Repair of the Immature Craniofacial Skeleton With a Calcium Phosphate Cement: Quantitative Assessment of Craniofacial Growth

The potential for growth restriction has limited the use of alloplastic materials for reconstruction of the growing craniofacial skeleton. A calcium phosphate cement that has been introduced recently for craniofacial reconstruction crystallizes in situ into a substance that resembles more closely the mineral phase of bone, thereby offering the potential for enhanced bioresorption and osteoconductivity. The purpose of these experiments was to assess quantitatively craniofacial growth after reconstruction of frontal craniectomy defects in skeletally immature animals with this calcium phosphate bone mineral substitute. To simulate the calvarial defects that result from unilateral fronto-orbital advancement procedures, unilateral frontal bone flaps were removed in 3-week-old female Yorkshire piglets. The bone flaps were trimmed medially and posteriorly, and were then reattached to the supraorbital ridge. The resulting 5-mm gap between the frontal bone flap and the native bone was either filled with Norian CRS bone cement (N = 3) or left empty (N = 3). After 90 days, the animals were killed and the skulls were harvested and cleared. Direct craniometric measurements were performed on the prepared dry skulls to assess craniofacial growth in all dimensions. Extensive remodeling was observed within defects treated with the calcium phosphate cement, with complete or near-complete replacement of the cement by host bone, resulting in a solid bony union. Direct craniometric measurements revealed no differences in craniofacial growth in any dimension between the operated and unoperated sides of the cranium in either group. These studies demonstrate that craniofacial growth is not restricted after reconstruction of frontal craniectomy defects with carbonated calcium phosphate cement in skeletally immature animals. The remodeling capacity of this material offers promise for its safe use in reconstruction of the growing calvarium.

[1]  A. Gosain,et al.  Biomaterials in the face: benefits and risks. , 1999, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[2]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Biomechanical and Histological Evaluation of a Calcium Phosphate Cement* , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  C. Friedman,et al.  Hydroxyapatite cement in craniofacial skeletal reconstruction and its effects on the developing craniofacial skeleton. , 1998, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[4]  D. Rowe,et al.  Complications associated with harvesting autogenous iliac bone graft. , 1995, American journal of orthopedics.

[5]  S A Goldstein,et al.  Skeletal repair by in situ formation of the mineral phase of bone. , 1995, Science.

[6]  W. Koenig,et al.  Cranial Bone Grafting in Children , 1995, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  J. Fearon,et al.  Comparison of craniofacial growth after rigid fixation with autogenous bone plates and with metal plates. , 1994, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  M. Yaremchuk,et al.  The Effects of Rigid Fixation on Craniofacial Growth of Rhesus Monkeys , 1994, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  J. Richtsmeier,et al.  Craniofacial growth following rigid fixation: suture excision, miniplating, and microplating. , 1993, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[10]  B. Eppley,et al.  Experimental effects of bone plating in infancy on craniomaxillofacial skeletal growth. , 1993, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[11]  J. Bardach,et al.  DEMINERALIZED PERFORATED BONE IMPLANTS IN CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY , 1992, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[12]  J. Richtsmeier,et al.  The Effect of Rigid Fixation on Growth of the Neurocranium , 1991, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  L A Whitaker,et al.  An Experimental Study on the Effect of Rigid Fixation on the Developing Craniofacial Skeleton , 1991, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  J. Marsh,et al.  Craniofacial Onlay Bone Grafting: A Prospective Evaluation of Graft Morphology, Orientation, and Embryonic Origin , 1990, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

[15]  J O Hollinger,et al.  Biodegradable bone repair materials. Synthetic polymers and ceramics. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  J. Mulliken,et al.  Donor-site morbidity after harvesting rib and iliac bone. , 1984, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  L A Whitaker,et al.  Membranous versus Endochondral Bone: Implications for Craniofacial Reconstruction , 1983, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  Wolfe Sa,et al.  Complications associated with the harvesting of cranial bone grafts. , 1995 .