Field strength dependence of MRI contrast enhancement: phantom measurements and application to dynamic breast imaging.

Differences in MRI-measured contrast enhancement have been used for tissue characterization, particularly for the characterization of mammary tumours. T1 weighted spoiled gradient echo sequences have usually been acquired for this purpose and relative signal intensity increase (Srel) has been determined to quantify contrast uptake. The field strength dependence of this technique is evaluated in this paper by phantom measurements. Srel is compared with the recently introduced "enhancement factor" (EF) and "contrast uptake equivalent" (CE) as a quantitative assessment parameter for contrast uptake. Enhancing tissues were simulated with water phantoms doped with increasing concentrations of Gd-DTPA. Spoiled gradients echo images (FLASH-2D) were obtained on a 0.2 T and 1.5 T MR system. Srel, EF and CE were determined and the results of the phantom measurements were applied to typical types of breast tissues. Srel showed a strong dependence on the magnetic field strength and was greater at higher field strengths. This is because Srel correlates positively with the native T1 which is longer at higher field strengths. Conversely, the EF and CE almost eliminated the distorting influences of the magnetic field strength. CE provided a good approximation of the actual contrast uptake. In practice, the dependence of Srel on the magnetic field strength might cause malignant lesions to be misclassified as benign at low field strengths. Either Srel criteria should be adjusted to magnetic field strength or EF and CE should be used instead of Srel for tissue characterization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

[1]  K J Wolf,et al.  Rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of hypervascular and fibrous pannus with dynamic MR imaging enhanced with Gd-DTPA. , 1990, Radiology.

[2]  T. Hilbertz,et al.  Administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine in MR imaging of intracranial tumors: dosage and field strength. , 1992, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  S. H. Koenig,et al.  Magnetic field dependence of solvent proton relaxation rates induced by Gd3+ and Mn2+ complexes of various polyaza macrocyclic ligands: Implications for NMR imaging , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  I. Isherwood,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the mini-pig heart: the effect of gadolinium-DTPA on normal myocardium. , 1988, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  T. Foster,et al.  A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1-100 MHz: dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. , 1984, Medical physics.

[6]  W. Kaiser,et al.  MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. , 1989, Radiology.

[7]  M Recht,et al.  Method for the quantitative assessment of contrast agent uptake in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  C. Hardy,et al.  A review of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in pathology: are T1 and T2 diagnostic? , 1987, Medical physics.

[9]  R. Slutsky,et al.  Tissue distribution and magnetic resonance spin lattice relaxation effects of gadolinium-DTPA. , 1985, Radiology.