Should the PC be Considered a Technological Revolution ? Evidence from U . S . Metropolitan Areas

The introduction and diffusion of PCs is widely viewed as a technological revolution. Using U.S. metropolitan area-level panel data, this paper asks whether links between PC adoption, educational attainment, and the return to skill conform to a model of technological revolutions where the speed and extent of adoption are endogenous. The model implies that cities will adjust differently to the arrival of a more skill-intensive means of production, with the returns to skill increasing most where skill is abundant and its return is low. We show that the cross-city data fit many of the predictions of the model during the period 1980 to 2000, PC diffusion era.

[1]  Per Krusell,et al.  Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department Staa Report # 236 Capital-skill Complementarity and Inequality: a Macroeconomic Analysis , 2022 .

[2]  John Leahy,et al.  Technological Revolutions , 2020, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

[3]  P. Beaudry,et al.  Changes in U.S. Wages, 1976–2000: Ongoing Skill Bias or Major Technological Change? , 2002, Journal of Labor Economics.

[4]  Susanto Basu,et al.  Appropriate Technology and Growth , 1996 .

[5]  Lawrence F. Katz,et al.  The Polarization of the U.S. Labor Market , 2006 .

[6]  Sandra E. Black,et al.  Why the Apple Doesn't Fall Far: Understanding Intergenerational Transmission of Human Capital , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[7]  R. Nelson,et al.  Investment in humans, technological diffusion and economic growth , 1965 .

[8]  David Card,et al.  Immigrant Inflows, Native Outflows, and the Local Labor Market Impacts of Higher Immigration , 1997, Journal of Labor Economics.

[9]  Peter K. Schott Across-Product Versus Within-Product Specialization in International Trade , 2004 .

[10]  David Card,et al.  The Diffusion of Mexican Immigrants During the 1990s: Explanations and Impacts , 2005 .

[11]  C. Goldin America's Graduation from High School: The Evolution and Spread of Secondary Schooling in the Twentieth Century , 1998, The Journal of Economic History.

[12]  David Card,et al.  Skill‐Biased Technological Change and Rising Wage Inequality: Some Problems and Puzzles , 2002, Journal of Labor Economics.

[13]  J. Powell,et al.  c ○ 2004 The Review of Economic Studies Limited Endogeneity in Semiparametric Binary Response Models , 2001 .

[14]  H. J. Habakkuk,et al.  Second Thoughts on American and British Technology in the Nineteenth Century , 1963 .

[15]  David Autor,et al.  Inequality and Specialization: The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs in the United States , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  Kenneth L. Sokoloff,et al.  The Relative Productivity Hypothesis of Industrialization: The American Case, 1820-1850 , 1981 .

[17]  Paul Beaudry,et al.  Wages and Employment in the United States and Germany: What Explains the Differences? , 2003 .

[18]  John E. Garen,et al.  The Returns to Schooling: A Selectivity Bias Approach with a Continuous Choice Variable , 1984 .

[19]  Enrico Moretti,et al.  Estimating the Social Return to Higher Education: Evidence from Longitudinal and Repeated Cross-Sectional Data , 2002 .

[20]  Christopher R. Berry,et al.  The Divergence of Human Capital Levels Across Cities , 2005 .

[21]  Robert G. Valletta,et al.  Computer Use and the U.S. Wage Distribution, 1984-2003 , 2006 .