Maximizing the right stuff: The trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity

Filtering through to what's important Membranes are widely used for gas and liquid separations. Historical analysis of a range of gas pair separations indicated that there was an upper bound on the trade-off between membrane permeability, which limits flow rates, and the selectivity, which limits the quality of the separation process. Park et al. review the advances that have been made in attempts to break past this upper bound. Some inspiration has come from biological membranes. The authors also highlight cases where the challenges lie in areas other than improved separation performance. Science, this issue p. eaab0530 BACKGROUND Synthetic membranes are used for desalination, dialysis, sterile filtration, food processing, dehydration of air and other industrial, medical, and environmental applications due to low energy requirements, compact design, and mechanical simplicity. New applications are emerging from the water-energy nexus, shale gas extraction, and environmental needs such as carbon capture. All membranes exhibit a trade-off between permeability—i.e., how fast molecules pass through a membrane material—and selectivity—i.e., to what extent the desired molecules are separated from the rest. However, biological membranes such as aquaporins and ion channels are both highly permeable and highly selective. Separation based on size difference is common, but there are other ways to either block one component or enhance transport of another through a membrane. Based on increasing molecular understanding of both biological and synthetic membranes, key design criteria for new membranes have emerged: (i) properly sized free-volume elements (or pores), (ii) narrow free-volume element (or pore size) distribution, (iii) a thin active layer, and (iv) highly tuned interactions between permeants of interest and the membrane. Here, we discuss the permeability/selectivity trade-off, highlight similarities and differences between synthetic and biological membranes, describe challenges for existing membranes, and identify fruitful areas of future research. ADVANCES Many organic, inorganic, and hybrid materials have emerged as potential membranes. In addition to polymers, used for most membranes today, materials such as carbon molecular sieves, ceramics, zeolites, various nanomaterials (e.g., graphene, graphene oxide, and metal organic frameworks), and their mixtures with polymers have been explored. Simultaneously, global challenges such as climate change and rapid population growth stimulate the search for efficient water purification and energy-generation technologies, many of which are membrane-based. Additional driving forces include wastewater reuse from shale gas extraction and improvement of chemical and petrochemical separation processes by increasing the use of light hydrocarbons for chemicals manufacturing. OUTLOOK Opportunities for advancing membranes include (i) more mechanically, chemically, and thermally robust materials; (ii) judiciously higher permeability and selectivity for applications where such improvements matter; and (iii) more emphasis on fundamental structure/property/processing relations. There is a pressing need for membranes with improved selectivity, rather than membranes with improved permeability, especially for water purification. Modeling at all length scales is needed to develop a coherent molecular understanding of membrane properties, provide insight for future materials design, and clarify the fundamental basis for trade-off behavior. Basic molecular-level understanding of thermodynamic and diffusion properties of water and ions in charged membranes for desalination and energy applications such as fuel cells is largely incomplete. Fundamental understanding of membrane structure optimization to control transport of minor species (e.g., trace-organic contaminants in desalination membranes, neutral compounds in charged membranes, and heavy hydrocarbons in membranes for natural gas separation) is needed. Laboratory evaluation of membranes is often conducted with highly idealized mixtures, so separation performance in real applications with complex mixtures is poorly understood. Lack of systematic understanding of methodologies to scale promising membranes from the few square centimeters needed for laboratory studies to the thousands of square meters needed for large applications stymies membrane deployment. Nevertheless, opportunities for membranes in both existing and emerging applications, together with an expanding set of membrane materials, hold great promise for membranes to effectively address separations needs. From intrinsic permeability/selectivity trade-off to practical performance in membranes. Polymer membranes for liquid and gas separation applications obey a permeability/selectivity trade-off—highly permeable membranes have low selectivity and vice versa—largely due to broad distributions of free-volume elements (or pores in porous membranes) and nonspecific interactions between small solutes and polymers. We highlight materials approaches to overcome this trade-off, including the development of inorganic, isoporous, mixed matrix, and aquaporin membranes. Further, materials must be processed into thin, typically supported membranes, fashioned into high surface/volume ratio modules, and used in optimized processes. Thus, factors that govern the practical feasibility of membranes such as mechanical strength, module design, and operating conditions are also discussed. Increasing demands for energy-efficient separations in applications ranging from water purification to petroleum refining, chemicals production, and carbon capture have stimulated a vigorous search for novel, high-performance separation membranes. Synthetic membranes suffer a ubiquitous, pernicious trade-off: highly permeable membranes lack selectivity and vice versa. However, materials with both high permeability and high selectivity are beginning to emerge. For example, design features from biological membranes have been applied to break the permeability-selectivity trade-off. We review the basis for the permeability-selectivity trade-off, state-of-the-art approaches to membrane materials design to overcome the trade-off, and factors other than permeability and selectivity that govern membrane performance and, in turn, influence membrane design.

