Strategic Mitigation of Agent Inattention in Drivers with Open-Quantum Cognition Models

State-of-the-art driver-assist systems have failed to effectively mitigate driver inattention and had minimal impacts on the ever-growing number of road mishaps (e.g. life loss, physical injuries due to accidents caused by various factors that lead to driver inattention). This is because traditional humanmachine interaction settings are modeled in classical and behavioral game-theoretic domains which are technically appropriate to characterize strategic interaction between either two utility maximizing agents, or human decision makers. Therefore, in an attempt to improve the persuasive effectiveness of driverassist systems, we develop a novel strategic and personalized driver-assist system which adapts to the driver’s mental state and choice behavior. First, we propose a novel equilibrium notion in human-system interaction games, where the system maximizes its expected utility and human decisions can be characterized using any general decision model. Then we use this novel equilibrium notion to investigate the strategic driver-vehicle interaction game where the car presents a persuasive recommendation to steer the driver towards safer driving decisions. We assume that the driver employs an open-quantum system cognition model, which captures complex aspects of human decision making such as violations to classical law of total probability and incompatibility of certain mental representations of information. We present closed-form expressions for players’ final responses to each other’s strategies so that we can numerically compute both pure and mixed equilibria. Numerical results are presented to illustrate both kinds of equilibria.

[1]  Yong Gu Ji,et al.  Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[3]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[4]  S. Daniel,et al.  National Highway Traffic Safety Administration , 2020, Federal Regulatory Guide.

[5]  B. Monin,et al.  Potential Moral Stigma and Reactions to Sexually Transmitted Diseases: Evidence for a Disjunction Fallacy , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[6]  J. Yellott The relationship between Luce's Choice Axiom, Thurstone's Theory of Comparative Judgment, and the double exponential distribution , 1977 .

[7]  Sören Hohmann,et al.  Cooperative Shared Control Driver Assistance Systems Based on Motion Primitives and Differential Games , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[8]  Morimichi Nishigaki,et al.  Driver attention level estimation using driver model identification , 2019, 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC).

[9]  John Richardson,et al.  Alarm timing, trust and driver expectation for forward collision warning systems. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  Martin Baumann,et al.  A Methodical Approach to Examine Conflicts in Context of Driver - Autonomous Vehicle - Interaction , 2019 .

[11]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[12]  Malte Risto,et al.  The social behavior of autonomous vehicles , 2016, UbiComp Adjunct.

[13]  Bernhard H. Haak,et al.  Open Quantum Systems , 2019, Tutorials, Schools, and Workshops in the Mathematical Sciences.

[14]  Philip Koopman,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Safety: An Interdisciplinary Challenge , 2017, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[15]  Emmanuel Haven,et al.  Quantum mechanics and violations of the sure-thing principle: The use of probability interference and other concepts , 2009 .

[16]  R. Luce,et al.  The Choice Axiom after Twenty Years , 1977 .

[17]  Riccardo Franco,et al.  The conjunction fallacy and interference effects , 2007, 0708.3948.

[18]  David J. Cole,et al.  Game-Theoretic Modeling of the Steering Interaction Between a Human Driver and a Vehicle Collision Avoidance Controller , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[19]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[20]  Ismael Martínez-Martínez,et al.  Quantum stochastic walks on networks for decision-making , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[21]  Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles , 2022 .

[22]  Stewart Worrall,et al.  Long short term memory for driver intent prediction , 2017, 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).