Accurate Protein Docking by Shape Complementarity Alone

Elucidating the molecular details of protein-protein interactions is essential to understanding cellular processes. Given the recent increase in protein structural information, mostly of monomeric proteins, we now have the data necessary to address protein-protein interactions by computational approaches. Previous attempts at in silico protein docking generate a multitude of answers that have similarly high scores for both correctly and incorrectly docked proteins. We have developed the first algorithm that successfully predicts the re-docking of known protein-protein complexes without any false positives. Because our algorithm is based on complementarity alone, this implies that shape matching suffices for recognizing correct docking configurations. The essential features needed to achieve accurate protein docking are a fine covering of the space of rigid motions and a score function that counts the number of atoms at close distance. Our results provide a proof-of-principle for the development of faster docking methods based on shape complementarity alone that incorporate protein flexibility.

[1]  G. Marsaglia Choosing a Point from the Surface of a Sphere , 1972 .

[2]  M. L. Connolly Shape complementarity at the hemoglobin alpha 1 beta 1 subunit interface. , 1986, Biopolymers.

[3]  J. Wells,et al.  Systematic mutational analyses of protein-protein interfaces. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[4]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Molecular surface recognition by a computer vision-based technique. , 1994, Protein engineering.

[5]  A. Fersht,et al.  Protein-protein recognition: crystal structural analysis of a barnase-barstar complex at 2.0-A resolution. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[6]  P. Argos,et al.  Cavities and packing at protein interfaces , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[7]  R. Nussinov,et al.  A geometry-based suite of molecular docking processes. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Molecular surface complementarity at protein-protein interfaces: the critical role played by surface normals at well placed, sparse, points in docking. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Hans-Peter Lenhof Parallel Protein Puzzle: A New Suite of Protein Docking Tools , 1997 .

[10]  Gerhard Sagerer,et al.  Estimation and filtering of potential protein-protein docking positions , 1998, Bioinform..

[11]  G. Montelione,et al.  A banner year for membranes , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[12]  G. Weiss,et al.  Rapid mapping of protein functional epitopes by combinatorial alanine scanning. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  A. Elcock,et al.  Computer Simulation of Protein−Protein Interactions , 2001 .

[14]  Todd J. A. Ewing,et al.  DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[15]  Sarah A. Teichmann,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions , 2002, ECCB.

[16]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Soft protein–protein docking in internal coordinates , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[17]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions , 2002, Proteins.

[18]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  CAPRI: A Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions , 2003, Proteins.

[19]  Z. Weng,et al.  ZDOCK: An initial‐stage protein‐docking algorithm , 2003, Proteins.