[1]  Jie Shen,et al.  Membranes with fast and selective gas-transport channels of laminar graphene oxide for efficient CO2 capture. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[2]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Water permeability and water/salt selectivity tradeoff in polymers for desalination , 2008 .

[3]  H. Klotz,et al.  Selectivity enhancement via photooxidative surface modification of polyimide air separation membranes , 1994 .

[4]  Yuan Peng,et al.  Metal-organic framework nanosheets as building blocks for molecular sieving membranes , 2014, Science.

[5]  Wolfgang Meier,et al.  Highly permeable polymeric membranes based on the incorporation of the functional water channel protein Aquaporin Z , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Roderick MacKinnon,et al.  Energetic optimization of ion conduction rate by the K+ selectivity filter , 2001, Nature.

[7]  Luda Wang,et al.  Selective molecular sieving through porous graphene. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[8]  I. V. Grigorieva,et al.  Precise and Ultrafast Molecular Sieving Through Graphene Oxide Membranes , 2014, Science.

[9]  Rong Wang,et al.  Influence of monomer concentrations on the performance of polyamide-based thin film composite forwar , 2011 .

[10]  Jay R. Werber,et al.  Forward osmosis: Where are we now? , 2015 .

[11]  Sheng Dai,et al.  Water desalination using nanoporous single-layer graphene. , 2015, Nature nanotechnology.

[12]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[13]  Christopher J. Ellison,et al.  Gas permeation and selectivity of poly(dimethylsiloxane)/graphene oxide composite elastomer membranes , 2016 .

[14]  Young Moo Lee,et al.  Polymers with Cavities Tuned for Fast Selective Transport of Small Molecules and Ions , 2007, Science.

[15]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Water Purification by Membranes: The Role of Polymer Science , 2010 .

[16]  Richard W. Baker,et al.  Pressure ratio and its impact on membrane gas separation processes , 2014 .

[17]  Anita J. Hill,et al.  Nanocrack-regulated self-humidifying membranes , 2016, Nature.

[18]  David J. Hasse,et al.  Sub-ambient temperature flue gas carbon dioxide capture via Matrimid® hollow fiber membranes , 2014 .

[19]  E. Furlani,et al.  Designing ultrathin film composite membranes: the impact of a gutter layer , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[20]  Thomas P. Russell,et al.  Nanoporous Membranes with Ultrahigh Selectivity and Flux for the Filtration of Viruses , 2006 .

[21]  Shane A. Snyder,et al.  Role of membranes and activated carbon in the removal of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals , 2007 .

[22]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Nature gives the best solution for desalination: Aquaporin-based hollow fiber composite membrane with superior performance , 2015 .

[23]  M. Elimelech,et al.  The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment , 2011, Science.

[24]  B. Chait,et al.  The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. , 1998, Science.

[25]  Klaus-Viktor Peinemann,et al.  Selective separation of similarly sized proteins with tunable nanoporous block copolymer membranes. , 2013, ACS nano.

