Influence of turbulence kinetic energy on bubble size in different scale flotation cells

Abstract Although the impact of hydrodynamic conditions in a flotation cell is often evaluated by correlating impeller tip speed with bubble size, the literature reports inconsistent results, some showing a reduction in bubble Sauter mean diameter ( d 32 ) with increasing impeller speed, others showing little to no effect. A review of these results indicate that cell size may be a factor where small laboratory-scale cells, smaller than 50 L, tend to support the correlation while larger machines do not. This paper demonstrates an alternative approach using the average turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) in place of the impeller speed. Results were obtained using two cells with the same geometry but different size, 5 L and 60 L. Bubble size ( d 32 ) was measured using the Anglo Platinum Bubble Sizer. Local velocity and velocity fluctuation were measured using a constant temperature anemometer to estimate the average turbulent kinetic energy (TKE). The effect of impeller tip speed on d 32 and TKE as a function of air rate was determined. Combining the results for the two cells showed that d 32 initially decreased with increasing TKE to become constant above a critical TKE. The TKE region below critical was associated largely with the 5 L cell and the region above critical more associated with the 60 L cell. The inconsistent data in the literature has been explained by introducing the concept of the critical TKE and it has been confirmed that the reported effect of increasing impeller speed may have its origin in the size of the cells tested: laboratory scale cells showing an effect on reducing bubble size as TKE is below critical while large and industrial scale cells may not as TKE is above critical.

[1]  S. Grano,et al.  Hydrodynamics and scale up in Rushton turbine flotation cells: Part 1 — Cell hydrodynamics , 2007 .

[2]  S. Grano,et al.  Hydrodynamics and scale up in Rushton turbine flotation cells: Part 2. Flotation scale-up for laboratory and pilot cells , 2006 .

[3]  Stefan Luther,et al.  Data analysis for hot-film anemometry in turbulent bubbly flow , 2004 .

[4]  D. Fornasiero,et al.  Calculation of the flotation rate constant of chalcopyrite particles in an ore , 2003 .

[5]  Dai,et al.  Particle-Bubble Attachment in Mineral Flotation. , 1999, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[6]  James A. Finch,et al.  Gas dispersion measurements in flotation cells , 2007 .

[7]  Emmanuel Manlapig,et al.  Studies on impeller type, impeller speed and air flow rate in an industrial scale flotation cell — Part 1: Effect on bubble size distribution , 1995 .

[8]  D. Reay,et al.  Removal of fine particles from water by dispersed air flotation: effects of bubble size and particle size on collection efficiency , 1973 .

[9]  J. Finch,et al.  Some gas dispersion characteristics of mechanical flotation machines , 2006 .

[10]  W. J. Howarth,et al.  The collision efficiency of small particles with spherical air bubbles , 1971 .

[11]  Peter N. Holtham,et al.  Water velocity measurements inside a hydrocyclone using an Aeroprobe & Comparison with CFD predictions , 2007 .

[12]  B. Rezai,et al.  Bubble–particle collision and attachment probability on fine particles flotation , 2010 .

[13]  R. Yoon,et al.  Application of Extended DLVO Theory, IV: Derivation of Flotation Rate Equation from First Principles , 1996 .

[14]  Kari Heiskanen,et al.  Bubble size distribution in laboratory scale flotation cells , 2005 .

[15]  Janusz S. Laskowski,et al.  Bubble coalescence and its effect on dynamic foam stability , 2002 .

[16]  G. K. Patterson,et al.  Laser-Doppler measurements of turbulent-flow parameters in a stirred mixer , 1989 .

[17]  J. Abrahamson Collision rates of small particles in a vigorously turbulent fluid , 1975 .

[18]  Graeme J. Jameson,et al.  The effect of bubble size on the rate of flotation of fine particles , 1985 .

[19]  James A. Finch,et al.  Comparing the effect of salts and frother (MIBC) on gas dispersion and froth properties , 2007 .

[20]  James A. Finch,et al.  Bubble size as a function of impeller speed in a self-aeration laboratory flotation cell , 2006 .

[21]  D. A. Deglon,et al.  An evaluation of a direct method of bubble size distribution measurement in a laboratory batch flotation cell , 1994 .

[22]  James A. Finch,et al.  Role of frother on bubble production and behaviour in flotation , 2008 .

[23]  J. Laskowski,et al.  Effect of Frothers on Bubble Size and Foam Stability in Potash Ore Flotation Systems , 2008 .

[24]  F. E. Jørgensen,et al.  The computer-controlled constant-temperature anemometer. Aspects of set-up, probe calibration, data acquisition and data conversion , 1996 .

[25]  J. Laskowski,et al.  Effect of frothers on bubble size , 2005 .