A finite element model of cell-matrix interactions to study the differential effect of scaffold composition on chondrogenic response to mechanical stimulation.

Mechanically induced cell deformations have been shown to influence chondrocyte response in 3D culture. However, the relationship between the mechanical stimulation and cell response is not yet fully understood. In this study a finite element model was developed to investigate cell-matrix interactions under unconfined compression conditions, using a tissue engineered encapsulating hydrogel seeded with chondrocytes. Model predictions of stress and strain distributions within the cell and on the cell boundary were shown to exhibit space-dependent responses that varied with scaffold mechanical properties, the presence of a pericellular matrix (PCM), and the cell size. The simulations predicted that when the cells were initially encapsulated into the hydrogel scaffolds, the cell size hardly affected the magnitude of the stresses and strains that were reaching the encapsulated cells. However, with the inclusion of a PCM layer, larger cells experienced enhanced stresses and strains resulting from the mechanical stimulation. It was also noted that the PCM had a stress shielding effect on the cells in that the peak stresses experienced within the cells during loading were significantly reduced. On the other hand, the PCM caused the stresses at the cell-matrix interface to increase. Based on the model predictions, the PCM modified the spatial stress distribution within and around the encapsulated cells by redirecting the maximum stresses from the periphery of the cells to the cell nucleus. In a tissue engineered cartilage exposed to mechanical loading, the formation of a neo-PCM by encapsulated chondrocytes appears to protect them from initially excessive mechanical loading. Predictive models can thus shed important insight into how chondrocytes remodel their local environment in order to redistribute mechanical signals in tissue engineered constructs.

[1]  Dany J. Munoz-Pinto,et al.  Influence of hydrogel mechanical properties and mesh size on vocal fold fibroblast extracellular matrix production and phenotype. , 2008, Acta biomaterialia.

[2]  Andrés J. García,et al.  Model of integrin-mediated cell adhesion strengthening. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  The dynamic mechanical environment of the chondrocyte: a biphasic finite element model of cell-matrix interactions under cyclic compressive loading. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  J. Elisseeff,et al.  The influence of biological motifs and dynamic mechanical stimulation in hydrogel scaffold systems on the phenotype of chondrocytes. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[5]  W. Y. Chen,et al.  Characterization of viscoelastic properties of normal and osteoarthritic chondrocytes in experimental rabbit model. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[6]  E B Hunziker,et al.  Mechanical compression modulates matrix biosynthesis in chondrocyte/agarose culture. , 1995, Journal of cell science.

[7]  M. Adams The mechanical environment of chondrocytes in articular cartilage. , 2006, Biorheology.

[8]  Lawrence J Bonassar,et al.  Parametric finite element analysis of physical stimuli resulting from mechanical stimulation of tissue engineered cartilage. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  G. Nuki,et al.  Hyperpolarisation of cultured human chondrocytes following cyclical pressure‐induced strain: Evidence of a role for α5β1 integrin as a chondrocyte mechanoreceptor , 1997 .

[10]  Arthur J Michalek,et al.  A numerical study to determine pericellular matrix modulus and evaluate its effects on the micromechanical environment of chondrocytes. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Gerard A Ateshian,et al.  In-situ measurements of chondrocyte deformation under transient loading. , 2007, European cells & materials.

[12]  J. Elisseeff,et al.  The differential effect of scaffold composition and architecture on chondrocyte response to mechanical stimulation. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[13]  V. Mow,et al.  The mechanical environment of the chondrocyte: a biphasic finite element model of cell-matrix interactions in articular cartilage. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  D L Bader,et al.  Deformation properties of articular chondrocytes: a critique of three separate techniques. , 2002, Biorheology.

[15]  F Guilak,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of chondrocytes from normal and osteoarthritic human cartilage , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[16]  W. Bugbee,et al.  Integrin-mediated adhesion of human articular chondrocytes to cartilage. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[17]  S. Waldman,et al.  Long-term intermittent compressive stimulation improves the composition and mechanical properties of tissue-engineered cartilage. , 2004, Tissue engineering.

[18]  Harold P. Erickson,et al.  Force Measurements of the α5β1 Integrin–Fibronectin Interaction , 2003 .

[19]  G. Vunjak‐Novakovic,et al.  Cultivation of cell‐polymer cartilage implants in bioreactors , 1993, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[20]  H. Bianco-Peled,et al.  Defining the role of matrix compliance and proteolysis in three-dimensional cell spreading and remodeling. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[21]  H Weinans,et al.  Cell and nucleus deformation in compressed chondrocyte-alginate constructs: temporal changes and calculation of cell modulus. , 2002, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[22]  J Mizrahi,et al.  The "instantaneous" deformation of cartilage: effects of collagen fiber orientation and osmotic stress. , 1986, Biorheology.

[23]  J. Weisel,et al.  Binding strength and activation state of single fibrinogen-integrin pairs on living cells , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  W Herzog,et al.  The Mechanical Behaviour of Chondrocytes Predicted with a Micro-structural Model of Articular Cartilage , 2007, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[25]  W Herzog,et al.  Modelling of location- and time-dependent deformation of chondrocytes during cartilage loading. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  R. Loeser Integrins and cell signaling in chondrocytes. , 2002, Biorheology.

[27]  Gerard A. Ateshian,et al.  Influence of Seeding Density and Dynamic Deformational Loading on the Developing Structure/Function Relationships of Chondrocyte-Seeded Agarose Hydrogels , 2002, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  The biomechanical role of the chondrocyte pericellular matrix in articular cartilage. , 2005, Acta biomaterialia.

[29]  Kyriacos A Athanasiou,et al.  In situ mechanical properties of the chondrocyte cytoplasm and nucleus. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  J. Hubbell,et al.  Conjugate addition reactions combined with free-radical cross-linking for the design of materials for tissue engineering. , 2001, Biomacromolecules.

[31]  C. A. Poole Review. Articular cartilage chondrons: form, function and failure , 1997 .

[32]  Walter Herzog,et al.  Analysis of the mechanical behavior of chondrocytes in unconfined compression tests for cyclic loading. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  W. Herzog,et al.  In situ chondrocyte deformation with physiological compression of the feline patellofemoral joint. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  C. V. van Donkelaar,et al.  Rgd-dependent Integrins Are Mechanotransducers in Dynamically Compressed Tissue-engineered Cartilage Constructs , 2022 .

[35]  W M Lai,et al.  A finite deformation theory for cartilage and other soft hydrated connective tissues--I. Equilibrium results. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  T. Laursen,et al.  Determination of the Poisson's ratio of the cell: recovery properties of chondrocytes after release from complete micropipette aspiration. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  T. Andriacchi,et al.  Chondrocyte cells respond mechanically to compressive loads , 1994, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[38]  G A Ateshian,et al.  Functional tissue engineering of articular cartilage through dynamic loading of chondrocyte-seeded agarose gels. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[39]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of human mesenchymally-derived stem cells and primary osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[40]  M. Knight,et al.  Loading alters actin dynamics and up-regulates cofilin gene expression in chondrocytes. , 2007, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[41]  G. Nuki,et al.  Integrin and Mechanosensitive Ion Channel‐Dependent Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Focal Adhesion Proteins and β‐Catenin in Human Articular Chondrocytes After Mechanical Stimulation , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[42]  Jean-Jacques Meister,et al.  Short-term binding of fibroblasts to fibronectin: optical tweezers experiments and probabilistic analysis , 2000, European Biophysics Journal.

[43]  D L Bader,et al.  Compressive strains at physiological frequencies influence the metabolism of chondrocytes seeded in agarose , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[44]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton , 1993 .