[26]  Christopher J. Ellison,et al.  Synthesis and gas permeability of highly elastic poly(dimethylsiloxane)/graphene oxide composite elastomers using telechelic polymers , 2016 .

[27]  L. Robeson,et al.  The upper bound revisited , 2008 .

[28]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Antifouling membranes for sustainable water purification: strategies and mechanisms. , 2016, Chemical Society reviews.

[29]  C. Grigoropoulos,et al.  Fast Mass Transport Through Sub-2-Nanometer Carbon Nanotubes , 2006, Science.

[30]  Scott M. Husson,et al.  Relating the pore size distribution of ultrafiltration membranes to dextran rejection , 2009 .

[31]  Lee Blaney,et al.  Hybrid anion exchanger for trace phosphate removal from water and wastewater. , 2007, Water research.

[32]  Ronan K. McGovern,et al.  Quantifying the potential of ultra-permeable membranes for water desalination , 2014 .

[33]  Matthias Wessling,et al.  Medical applications of membranes: Drug delivery, artificial organs and tissue engineering , 2008 .

[34]  P. Agre,et al.  Molecular structure of the water channel through aquaporin CHIP. The hourglass model. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[35]  I. Grigorieva,et al.  Unimpeded Permeation of Water Through Helium-Leak–Tight Graphene-Based Membranes , 2011, Science.

[36]  Donald R Paul,et al.  Reformulation of the solution-diffusion theory of reverse osmosis , 2004 .

[37]  Paul Ih-Fei Liu,et al.  Energy, Technology, And The Environment , 2004 .

[38]  J. Post,et al.  Energy recovery from controlled mixing salt and fresh water with a reverse electrodialysis system. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  G. Trägårdh,et al.  Membrane emulsification — a literature review , 2000 .

[40]  L. Robeson,et al.  Upper bound relationship for proton exchange membranes: Empirical relationship and relevance of phase separated blends , 2007 .

[41]  E. Drioli,et al.  Membrane Distillation and Related Operations—A Review , 2005 .

[42]  B. Freeman,et al.  Partitioning of mobile ions between ion exchange polymers and aqueous salt solutions: importance of counter-ion condensation. , 2016, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[43]  S. Khondaker,et al.  Graphene based materials: Past, present and future , 2011 .

[44]  Peter Agre,et al.  Appearance of Water Channels in Xenopus Oocytes Expressing Red Cell CHIP28 Protein , 1992, Science.

[45]  J. M. Henis,et al.  Composite Hollow fiber Mem branes for Gas Separation : The Resistance Model Ap proach , 2017 .

[46]  Lloyd S. White,et al.  Development of large-scale applications in organic solvent nanofiltration and pervaporation for chemical and refining processes , 2006 .

[47]  P. Rossky,et al.  Modeling alkane+perfluoroalkane interactions using all-atom potentials: Failure of the usual combining rules , 2003 .

[48]  A. A. Gusev,et al.  Rapid Mass Transport in Mixed Matrix Nanotube/Polymer Membranes , 2007 .

[49]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  Bioprocess membrane technology , 2007 .

[50]  William J. Koros,et al.  Tailoring mixed matrix composite membranes for gas separations , 1997 .

[51]  Matthias Wessling,et al.  Optimization of membrane based nitrogen removal from natural gas , 2016 .

[52]  B. Freeman,et al.  Analysis of the transport properties of thermally rearranged (TR) polymers and polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIM) relative to upper bound performance , 2017 .

[53]  Freek Kapteijn,et al.  Metal-organic framework nanosheets in polymer composite materials for gas separation , 2014, Nature materials.

[54]  J. Georgiadis,et al.  Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades , 2008, Nature.

[55]  Gyorgy Szekely,et al.  Molecular separation with organic solvent nanofiltration: a critical review. , 2014, Chemical reviews.

