Diminishing return on investment for biodiversity data in conservation planning

It is generally assumed that gathering more data is a good investment for conservation planning. However, the benefits of additional data have seldom been evaluated by analyzing the return on investment. If there are diminishing returns in terms of improved planning, then resources might be better directed toward other actions, depending on their relative costs and benefits. Our aim was to determine the return on investment from spending different amounts on survey data before undertaking a program of implementing new protected areas. We estimated how much protea data is obtained as a function of dollars invested in surveying. We then simulated incremental protection and loss of habitat to determine the benefit of investment in that data on the protection of proteas. We found that, after an investment of only US$100,000 (∼780,000 South Africa Rand [ZAR]), there was little increase in the effectiveness of conservation prioritizations, despite the full data set costing at least 25 times that amount.

[1]  Ana S. L. Rodrigues,et al.  Shortcuts for Biodiversity Conservation Planning: The Effectiveness of Surrogates , 2007 .

[2]  R. Cowling,et al.  Vegetation-environment relationships on a species-rich coastal mountain range in the fynbos biome (South Africa) , 1996, Vegetatio.

[3]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Why biodiversity surveys are good value , 1999, Nature.

[4]  Michael Drielsma,et al.  Landscape scenario modelling of vegetation condition , 2006 .

[5]  Ana S. L. Rodrigues,et al.  Species, Data, and Conservation Planning , 2004 .

[6]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Conservation planning in a changing world. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  A. V. van Jaarsveld,et al.  Sensitivity of selection procedures for priority conservation areas to survey extent, survey intensity and taxonomic knowledge , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Effectiveness of land classes as surrogates for species in conservation planning for the Cape Floristic Region , 2003 .

[9]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  An Operational Model for Implementing Conservation Action , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[10]  R. Pearson,et al.  Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: A test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar , 2006 .

[11]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Reserve Selection in Regions with Poor Biological Data , 2003 .

[12]  Jennifer R. Davis,et al.  Reduced survey intensity and its consequences for marine reserve selection , 2003, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[13]  S. Ferrier.  Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: where to from here? , 2002, Systematic biology.

[14]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  The Value of Biodiversity in Reserve Selection: Representation, Species Weighting, and Benefit Functions , 2005 .

[15]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Knowing But Not Doing: Selecting Priority Conservation Areas and the Research–Implementation Gap , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[16]  R. Scholes,et al.  Land-cover changes in South Africa 1911-1993 , 2002 .

[17]  S. Andelman,et al.  Conserving Biodiversity Efficiently: What to Do, Where, and When , 2007, PLoS biology.

[18]  G. Powell,et al.  Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth , 2001 .

[19]  S. Polasky,et al.  Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  Robert L Pressey,et al.  Measuring and Incorporating Vulnerability into Conservation Planning , 2005, Environmental management.

[21]  D. Cleary.  The Questionable Effectiveness of Science Spending by International Conservation Organizations in the Tropics , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[22]  Joanna Grand,et al.  Biased data reduce efficiency and effectiveness of conservation reserve networks. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[23]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Money for Nothing? A Call for Empirical Evaluation of Biodiversity Conservation Investments , 2006, PLoS biology.

[24]  R. Cowling,et al.  Embracing Opportunism in the Selection of Priority Conservation Areas , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[25]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Accounting for habitat loss rates in sequential reserve selection : Simple methods for large problems , 2007 .

[26]  M. C. Rutherford,et al.  The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. , 2006 .

[27]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Ad Hoc Reservations: Forward or Backward Steps in Developing Representative Reserve Systems? , 1994 .

[28]  Richard M. Cowling,et al.  The identification of Broad Habitat Units as biodiversity entities for systematic conservation planning in the Cape Floristic Region , 2001 .

[29]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  How can you conserve species that haven't been found? , 2007 .

[30]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Introduction to systematic conservation planning in the Cape Floristic Region , 2003 .

[31]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[32]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions , 2006 .

[33]  Jonathan B. Oetting,et al.  Systematic reserve design as a dynamic process: F-TRAC and the Florida Forever program , 2006 .

[34]  Mathieu Rouget,et al.  Developing products for conservation decision‐making: lessons from a spatial biodiversity assessment for South Africa , 2007 .

[35]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data , 2006 .

[36]  J. W. Bruce,et al.  The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths , 2001 .

[37]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Designing Systematic Conservation Assessments that Promote Effective Implementation: Best Practice from South Africa , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[38]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Is maximizing protection the same as minimizing loss? Efficiency and retention as alternative measures of the effectiveness of proposed reserves , 2004 .

[39]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world , 2004 .

[40]  S. Andelman,et al.  Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.