Analysis of ductile and brittle failures from creep rupture testing of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipes

A comprehensive analysis of ductile and brittle failures from creep rupture testing of a wide spectrum of HDPE pipes was conducted. The analysis indicates that the ductile failure of such pipes is primarily driven by the yield stress of the polymer (or pipe). Examination of ductile failure data at multiple temperatures indicates a systematic improvement in performance with increasing temperature. It is proposed that testing at higher (above-ambient) temperatures leads to progressive relaxation of the residual stresses in the pipe; this causes the pipe to perform better as residual stresses are known to help accelerate the fracture process. Finally, our investigation indicates no correlation, whatsoever, between brittle failures in pressurized pipes and the PENT (Pennsylvania edge-notch tensile test; ASTM F1473) failure times. Therefore, one has to be extremely cautious in interpreting the true value of the PENT test when developing polymers and pipes for high-performance pressure pipe applications.

[1]  J. Williams,et al.  The determination of residual stresses in plastic pipe and their role in fracture , 1981 .

[2]  N. Brown,et al.  Direct measurements of the strain on the boundary of crazes in polyethylene , 1988 .

[3]  J. Janzen.  Elastic moduli of semicrystalline polyethylenes compared with theoretical micromechanical models for composites , 1992 .

[4]  L. Bohm,et al.  High-density polyethylene pipe resins† , 1992 .

[5]  U. Gedde,et al.  Molecular and lamellar structure of an extrusion-grade medium-density polyethylene for gas distribution , 1994 .

[6]  J. G. Williams,et al.  Fracture Mechanics of Polymers , 1984 .

[7]  Y. Germain,et al.  Physical and mechanical properties of polyethylene for pipes in relation to molecular architecture. II. Short‐term creep of isotropic and drawn materials , 2002 .

[8]  U. Gedde,et al.  Molecular structure and morphology of crosslinked polyethylene in an aged hot‐water pipe , 1990 .

[9]  A. Hiltner,et al.  Correlation of stepwise fatigue and creep slow crack growth in high density polyethylene , 1999 .

[10]  N. Brown,et al.  A sensitive mechanical test for slow crack growth in polyethylene , 1997 .

[11]  A. Hiltner,et al.  Correlation of fatigue and creep slow crack growth in a medium density polyethylene pipe material , 2000 .

[12]  Ulf W. Gedde,et al.  Structure and crack growth in gas pipes of medium-density and high-density polyethylene , 1996 .

[13]  N. Brown,et al.  The initiation of slow crack growth in linear polyethylene under single edge notch tension and plane strain , 1985 .

[14]  A. Lustiger,et al.  AN ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUE FOR MEASURING RELATIVE TIE-MOLECULE CONCENTRATION IN POLYETHYLENE , 1991 .

[15]  N. Brown,et al.  The dependence of butyl branch density on slow crack growth in polyethylene: Kinetics , 1990 .

[16]  Jacqueline I. Kroschwitz,et al.  Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology , 1970 .

[17]  N. Brown,et al.  Discontinuous crack growth in polyethylene under a constant load , 1991, Journal of Materials Science.

[18]  C. Wang,et al.  Processing of bulk (p-phenylene benzobisthiazole)nylon-6,6 molecular composites , 1988 .

[19]  R. Markham,et al.  Importance of tie molecules in preventing polyethylene fracture under long-term loading conditions , 1983 .

[20]  N. Brown,et al.  Effect of thermal history on the initiation of slow crack growth in linear polyethylene , 1987 .

[21]  Alexander Chudnovsky,et al.  Application of the crack layer theory to modeling of slow crack growth in polyethylene , 1999 .

[22]  A. Ward,et al.  Accelerated test for evaluating slow crack growth of polyethylene copolymers in igepal and air , 1990 .

[23]  U. Gedde,et al.  Molecular fractionation in melt-crystallized polyethylene: 4. Fracture , 1985 .

[24]  N. Brown,et al.  DEPENDENCE OF SLOW CRACK GROWTH IN POLYETHYLENE ON BUTYL BRANCH DENSITY : MORPHOLOGY AND THEORY , 1991 .

[25]  L Czuba,et al.  SPE voices: How to position yourself for the new world of opportunity , 2005 .

[26]  R. H. Boyd.  Relaxation processes in crystalline polymers: experimental behaviour — a review , 1985 .

[27]  G. Vigier,et al.  Physical and mechanical properties of polyethylene for pipes in relation to molecular architecture. I. Microstructure and crystallisation kinetics , 2001 .

[28]  Graham Williams,et al.  Anelastic and Dielectric Effects in Polymeric Solids , 1991 .

[29]  N. Brown,et al.  The stress and strain fields in the neighbourhood of a notch in polyethylene , 1989 .

[30]  Garth L. Wilkes,et al.  The influence of molecular weight and thermal history on the thermal, rheological, and mechanical properties of metallocene-catalyzed linear polyethylenes , 2000 .

[31]  D. Barry,et al.  The effect of molecular structure and polymer morphology on the fracture resistance of high-density polyethylene , 1992 .

[32]  Xuqing Wang,et al.  Slow fracture in a homopolymer and copolymer of polyethylene , 1988 .

[33]  D. Barry,et al.  Static fatigue fracture of polyethylene: A morphological analysis , 1987 .

[34]  Norman Brown,et al.  The transition from ductile to slow crack growth failure in a copolymer of polyethylene , 1990 .

[35]  A. Chudnovsky,et al.  Constitutive equations of crack layer growth , 1992 .

[36]  A. Hiltner,et al.  Effect of strain rate on stepwise fatigue and creep slow crack growth in high density polyethylene , 2000 .

[37]  H. Baker,et al.  The influence of branch length on the deformation and microstructure of polyethylene , 1982 .

[38]  N. Brown,et al.  Slow crack growth in blends of HDPE and UHMWPE , 1992 .