Controlled embryoid body formation via surface modification and avidin–biotin cross-linking

Cell–cell interaction is an integral part of embryoid body (EB) formation controlling 3D aggregation. Manipulation of embryonic stem (ES) cell interactions could provide control over EB formation. Studies have shown a direct relationship between EB formation and ES cell differentiation. We have previously described a cell surface modification and cross-linking method for influencing cell–cell interaction and formation of multicellular constructs. Here we show further characterisation of this engineered aggregation. We demonstrate that engineering accelerates ES cell aggregation, forming larger, denser and more stable EBs than control samples, with no significant decrease in constituent ES cell viability. However, extended culture ≥5 days reveals significant core necrosis creating a layered EB structure. Accelerated aggregation through engineering circumvents this problem as EB formation time is reduced. We conclude that the proposed engineering method influences initial ES cell-ES cell interactions and EB formation. This methodology could be employed to further our understanding of intrinsic EB properties and their effect on ES cell differentiation.

[1]  A. Bradley,et al.  Germ-line transmission of genes introduced into cultured pluripotential cells by retroviral vector , 1986, Nature.

[2]  D. Lacks,et al.  Dynamics of spheroid self-assembly in liquid-overlay culture of DU 145 human prostate cancer cells. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[3]  Yihai Cao,et al.  Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Embryoid Bodies Development in Collagen Gels Recapitulates Sprouting Angiogenesis , 2001, Laboratory Investigation.

[4]  J M Polak,et al.  Differentiation of osteoblasts and in vitro bone formation from murine embryonic stem cells. , 2001, Tissue engineering.

[5]  K. Shakesheff,et al.  Surface engineering of living myoblasts via selective periodate oxidation , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  D. Lacks,et al.  Monte Carlo Simulation of LNCaP Human Prostate Cancer Cell Aggregation in Liquid‐Overlay Culture , 2003, Biotechnology progress.

[7]  Aldo R. Boccaccini,et al.  In vitro differentiation and in vivo mineralization of osteogenic cells derived from human embryonic stem cells. , 2004, Tissue engineering.

[8]  Jelena Pjesivac-Grbovic,et al.  A multiscale model for avascular tumor growth. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[9]  C. N. Lee,et al.  Hypoxia-induced apoptosis in endothelial cells and embryonic stem cells , 2005, Apoptosis.

[10]  D. Choi,et al.  In Vitro Differentiation of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells: Enrichment of Endodermal Cells in the Embryoid Body , 2005, Stem cells.

[11]  Peter W Zandstra,et al.  Development of a perfusion fed bioreactor for embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte generation: oxygen-mediated enhancement of cardiomyocyte output. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[12]  T. Braun,et al.  Cardiomyocyte production in mass suspension culture: Embryonic stem cells as a source for great amounts of functional cardiomyocytes , 2005 .

[13]  Richard P Davis,et al.  Forced aggregation of defined numbers of human embryonic stem cells into embryoid bodies fosters robust, reproducible hematopoietic differentiation. , 2005, Blood.

[14]  Peter W Zandstra,et al.  Shear‐Controlled Single‐Step Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Expansion and Embryoid Body–Based Differentiation , 2005, Stem cells.

[15]  Chengpei Xu,et al.  A novel culture system shows that stem cells can be grown in 3D and under physiologic pulsatile conditions for tissue engineering of vascular grafts. , 2006, The Journal of surgical research.

[16]  J. Hassell,et al.  Scale‐Up of Breast Cancer Stem Cell Aggregate Cultures to Suspension Bioreactors , 2006, Biotechnology progress.

[17]  Paul A. De Bank,et al.  Accelerated formation of multicellular 3‐D structures by cell‐to‐cell cross‐linking , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[18]  P. Burridge,et al.  Improved Human Embryonic Stem Cell Embryoid Body Homogeneity and Cardiomyocyte Differentiation from a Novel V‐96 Plate Aggregation System Highlights Interline Variability , 2007, Stem cells.

[19]  A. M. Goodwin In vitro assays of angiogenesis for assessment of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic agents. , 2007, Microvascular research.

[20]  S. Sakaki,et al.  Characterization of embryoid bodies of mouse embryonic stem cells formed under various culture conditions and estimation of differentiation status of such bodies. , 2007, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[21]  T. McDevitt,et al.  Rotary Suspension Culture Enhances the Efficiency, Yield, and Homogeneity of Embryoid Body Differentiation , 2007, Stem cells.

[22]  J. Kang,et al.  Multi-Well Chip for Forming a Uniform Embryoid Body in a Tiny Droplet with Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells , 2007, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[23]  H. Kurosawa Methods for inducing embryoid body formation: in vitro differentiation system of embryonic stem cells. , 2007, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[24]  Y. Berdichevsky,et al.  Cell–cell interaction modulates neuroectodermal specification of embryonic stem cells , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[25]  M. Nasr-Esfahani,et al.  Embryonic Stem Cell Sphere: A Controlled Method for Production of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Aggregates for Differentiation , 2008, The International journal of artificial organs.

[26]  Nathaniel S. Hwang,et al.  Size of the embryoid body influences chondrogenesis of mouse embryonic stem cells , 2008, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[27]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  A microwell array system for stem cell culture. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[28]  Marc Peschanski,et al.  Improvement of culture conditions of human embryoid bodies using a controlled perfused and dialyzed bioreactor system. , 2008, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[29]  K. Woodhouse,et al.  Control of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Colony and Aggregate Size Heterogeneity Influences Differentiation Trajectories , 2008, Stem cells.

[30]  P. Zandstra,et al.  Reproducible, Ultra High-Throughput Formation of Multicellular Organization from Single Cell Suspension-Derived Human Embryonic Stem Cell Aggregates , 2008, PloS one.

[31]  W. James,et al.  Homogeneous monocytes and macrophages from human embryonic stem cells following coculture-free differentiation in M-CSF and IL-3 , 2008, Experimental hematology.

[32]  M. Evans,et al.  Gene expression profiles during early differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells , 2009, BMC Developmental Biology.

[33]  E. Sachlos,et al.  Embryoid body morphology influences diffusive transport of inductive biochemicals: a strategy for stem cell differentiation. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[34]  J. Itskovitz‐Eldor,et al.  Establishing a dynamic process for the formation, propagation, and differentiation of human embryoid bodies. , 2008, Stem cells and development.

[35]  Ross A. Marklein,et al.  Homogeneous and organized differentiation within embryoid bodies induced by microsphere-mediated delivery of small molecules. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[36]  S. Sakaki,et al.  The method of mouse embryoid body establishment affects structure and developmental gene expression. , 2009, Tissue & cell.

[37]  Todd C McDevitt,et al.  Engineering the embryoid body microenvironment to direct embryonic stem cell differentiation , 2009, Biotechnology progress.

[38]  Sharon Gerecht,et al.  Vascular engineering using human embryonic stem cells , 2009, Biotechnology progress.

[39]  K. Shakesheff,et al.  Engineering embryonic stem-cell aggregation allows an enhanced osteogenic differentiation in vitro. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[40]  벤자민 프라이어,et al.  Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells , 2011 .