[56]  Ryan P. Lively,et al.  Defects in Metal-Organic Frameworks: Challenge or Opportunity? , 2015, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[57]  P. Budd,et al.  Free volume and intrinsic microporosity in polymers , 2005 .

[58]  Yen Wah Tong,et al.  Highly permeable and selective pore-spanning biomimetic membrane embedded with aquaporin Z. , 2012, Small.

[59]  J. Long,et al.  Enhanced ethylene separation and plasticization resistance in polymer membranes incorporating metal-organic framework nanocrystals. , 2016, Nature materials.

[60]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  Permeability and selectivity analysis for ultrafiltration membranes , 2005 .

[61]  J. R. Johnson,et al.  Interfacial microfluidic processing of metal-organic framework hollow fiber membranes , 2014, Science.

[62]  Klaus-Viktor Peinemann,et al.  Self-Assembled Asymmetric Block Copolymer Membranes: Bridging the Gap from Ultra- to Nanofiltration. , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.

[63]  William J. Koros,et al.  Membrane‐based ethylene/ethane separation: The upper bound and beyond , 2013 .

[64]  L. Robeson,et al.  Correlation of separation factor versus permeability for polymeric membranes , 1991 .

[65]  B. Freeman,et al.  Predicting Salt Permeability Coefficients in Highly Swollen, Highly Charged Ion Exchange Membranes. , 2017, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[66]  V. Chen,et al.  Challenges and opportunities for mixed-matrix membranes for gas separation , 2013 .

[67]  C. P. Ribeiro,et al.  Aromatic polyimide and polybenzoxazole membranes for the fractionation of aromatic/aliphatic hydrocarbons by pervaporation , 2012 .

[68]  S. Rowshanzamir,et al.  Review of the proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications , 2010 .

[69]  Akshay Deshmukh,et al.  Pressure-retarded osmosis for power generation from salinity gradients: is it viable? , 2016 .

[70]  B. Freeman,et al.  Highly chlorine-tolerant polymers for desalination. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[71]  R. Baker Membrane Technology and Applications , 1999 .

[72]  X. Duan,et al.  Graphene nanomesh , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[73]  Yue-xiao Shen,et al.  A framework for accurate evaluation of the promise of aquaporin based biomimetic membranes , 2015 .

[74]  Hae-Kwon Jeong,et al.  Heteroepitaxially grown zeolitic imidazolate framework membranes with unprecedented propylene/propane separation performances. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[75]  C. Aring,et al.  A CRITICAL REVIEW , 1939, Journal of neurology and psychiatry.

[76]  Michael O’Keeffe,et al.  The Chemistry and Applications of Metal-Organic Frameworks , 2013, Science.

[77]  L. Robeson Polymer Blends in Membrane Transport Processes , 2010 .

[78]  Jay R. Werber,et al.  Materials for next-generation desalination and water purification membranes , 2016 .

[79]  J. M. Henis,et al.  The Developing Technology of Gas Separating Membranes , 1983, Science.

[80]  L. Giorno,et al.  Membrane Technology: Volume 3: Membranes for Food Applications , 2010 .

[81]  Yun Wang,et al.  A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: Technology, applications,and needs on fundamental research , 2011 .

[82]  William J. Koros,et al.  Mixed matrix hollow fiber membranes made with modified HSSZ-13 zeolite in polyetherimide polymer matrix for gas separation , 2007 .

[83]  Jae-Young Choi,et al.  Selective Gas Transport Through Few-Layered Graphene and Graphene Oxide Membranes , 2013, Science.

[84]  Peter Agre,et al.  Aquaporin water channels (Nobel Lecture). , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.

[85]  Xiao Hu,et al.  Synthesis of robust and high-performance aquaporin-based biomimetic membranes by interfacial polymerization-membrane preparation and RO performance characterization , 2012 .

[86]  Geoffrey M. Geise,et al.  Modeling the water permeability and water/salt selectivity tradeoff in polymer membranes , 2016 .

