Testing evolutionary theory of household consumption behavior in the case of novelty - a product characteristics approach

This article tests and extends the evolutionary theory of household consumption behavior, which is an alternative to neoclassical theory. Evolutionary economists offer novel approaches to the analysis of consumption behavior that emphasize the major role of learning in the evolution of consumer preferences and wants. As a possible inspiration for further progress in evolutionary thought, this paper examines the idea of consumer learning by studying the nature of what consumers should learn in the context of ‘novelty’. Our empirical results regarding novelty during the learning process show that consumers learn the ‘new characteristics’ of consumer goods, contrary to the Lancasterian approach, which suggests that the characteristics space of goods is fixed. We show that during the process of consumption, ‘consumer learning’ extends the characteristics space of consumer goods; this phenomenon is far from negligible and differs across product types. Moreover, our results show that the emergence of new characteristics cannot be modeled as a Poisson process because these new characteristics exhibit clear interdependence over time.

[1]  S. Sanderson,et al.  Managing product families: The case of the Sony Walkman , 1995 .

[2]  R. Nelson Demand, supply, and their interaction on markets, as seen from the perspective of evolutionary economic theory , 2013 .

[3]  R. Nelson Why Schumpeter has had so little influence on today’s main line economics, and why this may be changing , 2012, Journal of Evolutionary Economics.

[4]  P. Romer Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  R. Langlois special issue: Knowledge, consumption, and endogenous growth , 2001 .

[6]  R. Langlois Knowledge, consumption, and endogenous growth , 2000 .

[7]  Félix-Fernando Muñoz,et al.  On novelty and economics: Schumpeter’s paradox , 2006 .

[8]  U. Witt Learning to consume – A theory of wants and the growth of demand , 2001 .

[9]  D. Mowery,et al.  Inside the black box: The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies , 1993 .

[10]  P. Saviotti special issue: Variety, growth and demand , 2001 .

[11]  P. Saviotti Variety, growth and demand , 2001 .

[12]  Nathan,et al.  The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies , 1993 .

[13]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[14]  Thorbjørn Knudsen,et al.  Schumpeter’s Theory of Economic Development: 100 years of development , 2012, Journal of Evolutionary Economics.

[15]  Daniel M. Bartels,et al.  Connecting cognition and consumer choice , 2015, Cognition.

[16]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[17]  K. Arrow The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[18]  Z. Babutsidze Returns to product promotion when consumers are learning how to consume , 2011 .

[19]  N. Bunzeck,et al.  Absolute Coding of Stimulus Novelty in the Human Substantia Nigra/VTA , 2006, Neuron.

[20]  Wilhelm Ruprecht The historical development of the consumption of sweeteners - a learning approach , 2005 .

[21]  John Metcalfe,et al.  Consumption, preferences, and the evolutionary agenda , 2001 .

[22]  Robin Cowan,et al.  A Model of Demand with Interactions Among Consumers , 1997 .

[23]  Ken-ichi Inada Endogenous Technical Progress and Steady Growth , 1969 .

[24]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[25]  K. Lancaster A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  Alfred Kleinknecht,et al.  Collecting Literature-based Innovation Output Indicators. The Experience in the Netherlands , 1993 .

[27]  Olivier Houdé,et al.  Inhibition and cognitive development: object, number, categorization, and reasoning , 2000 .

[28]  Rod Coombs,et al.  A literature-based innovation output indicator , 1996 .

[29]  K. Clark,et al.  Integration and Dynamic Capability: Evidence from Product Development in Automobiles and Mainframe Computers , 1994 .

[30]  U. Witt special issue: Learning to consume - A theory of wants and the growth of demand , 2001 .

[31]  Olivier Houdé,et al.  Measuring inhibitory control in children and adults: brain imaging and mental chronometry , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[32]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[33]  Markus C. Becker,et al.  Schumpeter, Winter, and the sources of novelty , 2006 .

[34]  U. Witt Propositions about novelty , 2009 .

[35]  Jeffrey C. Cooper,et al.  The Lure of the Unknown , 2006, Neuron.

[36]  Kelvin Lancaster,et al.  Change and Innovation in the Technology of Consumption , 1966 .

[37]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[38]  G. D. Stefano,et al.  Technology Push and Demand Pull Perspectives in Innovation Studies: Current Findings and Future Research Directions , 2012 .

[39]  C. Freeman,et al.  The Economics of Industrial Innovation - 3rd Edition , 1997 .

[40]  Wilhelm Ruprecht Preferences and novelty: a multidisciplinary perspective , 2002 .

[41]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[42]  R. Nelson,et al.  An evolutionary theory of household consumption behavior , 2010 .

[43]  U. Witt Symbolic Consumption and the Social Construction of Product Characteristics , 2010 .