Putting local features on a manifold

Local features have proven very useful for recognition. Manifold learning has proven to be a very powerful tool in data analysis. However, manifold learning application for images are mainly based on holistic vectorized representations of images. The challenging question that we address in this paper is how can we learn image manifolds from a punch of local features in a smooth way that captures the feature similarity and spatial arrangement variability between images. We introduce a novel framework for learning a manifold representation from collections of local features in images. We first show how we can learn a feature embedding representation that preserves both the local appearance similarity as well as the spatial structure of the features. We also show how we can embed features from a new image by introducing a solution for the out-of-sample that is suitable for this context. By solving these two problems and defining a proper distance measure in the feature embedding space, we can reach an image manifold embedding space.

[1]  Alexei A. Efros,et al.  Discovering objects and their location in images , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[2]  Ahmed M. Elgammal,et al.  One-shot multi-set non-rigid feature-spatial matching , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[3]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  A Performance Evaluation of Local Descriptors , 2005, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  Zhaozhong Wang,et al.  Dimension-free affine shape matching through subspace invariance , 2009, CVPR.

[5]  Hiroshi Murase,et al.  Learning and recognition of 3D objects from appearance , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Qualitative Vision.

[6]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Unsupervised Learning of Categories from Sets of Partially Matching Image Features , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[7]  Gang Wang,et al.  Using Dependent Regions for Object Categorization in a Generative Framework , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[8]  A. Elgammal,et al.  Inferring 3D body pose from silhouettes using activity manifold learning , 2004, CVPR 2004.

[9]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Shape Matching and Object Recognition , 2006, Toward Category-Level Object Recognition.

[10]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[11]  Frédéric Jurie,et al.  Groups of Adjacent Contour Segments for Object Detection , 2008, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Object class recognition by unsupervised scale-invariant learning , 2003, 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings..

[13]  Mikhail Belkin,et al.  Laplacian Eigenmaps for Dimensionality Reduction and Data Representation , 2003, Neural Computation.

[14]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Learning Generative Visual Models from Few Training Examples: An Incremental Bayesian Approach Tested on 101 Object Categories , 2004, 2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop.

[15]  Feiping Nie,et al.  Embedding new data points for manifold learning via coordinate propagation , 2007, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[16]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Combining generative models and Fisher kernels for object recognition , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[17]  H. C. Longuet-Higgins,et al.  An algorithm for associating the features of two images , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  Nicolas Le Roux,et al.  Out-of-Sample Extensions for LLE, Isomap, MDS, Eigenmaps, and Spectral Clustering , 2003, NIPS.

[19]  S T Roweis,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. , 2000, Science.

[20]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Unsupervised modeling of object categories using link analysis techniques , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[21]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[22]  Bernt Schiele,et al.  How Good are Local Features for Classes of Geometric Objects , 2007, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[23]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  The pyramid match kernel: discriminative classification with sets of image features , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.