Statistical model for degraded DNA samples and adjusted probabilities for allelic drop-out.

DNA samples found at a scene of crime or obtained from the debris of a mass disaster accident are often subject to degradation. When using the STR DNA technology, the DNA profile is observed via a so-called electropherogram (EPG), where the alleles are identified as signal peaks above a certain level or above a signal to noise threshold. Degradation implies that these peak intensities decrease in strength for longer short tandem repeat (STR) sequences. Consequently, long STR loci may fail to produce peak heights above the limit of detection resulting in allelic or locus drop-outs. In this paper, we present a method for measuring the degree of degradation of a sample and demonstrate how to incorporate this in estimating the probability of allelic drop-out. This is done by extending an existing method derived for non-degraded samples. The performance of the methodology is evaluated using data from degraded DNA, where cases with varying amounts of DNA and levels of degradation are investigated.

[1]  T. Parsons,et al.  Application of Low Copy Number STR Typing to the Identification of Aged, Degraded Skeletal Remains * , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  R. Fourney,et al.  Sensitive and specific quantification of human genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in forensic science specimens: casework examples. , 1991, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  Benjamin E. Krenke,et al.  Developmental validation of a real-time PCR assay for the simultaneous quantification of total human and male DNA. , 2008, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[4]  L. Hennessy,et al.  Developmental validation of the quantifiler real-time PCR kits for the quantification of human nuclear DNA samples. , 2005, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  Niels Morling,et al.  Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics. , 2009, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[6]  J. Buckleton,et al.  Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation , 2004 .

[7]  T. Tvedebrink,et al.  Evaluating the weight of evidence by using quantitative short tandem repeat data in DNA mixtures , 2010 .

[8]  W R Mayr,et al.  DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): recommendations regarding the role of forensic genetics for disaster victim identification (DVI). , 2007, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[9]  A. Alonso,et al.  Challenges of DNA profiling in mass disaster investigations. , 2005, Croatian medical journal.

[10]  J. Bonnet,et al.  Simultaneous assessment of average fragment size and amount in minute samples of degraded DNA. , 2009, Analytical biochemistry.

[11]  W Parson,et al.  Analysis of artificially degraded DNA using STRs and SNPs--results of a collaborative European (EDNAP) exercise. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[12]  Jo-Anne Bright,et al.  Examination of the variability in mixed DNA profile parameters for the Identifiler multiplex. , 2010, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[13]  P. Schneider,et al.  Preparation of degraded human DNA under controlled conditions. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[14]  P. Gill,et al.  STR analysis of artificially degraded DNA-results of a collaborative European exercise. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[15]  Ali Abbas,et al.  Forensic implications of genetic analyses from degraded DNA--a review. , 2010, Forensic science international. Genetics.