Evaluation of rate law approximations in bottom-up kinetic models of metabolism

BackgroundThe mechanistic description of enzyme kinetics in a dynamic model of metabolism requires specifying the numerical values of a large number of kinetic parameters. The parameterization challenge is often addressed through the use of simplifying approximations to form reaction rate laws with reduced numbers of parameters. Whether such simplified models can reproduce dynamic characteristics of the full system is an important question.ResultsIn this work, we compared the local transient response properties of dynamic models constructed using rate laws with varying levels of approximation. These approximate rate laws were: 1) a Michaelis-Menten rate law with measured enzyme parameters, 2) a Michaelis-Menten rate law with approximated parameters, using the convenience kinetics convention, 3) a thermodynamic rate law resulting from a metabolite saturation assumption, and 4) a pure chemical reaction mass action rate law that removes the role of the enzyme from the reaction kinetics. We utilized in vivo data for the human red blood cell to compare the effect of rate law choices against the backdrop of physiological flux and concentration differences. We found that the Michaelis-Menten rate law with measured enzyme parameters yields an excellent approximation of the full system dynamics, while other assumptions cause greater discrepancies in system dynamic behavior. However, iteratively replacing mechanistic rate laws with approximations resulted in a model that retains a high correlation with the true model behavior. Investigating this consistency, we determined that the order of magnitude differences among fluxes and concentrations in the network were greatly influential on the network dynamics. We further identified reaction features such as thermodynamic reversibility, high substrate concentration, and lack of allosteric regulation, which make certain reactions more suitable for rate law approximations.ConclusionsOverall, our work generally supports the use of approximate rate laws when building large scale kinetic models, due to the key role that physiologically meaningful flux and concentration ranges play in determining network dynamics. However, we also showed that detailed mechanistic models show a clear benefit in prediction accuracy when data is available. The work here should help to provide guidance to future kinetic modeling efforts on the choice of rate law and parameterization approaches.

[1]  D. Fell Metabolic control analysis: a survey of its theoretical and experimental development. , 1992, The Biochemical journal.

[2]  Judith B. Zaugg,et al.  Bacterial adaptation through distributed sensing of metabolic fluxes , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[3]  Neema Jamshidi,et al.  Mass action stoichiometric simulation models: incorporating kinetics and regulation into stoichiometric models. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[4]  Bernhard O. Palsson,et al.  On the dynamics of the irreversible Michaelis-Menten reaction mechanism , 1987 .

[5]  B. Palsson,et al.  Metabolic dynamics in the human red cell. Part I--A comprehensive kinetic model. , 1989, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  Matthias Reuss,et al.  Optimal re-design of primary metabolism in Escherichia coli using linlog kinetics. , 2004, Metabolic engineering.

[7]  J. Heijnen,et al.  Dynamic simulation and metabolic re-design of a branched pathway using linlog kinetics. , 2003, Metabolic engineering.

[8]  Ron Milo,et al.  eQuilibrator—the biochemical thermodynamics calculator , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[9]  Neema Jamshidi,et al.  In silico model-driven assessment of the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on human red blood cell metabolism. , 2002, Genome research.

[10]  Barbara M. Bakker,et al.  How yeast cells synchronize their glycolytic oscillations: a perturbation analytic treatment. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[11]  R. Milo,et al.  A note on the kinetics of enzyme action: A decomposition that highlights thermodynamic effects , 2013, FEBS letters.

[12]  L. Segel,et al.  On the validity of the steady state assumption of enzyme kinetics. , 1988, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[13]  Andreas Zell,et al.  Modeling metabolic networks in C . glutamicum : a comparison of rate laws in combination with various parameter optimization strategies , 2009 .

[14]  Dietrich Rebholz-Schuhmann,et al.  Facilitating the development of controlled vocabularies for metabolomics technologies with text mining , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[15]  S. Schnell,et al.  Modelling reaction kinetics inside cells. , 2008, Essays in biochemistry.

[16]  G. Briggs,et al.  A Note on the Kinetics of Enzyme Action. , 1925, The Biochemical journal.

[17]  Daniel C. Zielinski,et al.  Personalized Whole-Cell Kinetic Models of Metabolism for Discovery in Genomics and Pharmacodynamics. , 2015, Cell systems.

[18]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Controllability of complex networks , 2011, Nature.

[19]  Ronan M. T. Fleming,et al.  Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0 , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[20]  Holger Fröhlich,et al.  Modeling ERBB receptor-regulated G1/S transition to find novel targets for de novo trastuzumab resistance , 2009, BMC Systems Biology.

[21]  Neema Jamshidi,et al.  Systems biology of SNPs , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[22]  M. Salter,et al.  Metabolic control. , 1994, Essays in biochemistry.

[23]  Nicola Zamboni,et al.  anNET: a tool for network-embedded thermodynamic analysis of quantitative metabolome data , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[24]  Neil Swainston,et al.  Towards a genome-scale kinetic model of cellular metabolism , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[25]  Masaru Tomita,et al.  Roles of Hemoglobin Allostery in Hypoxia-induced Metabolic Alterations in Erythrocytes , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  J. Rabinowitz,et al.  Absolute Metabolite Concentrations and Implied Enzyme Active Site Occupancy in Escherichia coli , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[27]  Kevin R. Sanft,et al.  Legitimacy of the stochastic Michaelis-Menten approximation. , 2011, IET systems biology.

[28]  Jan Schellenberger,et al.  Use of Randomized Sampling for Analysis of Metabolic Networks* , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  J. Heijnen,et al.  An in vivo data-driven framework for classification and quantification of enzyme kinetics and determination of apparent thermodynamic data. , 2011, Metabolic engineering.

[30]  Marija Cvijovic,et al.  Kinetic models in industrial biotechnology - Improving cell factory performance. , 2014, Metabolic engineering.

[31]  Santiago Schnell,et al.  Validity of the Michaelis–Menten equation – steady‐state or reactant stationary assumption: that is the question , 2014, The FEBS journal.

[32]  Wolfgang Wiechert,et al.  Translating biochemical network models between different kinetic formats. , 2009, Metabolic engineering.

[33]  Antje Chang,et al.  BRENDA, the enzyme information system in 2011 , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[34]  E. Klipp,et al.  Bringing metabolic networks to life: convenience rate law and thermodynamic constraints , 2006, Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.

[35]  B O Palsson,et al.  Mathematical modelling of dynamics and control in metabolic networks. I. On Michaelis-Menten kinetics. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  P W Kuchel,et al.  Model of 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate metabolism in the human erythrocyte based on detailed enzyme kinetic equations: equations and parameter refinement. , 1999, The Biochemical journal.

[37]  Masaru Tomita,et al.  E-Cell 2: Multi-platform E-Cell simulation system , 2003, Bioinform..

[38]  A. Tzafriri,et al.  Michaelis-Menten kinetics at high enzyme concentrations , 2003, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[39]  Ronan M. T. Fleming,et al.  Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0 , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[40]  Jonathan R. Karr,et al.  A Whole-Cell Computational Model Predicts Phenotype from Genotype , 2012, Cell.

[41]  Aarash Bordbar,et al.  Minimal metabolic pathway structure is consistent with associated biomolecular interactions , 2014, Molecular systems biology.

[42]  J. Heijnen Approximative kinetic formats used in metabolic network modeling , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[43]  C. Chassagnole,et al.  Dynamic modeling of the central carbon metabolism of Escherichia coli. , 2002, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[44]  L. A. Segel,et al.  The Quasi-Steady-State Assumption: A Case Study in Perturbation , 1989, SIAM Rev..