona,et al.  Individual Readiness for Organizational Change and Its Implications for Human Resource and Organization Development , 2011 .

[2]  Shaul Oreg,et al.  Ambivalence toward imposed change: the conflict between dispositional resistance to change and the orientation toward the change agent. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  Moshe Farjoun.  Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change As a Duality , 2010 .

[4]  Alexandra Michel,et al.  I Scratch Your Back – You Scratch Mine. Do Procedural Justice and Organizational Identification Matter for Employees' Cooperation During Change? , 2010 .

[5]  Jeffrey D. Ford,et al.  Stop Blaming Resistance to Change and Start Using It , 2010 .

[6]  Jixia Yang,et al.  The relations of daily counterproductive workplace behavior with emotions, situational antecedents, and personality moderators: A diary study in Hong Kong. , 2009 .

[7]  Hilde Hetland,et al.  Exploring Dispositional Resistance to Change , 2009 .

[8]  A. Michel,et al.  Ausgebrannt und unzufrieden , 2009 .

[9]  Shaul Oreg,et al.  Dispositional Resistance to Change and Occupational Interests and Choices , 2009 .

[10]  Luis M. Arciniega,et al.  Dispositional resistance to change: measurement equivalence and the link to personal values across 17 nations. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  F. Bond,et al.  The influence of psychological flexibility on work redesign: mediated moderation of a work reorganization intervention. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  B. Schyns,et al.  Daily work contexts and resistance to organisational change : the role of leader-member exchange, development climate, and change process characteristics. , 2008 .

[13]  P. Klarner,et al.  Getting Organizational Change Right in Public Services: The Case of European Higher Education , 2008 .

[14]  Steven D. Caldwell,et al.  The effects of transformational and change leadership on employees' commitment to a change: a multilevel study. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Steven D. Caldwell,et al.  Beyond change management: a multilevel investigation of contextual and personal influences on employees' commitment to change. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Employee commitment and support for an organizational change: Test of the three-component model in two cultures , 2007 .

[17]  Thomas Diefenbach,et al.  The managerialistic ideology of organisational change management , 2007 .

[18]  Donald B. Fedor,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES ON EMPLOYEE COMMITMENT: A MULTILEVEL INVESTIGATION , 2006 .

[19]  S. Oreg.  Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change , 2006 .

[20]  Mark A Griffin,et al.  Perceptions of organizational change: a stress and coping perspective. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  R. By.  Organisational change management: A critical review , 2005 .

[22]  D. Buchanan,et al.  No Going Back: A Review of the Literature on Sustaining Organizational Change , 2005 .

[23]  Bernard Burnes,et al.  Managing Change , 2004 .

[24]  Steven D. Caldwell,et al.  Toward an understanding of the relationships among organizational change, individual differences, and changes in person-environment fit: a cross-level study. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  B. Burnes.  Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal , 2004 .

[26]  T. Judge,et al.  Affect and job satisfaction: a study of their relationship at work and at home. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  Markus Wirtz,et al.  Über das Problem fehlender Werte: Wie der Einfluss fehlender Informationen auf Analyseergebnisse entdeckt und reduziert werden kann , 2004 .

[28]  O. Mittag,et al.  [Assessing the work-role quality and its significance in predicting return to work]. , 2004, Die Rehabilitation.

[29]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  Raymond Caldwell.  Models of Change Agency: A Fourfold Classification , 2003 .

[31]  B. Burnes.  Managing change and changing managers from ABC to XYZ , 2003 .

[32]  Shaul Oreg,et al.  Resistance to change: developing an individual differences measure. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  M. P. D. Val,et al.  Resistance to change: a literature review and empirical study , 2003 .

[34]  Peter Y. Chen,et al.  Using Social Exchange Theory to Distinguish Procedural from Interactional Justice , 2002 .

[35]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment to organizational change: extension of a three-component model. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[36]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  Obstacles to effective organizational change: the underlying reasons , 2002 .

[37]  R. A. Reisner.  When a Turnaround STALLS , 2002 .

[38]  S. Piderit.  Rethinking Resistance and Recognizing Ambivalence: A Multidimensional View of Attitudes Toward an Organizational Change , 2000 .

[39]  N. Nohria,et al.  Breaking the Code of Change , 2000 .

[40]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Why negative affectivity should not be controlled in job stress research: don't throw out the baby with the bath water , 2000, Journal of Organizational Behavior.

[41]  Connie R. Wanberg,et al.  Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  Eric B. Dent,et al.  Challenging “Resistance to Change” , 1999 .

[43]  K. Lewin,et al.  Group decision and social change. , 1999 .

[44]  Steven H. Appelbaum,et al.  Transformational and adaptive learning within the learning organization: a framework for research and application , 1997 .

[45]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Cultural Values on Employee Resistance to Teams: Toward A Model of Globalized Self-Managing Work Team Effectiveness , 1997 .

[46]  E. Schein.  Kurt Lewin's change theory in the field and in the classroom: Notes toward a model of managed learning , 1996 .

[47]  R. Rumelt,et al.  Inertia and Transformation , 1995 .

[48]  D. Stace,et al.  Beyond the Boundaries: Leading and RE-Creating the Successful Enterprise , 1994 .

[49]  D. Coghlan.  A Person‐centred Approach to Dealing with Resistance to Change , 1993 .

[50]  Martin Gold,et al.  Introduction: The Heritage of Kurt Lewin , 1992 .

[51]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[52]  I. Rock,et al.  The legacy of Gestalt psychology. , 1990, Scientific American.

[53]  B Burnes,et al.  AMT: A Strategy for Success? , 1989 .

[54]  Susan J. Ashford,et al.  Individual Strategies for Coping with Stress during Organizational Transitions , 1988 .

[55]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[56]  M. Diamond,et al.  RESISTANCE TO CHANGE: A PSYCHOANALYTIC CRITIQUE OF ARGYRIS AND SCHON'S CONTRIBUTIONS TO ORGANIZATION THEORY AND INTERVENTION , 1986 .

[57]  M. Evans.  A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis , 1985 .

[58]  S. Davis,et al.  Matching corporate culture and business strategy , 1981 .

[59]  J. Kotter,et al.  Choosing strategies for change. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[60]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[61]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[62]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[63]  K. Lewin,et al.  Resolving Social Conflicts , 1948 .

[64]  Kurt Lewin,et al.  Field theory and learning. , 1942 .