[87]  Klaus-Viktor Peinemann,et al.  Gas permeation through composite membranes , 1988 .

[88]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of active layer and support layer surface structures on organic fouling propensity of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[89]  H. Kawakami,et al.  Cobalt porphyrin-Mediated Oxygen Transport in a Polymer Membrane: Effect of the Cobalt porphyrin Structure on the Oxygen-Binding Reaction, Oxygen-Diffusion Constants, and Oxygen-Transport Efficiency , 1994 .

[90]  T. Sata,et al.  Ion Exchange Membranes: Preparation, Characterization, Modification and Application , 2004 .

[91]  Jay R. Werber,et al.  The Critical Need for Increased Selectivity, Not Increased Water Permeability, for Desalination Membranes , 2016 .

[92]  R. Ruoff,et al.  The chemistry of graphene oxide. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[93]  V. Abetz,et al.  Asymmetric superstructure formed in a block copolymer via phase separation. , 2007, Nature materials.

[94]  V. Abetz Isoporous block copolymer membranes. , 2015, Macromolecular rapid communications.

[95]  F. Detcheverry,et al.  Optimizing water permeability through the hourglass shape of aquaporins , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[96]  Haiqing Lin,et al.  Power plant post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: An opportunity for membranes , 2010 .

[97]  Richard W. Baker,et al.  Membrane Technology and Applications: Baker/Membrane Technology and Applications , 2012 .

[98]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Fundamental water and salt transport properties of polymeric materials , 2014 .

[99]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Comparison of membrane fouling at constant flux and constant transmembrane pressure conditions , 2014 .

[100]  B. Logan,et al.  Ionic resistance and permselectivity tradeoffs in anion exchange membranes. , 2013, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[101]  F. Kapteijn,et al.  Metal–organic framework based mixed matrix membranes: a solution for highly efficient CO2 capture?† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c4cs00437j Click here for additional data file. , 2015, Chemical Society reviews.

[102]  B. Freeman,et al.  Energy-efficient polymeric gas separation membranes for a sustainable future: A review , 2013 .

[103]  Ngai Yin Yip,et al.  Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[104]  B. Freeman,et al.  Comparison of transport properties of rubbery and glassy polymers and the relevance to the upper bound relationship , 2015 .

[105]  J. G. Wijmans,et al.  The solution-diffusion model: a review , 1995 .

[106]  Miao Yu,et al.  Ultrathin, Molecular-Sieving Graphene Oxide Membranes for Selective Hydrogen Separation , 2013, Science.

[107]  Hae‐Kwon Jeong,et al.  The polymeric upper bound for N2/NF3 separation and beyond; ZIF-8 containing mixed matrix membranes , 2015 .

[108]  T. Merkel,et al.  Carbon dioxide capture with membranes at an IGCC power plant , 2012 .

[109]  Doros N. Theodorou,et al.  Geometric analysis of diffusion pathways in glassy and melt atactic polypropylene , 1993 .

[110]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water , 2012, Nature.

[111]  Ryan P. Lively,et al.  Zeolitic imidazolate frameworks: next-generation materials for energy-efficient gas separations. , 2014, ChemSusChem.

[112]  W. Koros,et al.  Non-ideal effects in organic-inorganic materials for gas separation membranes , 2005 .

[113]  William J. Koros,et al.  Defining the challenges for C3H6/C3H8 separation using polymeric membranes , 2003 .

[114]  Ryan S. Kingsbury,et al.  Energy storage by reversible electrodialysis: The concentration battery , 2015 .

[115]  Pankaj Arora,et al.  Battery separators. , 2004, Chemical reviews.

[116]  D. Holdstock Past, present--and future? , 2005, Medicine, conflict, and survival.

[117]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Basis of Permeability/Selectivity Tradeoff Relations in Polymeric Gas Separation Membranes , 1999 .

[118]  J. Gagné Literature Review , 2018, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.