Accelerometer body sensor network improves systolic time interval assessment with wearable ballistocardiography

Systolic time intervals (STI) are non-invasive measures of cardiac function. Due to the fact that STI can be measured noninvasively outside the clinic, STI are a promising method for long-term monitoring of patients with cardiovascular disease. In particular, the pre-ejection period (PEP) has been measured successfully from body vibrations of the beating heart, a technique called ballistocardiography (BCG), using a weighing scale. Similar measurements can be made with on-body accelerometers, however these wearable BCG signals are typically more challenging to interpret than whole-body BCG. In this paper, we conducted a small pilot study with four subjects to investigate whether a body sensor network of four accelerometers positioned on the wrist, arm, sternum, and head could improve beat-by-beat PEP prediction beyond that of each sensor alone. Linear models were fitted from the R-J and R-I intervals of the four BCG signals to PEP measured with impedance cardiography from 5-minute recordings after isometric lower-body exercise. Specifically, we found that (i) the RMS error of PEP estimation from the wearable BCG sensors can be reduced by using double integration, (ii) the standard deviation of PEP estimates from R-I intervals was smaller than from R-J intervals, and (iii) linear models combining both R-J and R-I measurements from all sensors resulted in the best average correlation (r2 = 0.96 ± 0.01) and lowest average root mean square error (2.5 ± 0.8 ms) from 5×2-fold cross validation.

[1]  Thomas W. Kamarck,et al.  Stability of cardiac impedance measures: Aortic opening (B-point) detection and scoring , 1993, Biological Psychology.

[2]  J. Muehlsteff,et al.  Comparison of systolic time interval measurement modalities for portable devices , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[3]  Gregory T. A. Kovacs,et al.  Rapid Assessment of Cardiac Contractility on a Home Bathroom Scale , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[4]  Paulo Carvalho,et al.  Cardiac status assessment with a multi-signal device for improved home-based congestive heart failure management , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  Shuvo Roy,et al.  Wearable ballistocardiography: Preliminary methods for mapping surface vibration measurements to whole body forces , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[7]  Omer T. Inan,et al.  A Novel System Identification Technique for Improved Wearable Hemodynamics Assessment , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Richard M. Wiard,et al.  Robust ballistocardiogram acquisition for home monitoring , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[9]  Richard P. Lewis,et al.  A Critical Review of the Systolic Time Intervals , 2005 .

[10]  G. Berntson,et al.  Where to B in dZ/dt. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[11]  G DietterichThomas Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms , 1998 .

[12]  Shuvo Roy,et al.  Toward Continuous, Noninvasive Assessment of Ventricular Function and Hemodynamics: Wearable Ballistocardiography , 2015, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[13]  Ramon Pallàs-Areny,et al.  Multi-signal bathroom scale to assess long-term trends in cardiovascular parameters , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.